2/8/2003: Yet more nude protesters

Undertoad • Feb 8, 2003 2:01 pm
Image

Image

Too much naked protest on IotD? Ah well, these are pretty good and I'm light on images right now.

Sydney outclasses NYC by far when it comes to naked protest. For the first shot, above, only a pathetic 30 women turned out in Central Park. Maybe it was the weather? But in Sydney, they had a remarkable 750 and were able to form double-wide letters as well as to put a heart around the whole thing.

Of course, if they did such a thing in Baghdad, they'd all be shot.
blowmeetheclown • Feb 8, 2003 2:11 pm
I wonder if all the women in the first photo are Brazilian...
Count Zero • Feb 8, 2003 3:40 pm

Of course, if they did such a thing in Baghdad, they'd all be shot...


..by the US.
Elspode • Feb 8, 2003 4:24 pm
The one in the snow seems to me to be more of a statement about hirsute groins than any sort of a war protest...
slang • Feb 8, 2003 5:39 pm
If these goofs were really serious, they would single out some of the more shapely female volunteers, have them tatood in or near their "private parts" with some dumb anti-war bullshit, and take close up shots, nude of course. The fact that they are naked is negated by the fact that they are too far away for me to see them and are generally someone I wouldn't want to see naked anyway.

Then they might have my attention, especially if they were asian women.
blowmeetheclown • Feb 8, 2003 5:49 pm
Originally posted by slang
...have them tatood in or near their "private parts" with some dumb anti-war bullshit, and take close up shots, nude of course...
Reminded me of this:

Image
dave • Feb 8, 2003 6:01 pm
Originally posted by Count Zero
..by the US.


I think he meant by the Iraqi regime, which has a history of "neutralizing" opposition.