Why is my thread not posted???

Abby's Hope... • Jul 27, 2011 9:23 pm
Where is my thread? Did I do something to offend someone?? Just in a bad spot right now. And now it appears I am not welcome here... I have no one. So please, post my thread; as I am in need of advice...:sniff:
glatt • Jul 28, 2011 8:23 am
New members need to have their threads approved. Yours have been approved now. Welcome to the Cellar. I hope you find the help here that you are looking for.
footfootfoot • Jul 28, 2011 8:49 am
glatt;747029 wrote:
New members need to have their threads approved. Yours have been approved now. Welcome to the Cellar. I hope you find the help here that you are looking for Pamela.
ZenGum • Jul 28, 2011 8:52 am
I too have a sense of deja vu.

Meanwhile ...

Hi Abby! :welcome:
infinite monkey • Jul 28, 2011 8:57 am
Me 3. But EImma giving the benefit of the doubt.
casimendocina • Jul 28, 2011 8:58 am
Everyone who has posted in this thread is online as I type except for the original OP.
glatt • Jul 28, 2011 9:14 am
I forgot about her. Thanks for the warning everyone. A little google search shows it's her.

*breaks out hammer*
infinite monkey • Jul 28, 2011 9:16 am
She's a wily one. ;)
ZenGum • Jul 28, 2011 9:19 am
Glatt, how the #$%& did you forget PP???
glatt • Jul 28, 2011 9:22 am
I know! I blocked it from my memory, I guess. But it all came rushing back like a nightmare.
Trilby • Jul 28, 2011 10:09 am
Oh, let's be nice to her.
sexobon • Jul 28, 2011 11:07 am
glatt;747041 wrote:
I forgot about her. ... *breaks out hammer*

If I had a hammer,
I'd hammer in the cellar
I'd hammer in home base
All over this thread
I'd hammer out pensive
I'd hammer out a starring
I'd hammer out mods between
The dwellars and the trollers ah-aaah
All over this thread


Next time you'll have to break out the bell.
DanaC • Jul 28, 2011 2:46 pm
Or better still, you could break out the biscuits...
glatt • Jul 28, 2011 2:54 pm
only if there is tea to go with them.
DanaC • Jul 28, 2011 2:59 pm
There must be tea.
Beest • Jul 28, 2011 4:44 pm
DanaC;747094 wrote:
There must be tea.


Image
A drinks too wet without one
DanaC • Jul 28, 2011 5:10 pm
Oh nice!

80s wrapping too right?
Rhianne • Jul 28, 2011 5:18 pm
Wasn't it Rich Teas, not Digestives, that a drink was too wet without?
Rhianne • Jul 28, 2011 5:19 pm
Please help me cure my pedantry!
Rhianne • Jul 28, 2011 5:23 pm
Rich Tea - to see if I can post a pic without what I now know is hotlinking!
DanaC • Jul 28, 2011 7:31 pm
Y'know, I think it might have been at that.
TheMercenary • Jul 28, 2011 7:55 pm
Abby is gone. Where is Abby (Alice)?
Pete Zicato • Jul 29, 2011 10:20 am
Igor: Abby someone.
Dr. Frederick Frankenstein: [pause, then] Abby someone. Abby who?
Igor: Abby... Normal.
Dr. Frederick Frankenstein: [pause, then] Abby Normal?
Igor: I'm almost sure that was the name.
infinite monkey • Jul 29, 2011 10:48 am
TheMercenary;747136 wrote:
Abby is gone. Where is Abby (Alice)?


Alice doesn't live here anymore.

To all:

Hey...when did SE's name (the name we use for reference) completely change to PP as name for reference? Now, if she comes back, as say "Lovey Faith" will we refer to the time that AH (name used for reference) was here? :confused:

I think we're totally fucking up the provenance.

Let's not forget our beginnings, my friends, or we're bound to repeat...I don't know. Something.
footfootfoot • Jul 29, 2011 12:09 pm
Startling Enema and Pensive Spam were two different entities. One was a lib baiter and the other was what did I do to deserve this treatment. Both nutty as fruitcakes, but different M.O.s
sexobon • Jul 29, 2011 12:36 pm
Maybe Pensive Spam is the Bizarro Startling Enema. Until I see a picture of the former, I'm not ruling it out.
infinite monkey • Jul 29, 2011 2:19 pm
I guess I missed something. I thought Pam was Emma redid.
footfootfoot • Jul 29, 2011 8:13 pm
you've got another think coming.
ZenGum • Jul 29, 2011 8:38 pm
I'm with foot. There are plenty of crazies out there, these seemed too different to be the same.
casimendocina • Jul 30, 2011 4:03 am
Chocolate digestives MUST be chocolate covered to be edible in which case an entire packet can be downed in one sitting.
footfootfoot • Jul 30, 2011 11:38 am
casimendocina;747351 wrote:
Chocolate digestives MUST be chocolate covered to be edible in which case an entire packet should be downed in one sitting.


FTFY