Really? This Offended You?

Gravdigr • Mar 1, 2011 3:58 am
[COLOR="Red"][SIZE="4"]***THIS POST CONTAINS LINKS TO CELLAR POSTS THAT ARE NSFW***[/SIZE][/COLOR]

First: Again, let me say right off, there was no intention to offend anyone. But someone was offended. By this. But, not, apparently, by this. Really? Offended by this, but, I guess, not offended by this. Really? Offended by stuff like this. But, not stuff like this. Really?

Perhaps you aren't aware that NFSW means Not Safe For Work. That means some people may find the content offensive or unsuitable for viewing in the workplace.

Yet again, I'm sorry you were offended by my postings.
monster • Mar 1, 2011 8:01 am
Without even looking at what's pissed you off this time, I have this to say:

1) Most dwellars are people. Different people find different things offensive in differents contexts on different days in different moods. Thank FSM for that.

2) NSFW tags are not a licence to share anything. Child snuff pron, for example, will never be OK

3) Who the fuck are you to tell anyone what they should and should not find offensive?

KTHXBAI
Alluvial • Mar 1, 2011 8:37 am
It was the trashy apartment, that's just beyond the pale. How dare you show that.




:p:
Sheldonrs • Mar 1, 2011 8:48 am
It's nice to know I had a hand (or at least a finger) in NOT offending people. :D
Trilby • Mar 1, 2011 9:30 am
oh get over it.
jimhelm • Mar 1, 2011 9:41 am
funny how often tough guys are so delicate
Alluvial • Mar 1, 2011 11:50 am
Actually, I *am* offended.

I'm offended that my arse doesn't look like that. :cry:
Sheldonrs • Mar 1, 2011 12:09 pm
Alluvial;713924 wrote:
Actually, I *am* offended.

I'm offended that my arse doesn't look like that. :cry:


Just put it behind you. ;)
Perry Winkle • Mar 1, 2011 12:52 pm
I can't even tell where anyone voiced any offense. Maybe in a PM?
Sundae • Mar 1, 2011 12:56 pm
Maybe it was Tiki.
Nirvana • Mar 1, 2011 1:15 pm
I think GD is an ass, man ! Oh dear did I put that comma in the wrong place? So sorry if I offended anyone.
monster • Mar 1, 2011 1:22 pm
Sundae Girl;713945 wrote:
Maybe it was Tiki.


Yes, digger does seem a little tikied off.
footfootfoot • Mar 1, 2011 1:55 pm
Some cheese with that whine?

Image
Sheldonrs • Mar 1, 2011 2:05 pm
Nirvana;713962 wrote:
I think GD is an ass, man ! Oh dear did I put that comma in the wrong place? So sorry if I offended anyone.


I thought I was the ass man?
Shawnee123 • Mar 1, 2011 2:06 pm
[COLOR="White"]...[/COLOR]
Sheldonrs • Mar 1, 2011 2:28 pm
Shawnee123;713987 wrote:
[COLOR="White"]...[/COLOR]


Licensed to bugger. ;-)
monster • Mar 1, 2011 2:52 pm
How does one acquire a license to bugger? Is there a practical exam? Is one required to penetrate the examiner? Or is it just a multiple choice quiz? Are there probationary terms involved?
Shawnee123 • Mar 1, 2011 2:54 pm
Will there be a proctor?
monster • Mar 1, 2011 2:55 pm
ding ding ding. You are the mistress.
footfootfoot • Mar 1, 2011 3:01 pm
An invigilator
Stormieweather • Mar 1, 2011 8:38 pm
Honestly G-Digr, you simply cannot please all of the people all of the time. So who cares?

If it matters, I've never been offended by anything you posted.
Pete Zicato • Mar 1, 2011 9:27 pm
While I'd rather look at some of those pictures than others, all those links were to NSFW threads. (Had to wait until I was home to check) So don't let it bother you.
Nirvana • Mar 1, 2011 9:50 pm
Sheldonrs;713986 wrote:
I thought I was the ass man?


Depends on where you put your comma ;)
Crimson Ghost • Mar 1, 2011 9:50 pm
Shawnee123;714013 wrote:
Will there be a proctor?


I wouldn't gamble on it.
Gravdigr • Mar 1, 2011 11:46 pm
Cuzz it was pointed out to me in a private message. And when I apologized (I've lost count how many times I've apologized) to the offended and pretty much said the exact same thing you people are saying to me, I got a "Well I should have known you would respond the way you did." I suppose they meant practically and sanely.

