How many problems could we solve

monster • Mar 9, 2011 11:58 pm
if we bumped off Carlos Slim, and used his wealth for the greater good?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-12691377
Cloud • Mar 10, 2011 12:06 am
end justifies means?
zippyt • Mar 10, 2011 12:37 am
$74BIG !!
And I Meen BIG !!!
monster • Mar 10, 2011 9:21 am
That's a serious amount of moolah! No-one could possibly use all that, not even Charlie Sheen.
Sheldonrs • Mar 10, 2011 9:51 am
It must be nice to know that you could take everyone on the planet out for a cup of coffee at Starbucks and STILL be super rich.
monster • Mar 10, 2011 9:57 am
That would be a cool thing to do! Or to any coffee shop other than starbucks and see if you can bring them down......
GunMaster357 • Mar 10, 2011 10:29 am
I don't think you would solve a lot of problems by doing that. In fact, I'm of the opinion you'd create other problems.

To distribute this bounty more or less in a fair manner, may people would cry loudly that a agency be created to do it...




And there goes away the bounty, sucked up in that vacuum of a black hole named bureaucracy.
footfootfoot • Mar 10, 2011 4:22 pm
AMEN.
while we're busy fucking cancer let's add bureaucracy to the list.
SamIam • Mar 10, 2011 6:32 pm
monster;715859 wrote:
if we bumped off Carlos Slim, and used his wealth for the greater good?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-12691377


Just don't let Flint know what you're doing! :eek:
casimendocina • Mar 11, 2011 4:58 am
monster;715859 wrote:
if we bumped off Carlos Slim, and used his wealth for the greater good?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-12691377


In relation to this was just thinking (if it's relevant analogy and it seems to be) that bumping off Pablo Escobar in Colombia didn't solve the problems he created at all.
wolf • Mar 11, 2011 12:16 pm
Money, either in it's lack or sudden acquisition causes more problems than it solves.
Shawnee123 • Mar 11, 2011 12:36 pm
wolf;716143 wrote:
Money, either in it's lack or sudden acquisition causes more problems than it solves.


True. This is why I would be perfectly content with some money trickling my way. A trickling but constant flow of "other money" besides my paycheck.

Barring that, I'd be perfectly happy winning 100 grand on Rolling Cash 5.

I don't want millions, that would just make me crazy. I would just like a fresh start with some extra, for a few nice things for me. :)
Spexxvet • Mar 11, 2011 12:44 pm
When I win Powerball, put me on your death pool. I will eat, drink, and drug myself to death within a year. The sky is the limit!
Shawnee123 • Mar 11, 2011 12:46 pm
I'd rather you just gave me a few grand and DIDN't eat drink or drug yourself to death. We could start a business. WE could travel. We could, occasionally, eat drink and drug, but not to death. WE CAN DO IT!
casimendocina • Mar 17, 2011 7:07 am
casimendocina;716083 wrote:
In relation to this was just thinking (if it's relevant analogy and it seems to be) that bumping off Pablo Escobar in Colombia didn't solve the problems he created at all.


From the little I know about Colombia, Pablo Escobar also used a lot of his money to build neighbourhoods for the underprivileged and as a result is still remembered with fondness in those places, but if the damage caused by those with the money to be able to afford this kind of philanthropy outweighs the good, then blocks should be put on it (a bit like corporate contributions to political parties).
Big Sarge • Mar 18, 2011 1:36 am
Bump him off and re-distribute wealth. Hmm, seems like someone tried this sort of thing in 1917. I wonder how that turned out.....
casimendocina • Mar 18, 2011 6:05 am
Did the Tsar have any dodgy stuff going on on the side?