John Sellers • Aug 9, 2012 6:17 pm
Hmm, now WHO should I start with. How about a mix of the opening sequences for the first 10 incarnations of the Doctor.
[YOUTUBE]DnKNupdSH8g[/YOUTUBE]
[YOUTUBE]DnKNupdSH8g[/YOUTUBE]
Rhianne;824103 wrote:I know, I'm a hopeless pedant, but I'm not sure that anything fitting my understanding of the word 'gargoyle' appears in that clip.
Agreed. But an extra minute's an extra minute of Who!John R. Sellers;824100 wrote:ok HM, your Post of the DW intros is pretty good, but IMO, Craig's is better becuz he found a way to transition from one intro to the other. The one you posted is just a collection of intros.
Rhianne;824122 wrote:A gargoyle is a water spout. If it doesn't have a little gravity chute for water then it's a grotesque, not a gargoyle.
John R. Sellers;824154 wrote:You missed the whole point. The show was loosely based on the symbolism, not the statue itself. The idea is that these mythological creatures warded off evil.
Rhianne;824122 wrote:A gargoyle is a water spout. If it doesn't have a little gravity chute for water then it's a grotesque, not a gargoyle.
John R. Sellers;824130 wrote:And what do you think it is? I believe I know what you think it is, but I wanna know what you think it is.
John R. Sellers;824154 wrote:You missed the whole point. The show was loosely based on the symbolism, not the statue itself. The idea is that these mythological creatures warded off evil.
Rhianne;824224 wrote:pedantry
Sundae;824234 wrote:Thank you, thank you, thank you, Rhi.
This made me laugh so hard.
Undertoad;824225 wrote:I'll favor the first two Trek openings, but the opening for "Enterprise" was so bad it helped kill the franchise on TV.
John R. Sellers;824243 wrote:You gotta be doin' nitrous, cuz I ain't gettin' the humor.
Sundae;824455 wrote:maybe because it was humour
John R. Sellers;824243 wrote:You gotta be doin' nitrous, cuz I ain't gettin' the humor.