And just so ya know, I wasn't bitching. I was trying to show, in what I thought was a pretty blatant manner, that what is offensive and not offensive can be different and inconsistent, even in the same person. The offended Dwellar was offended by "scantily clad women". That means clad. Clothed. Naughty bits covered. Nothing was said about full frontal nudity. Cocksucking, not mentioned. Photos of folks plainly engaged in coitus.:eek: Nothing, not a peep. Men fingering other men in the ass?!:3_eyes: Silence.

Gimme a fucking break.

And if you're offended by such things, WHY IN THE FUCK WOULD YOU READ A THREAD TITLED WTF NSFW????
Gravdigr • Mar 1, 2011 11:53 pm
monster;713867 wrote:
[COLOR="Red"]Without even looking at what's pissed you off this time,[/COLOR]:

1) Most dwellars are people. Different people find different things offensive in differents contexts on different days in different moods. Thank FSM for that.

2) NSFW tags are not a licence to share anything. Child snuff pron, for example, will never be OK

3) Who the fuck are you to tell anyone what they should and should not find offensive?

KTHXBAI



On #1: Agreed.

On #2: [COLOR="Red"]Ya maybe ought to look.[/COLOR] The pics that were complained about, yeah they're among the tamest thing I've posted.

On #3: I've told nobody how to think. (Don't get all snooty just cuzz yer bendy!)
Gravdigr • Mar 1, 2011 11:57 pm
jimhelm;713887 wrote:
funny how often tough guys are so delicate


He thinks I'm tough and delicate. :blush:

Looks like somebody has a mancrush.:joylove:

Jim, I like you, but, seriously, stay away from my ass.:unsure:
monster • Mar 2, 2011 12:17 am
you miss the point (again) I don't care how tame what you posted is (in your opinion), stop whining and stop using the NSFW tags as an excuse ..once, twice can be forgiven, but you keep on whining about this shit. It's not the content that pisses me off, it's the goddamn whining. Life ain't fair, honey.

And yes, when you say "If you are not offended by that you shouldn't be offended by this" you are "telling them how to think"
Gravdigr • Mar 2, 2011 2:22 am
As usual I'm wrong no matter what the fuck the problem is EVER, I'm wrong. Looks like I'm just wrong all the fucking time. I was just born to be wrong I guess.
Big Sarge • Mar 2, 2011 2:30 am
I'd just give up on trying to figure out the whys and what fors. Face it, you'll always be wrong because you are a male and you are from the South. You'll never win with all of these yankee women.
Aliantha • Mar 2, 2011 3:22 am
Some people just can't be reasoned with. :rolleyes:

Why someone would bother sending a PM to say they're offended boggles the mind, but I guess that's what the person thought was the right thing to do.

Some people are right though, some things are more offensive to some people than others. There are some things said or pictures posted on this site that I find offensive, but that's life. Everyone's different. Sometimes there's a deeper reason for things being viewed as offensive, but usually if that's the case, the person wont actually say it.

I went through this issue years ago when I came here after someone cracked a joke which to me was offensive.

You need to remember that in this place, if people think you should just suck it up then you'll get no sympathy, even if it's about something that's particularly difficult for you.

eta: oh yeah, flame away. :)
DanaC • Mar 2, 2011 7:24 am
I checked the links. I honestly don't see why someone would be offended by the pics you posted Gravedigr.

I can see why he's aggravated. I can also see the point of the thread. I don;t see that he is telling anybody how to think. He's just venting his frustration and confusion as to why his seemingly inoffensive pics were pounced on as a cause for offense when they are probably three of the mildest pics ever to carry an NSFW tag.

I'm not saying nobody should be offended by them. As has already been stated, people are offended by different things. Whomever it was that sent the private message may have very specific reasons to find those images offensive.

For the record though Gravedigr: without an explanation from the offended party, I honestly cannot see why they were offended by your pics.
monster • Mar 2, 2011 7:53 am
An insincere apology is worthless. If you say "I'm sorry" and then complain about the complaint on the board ......worthless, meaningless, hypocritical..... you're not remotely sorry at all. Which is fine. Maybe the complaint was ridiculous. But don't be surprised your apology isn't accepted. Not rocket science.
Bullitt • Mar 2, 2011 8:24 am
Big Sarge;714130 wrote:
I'd just give up on trying to figure out the whys and what fors. Face it, you'll always be wrong because you are a male and you are from the South. You'll never win with all of these yankee women.


Quoted for truth
Shawnee123 • Mar 2, 2011 8:31 am
Awww, the poor downtrodden southern male. We need some tough legislation. :lol2:
Bullitt • Mar 2, 2011 8:40 am
He just needs a hug that's all
Shawnee123 • Mar 2, 2011 8:42 am
:grouphug:

HUGS!
classicman • Mar 2, 2011 8:56 am
sigh - I think the first pic Grav posted that was "NSFW", created a stir and was moved or relabeled "NSFW" by Bruce.

ETA - It may have been the image of [COLOR="White"]the children hanging off the crib[/COLOR]. It was certainly around that time.
Undertoad • Mar 2, 2011 10:09 am
That was somebody else putting it in IotD.
Nirvana • Mar 2, 2011 10:27 am
OMG what must people think of my skin pics? :eek: :right: Read my user line and feel free to use it yourself GD

Do I Look Like I Give A Rat's Ass?
footfootfoot • Mar 2, 2011 10:44 am
Gravdigr;714127 wrote:
As usual I'm wrong no matter what the fuck the problem is EVER, I'm wrong. Looks like I'm just wrong all the fucking time. I was just born to be wrong I guess.


No one is pressing this case more than you. Pick a new paradigm, they're free for the taking.
Spexxvet • Mar 2, 2011 11:36 am
Big Sarge;714130 wrote:
... You'll never win with all of these yankee women.


Like A-Rod.
monster • Mar 2, 2011 1:13 pm
footfootfoot;714208 wrote:
No one is pressing this case more than you. Pick a new paradigm, they're free for the taking.


If they're free I'll take two!



...this post in memory of Reg
Shawnee123 • Mar 2, 2011 1:15 pm
You'd kind of need two to have a pair...duh!
monster • Mar 2, 2011 1:20 pm
No, I want two paradigms.

and fork handles

[YOUTUBE]Cz2-ukrd2VQ[/YOUTUBE]
Sundae • Mar 2, 2011 2:54 pm
One of my Dad's favourite (and most posted) comedy sketches.
I doubt a month goes by without him saying four candles.
DanaC • Mar 2, 2011 3:42 pm
Did you see him on WILTY? Sooo funny. His story was that he had actually had to go and ask in a shop for four candles.
Big Sarge • Mar 2, 2011 9:09 pm
Not only have we got all of these damn-yankees (my momma always said it as one word), we've got all of these wild foreign women on here too. We're doomed.
Bullitt • Mar 2, 2011 9:27 pm
Big Sarge;714376 wrote:
Not only have we got all of these damn-yankees (my momma always said it as one word), we've got all of these wild foreign women on here too. We're doomed.


Image
monster • Mar 2, 2011 9:46 pm
I'm the only alien, though.....
BigV • Mar 2, 2011 9:47 pm
monster;714117 wrote:
snip--
And yes, when you say "If you are not offended by that you shouldn't be offended by this" you are "telling them how to think"


cite.
monster • Mar 2, 2011 10:40 pm
expand.
Aliantha • Mar 2, 2011 11:18 pm
I suspect what he actually meant was, "Why would you be offended by this but not by that?", which was basically the gist of the whole OP anyway.

I can see how you could choose to interpret it as a suggestion of how one should think, but if you choose to be reasonable, it's pretty clear that that was not the intent.
monster • Mar 2, 2011 11:29 pm
Aliantha;714395 wrote:
I can see how you could choose to interpret it as a suggestion of how one should think, but if you choose to be blinkered by a wish to avoid unpleasantness/anybody taking a mild dislike to you at all costs, it's pretty clear that that was not the intent.


ftfy :rolleyes:
Aliantha • Mar 2, 2011 11:45 pm
I don't think being reasonable means you're blinkered by a wish to avoid unpleasantness/anybody taking a mild dislike to you at all costs.

Anyway, who comes here for unpleasantness? I mean specifically looking for it? Anyone?
monster • Mar 2, 2011 11:54 pm
Safariists?

But I was really disputing your interpretation of "reasonable"
Aliantha • Mar 2, 2011 11:58 pm
Yeah I know you were. I think you're smart enough to know what I meant by reasonable though. I don't need to explain it to you. :)
monster • Mar 3, 2011 12:17 am
No you don't. But I disagree. I think my interpretation is the "reasonable" one. :D
Aliantha • Mar 3, 2011 12:22 am
Yeah, I know that too.
monster • Mar 3, 2011 12:26 am
Careful, we might be scaring people here......
Aliantha • Mar 3, 2011 12:27 am
Either that or the chat police will stop by and give us a move on order.
ZenGum • Mar 3, 2011 12:36 am
If someone really was offended by those relatively tame pics ... HTFU, princess. Or get off the internet. Or at least the bits marked NSFW.

If gravedigger is upset by someone claiming to be offended, HTFU, princess. Or get off the internet.

As a wise dwellar once said, take your licks and move on.
Aliantha • Mar 3, 2011 12:40 am
Gee Zen, did you have a bad day today mate? You're not your usual jovial self at all.
ZenGum • Mar 3, 2011 6:13 am
I'm fine, thanks, I'm just trying to throw a bucket of common sense over this little tiff.
Griff • Mar 3, 2011 6:37 am
I'm just glad to see folks are making an attempt to shake off the February doldrums.

[youtube]WlBiLNN1NhQ[/youtube]
Bullitt • Mar 3, 2011 7:39 am
ZenGum;714445 wrote:
If someone really was offended by those relatively tame pics ... HTFU, princess. Or get off the internet. Or at least the bits marked NSFW.

If gravedigger is upset by someone claiming to be offended, HTFU, princess. Or get off the internet.

As a wise dwellar once said, take your licks and move on.


QFT
Shawnee123 • Mar 3, 2011 8:48 am
Grav, I know this means little coming from me (the one who's "depresseder" than anyone else) but I can tell you that I think I've felt similar to how you're feeling right now.

I've been where I think the whole place is plotting against me. I think that I'm all alone, and I interpret everything as an affront to me.

In retrospect, I've been able to see what is on "me" and what is just "we're all different." Who knows, next week I could be totally pissed off again, but as of late I've been better able to realize that not everyone is going to agree with me or like my style (you can imagine my disbelief when I realized "WHAT? Not everyone on earth likes me? WTF?) ;)

I think people have been really straight on with you about getting the heck over it and moving on. I think that people have maybe held back a little with me when I've gone over the top. I don't know if that's a guy/girl sensitivity, or something else. It's possible that because I've shown that beneath all the tough talk is a sensitive person: I wear my heart on my sleeve so it's all pretty much out there.

If I can play devil's advocate for a moment, maybe your PMer had a point: women have a lot more to offer than just ass and boobies. By extension, you have a lot more to offer than showing your grand appreciation of ass and boobies. You've often cracked me up. You've made me smile...I still think about your pics of the birdie in your yard. I've railed against getting attention because of what we look like. The Cellar, unlike most other forums, and I've dated other forums, places great emphasis on personality. We don't have crazy moving avatars or entire pages devoted to the latest hot naked chick. Because we're so much more than that. I think you're more than that.

So, please get to taking pictures of the birdies in your yard. It's almost spring. I'm not advocating that nekkidness go away...just remember that the dwellars are, or have, wives and mothers and sisters and daughters and aunts.

The whole "why does this offend but that doesn't" is a fair question. Frankly, I wouldn't give you 20 cents for those sorts of pics of anyone. Sheldon, too, has much more to offer. I don't get it, but some do...so there's that difference. But a constant barrage when, again, you've offered much more...well, it's tiresome. I can click beyond those posts, just as I click the stupid word association thread to get it off my "new posts" lists, but it doesn't hurt to be mindful of a large percentage of what you post.

Me, I'll go back to attempting to be funny. ;)
glatt • Mar 3, 2011 9:20 am
Shawnee123;714476 wrote:
I think people have been really straight on with you about getting the heck over it and moving on.


This.

Grav, I enjoy your posts, but you're going off the deep end lately. Come back.
TheMercenary • Mar 3, 2011 10:04 am
Gravdigr;713845 wrote:
[COLOR="Red"][SIZE="4"]***THIS POST CONTAINS LINKS TO CELLAR POSTS THAT ARE NSFW***[/SIZE][/COLOR]

First: Again, let me say right off, there was no intention to offend anyone. But someone was offended. By this. But, not, apparently, by this. Really? Offended by this, but, I guess, not offended by this. Really? Offended by stuff like this. But, not stuff like this. Really?

Perhaps you aren't aware that NFSW means Not Safe For Work. That means some people may find the content offensive or unsuitable for viewing in the workplace.

Yet again, I'm sorry you were offended by my postings.


None of it was offensive to me. And the first link, she was hot! :thumb:
TheMercenary • Mar 3, 2011 10:08 am
Big Sarge;714130 wrote:
I'd just give up on trying to figure out the whys and what fors. Face it, you'll always be wrong because you are a male and you are from the South. You'll never win with all of these yankee women.


Ain't that the damm truth. I am not even from around these parts and I get that treatment on occassion.
monster • Mar 3, 2011 10:51 am
OK I looked at the links. Here's why, specifically (and Glatt covered some of this in one of your other whine threads in Meta, and Shawnee hit the nail also)

Firstly, you seem to be using the word "offended" when you really mean "pissed off by". they are not the same thing.

You posted two images of scantily clad women in the WTF NSFW thread. They are not "offensive" in themselves to most people, I would say. But they are most definitely not WTF images. There is nothing overly special about those women. Most dwellars do not come to the cellar for that stuff, so it does annoy them -and shawnee's comments about wives daughters and objectifying women is an appropriate point here....

You compare those with (a) a picture of a guy with an enormous dick. That is somewhat WTF, as is the expression on the other guy's face. And it's funny. And it's NSFW. But it definitely has a WTF element. and (b) NSFW picture of a dwellar in the Dwellar NSFW thread. That's doing exactly what is says on the tin. Just because you don't like the penis doesn't mean the pic is inappropriate or offensive where it is.

And your final comparison. Again, the picture you posted not WTF at all. But the post as a whole is mean-spirited and not remotely interesting or amusing. Take Shawnee's comment about mothers/wives and apply it to parents/grandparents. Many of us here are parents, grandparents, we are or know and love and respect seniors. What were you trying to say with that pic? and for the picture you compared it with, see comment (b) above.

It's not the images that are offensive, it's not about nudity and sex, it's your attitude that's offensive, it's about what you are communicating when you post those pics in the places you post them. Seriously, what are you trying to say when you post these images? You want to post pics of scantily clad women because you enjoy them -make a thread for it. In fact there's probably one of Drax's lying around somewhere you can adopt. Personally I'd rather you did that on another forum because I am not interested in that or the sort of viewers it might attract the the forum, but that's not my call. It's yours and the community as a whole. You want to make fun of older people by posting pics of them getting frisky and ridiculing them? Fine. I'm glad you showed your true colors before I wasted too much time on you. That was pretty offensive. Again, not the pic, but the post. You have some growing up to do.

It ain't what you do it's the way that you do it.

And you are not the only person who's suffered kangaroo court justice in here (although as I see it you're the one creating this drama rather than the community). In my memory there's been me, merc, bigv, tiki, shawnee, spexx, lumberjim, tw, radar, classic, shawnee, UG, marichiko(?), emma, drax/datalyss ...and more on the receiving end at one time or another. Whether we feel that our treatment was just or unjust, we get over it and get on with it, or we leave or get banned and aren't so much missed. But it ain't just you -you're not as special as all that.

Now can we please be done with this crap?
footfootfoot • Mar 3, 2011 2:45 pm
monster;714508 wrote:
You have some growing up to do.

edited for salience.

This is evident by "As usual I'm wrong no matter what the fuck the problem is EVER, I'm wrong. Looks like I'm just wrong all the fucking time. I was just born to be wrong I guess." :violin:

a) It's all about me
b) Even if it's not all about me, it's all about me
c) It's absolutely all about me all of the time
Sundae • Mar 3, 2011 3:00 pm
Monster you missed out Fresh and Cloud, both of whom had big issues with the supposed cliques when they joined. I clashed with both of them. We don't see Fresh so much now, but I do check his posts when he swings by, even if I decide he's talking rubbish :)

And Cloud is now a veteran and I post in a lot of long-terms threads initiated by her.

I'm slow to change, but loyal once I have.
HungLikeJesus • Mar 6, 2011 9:08 pm
Hang on, Fresh doesn't swing bi, does he?
footfootfoot • Mar 6, 2011 9:23 pm
HungLikeJesus;715267 wrote:
Hang on, Fresh doesn't swing bi, does he?


Maybe that one time when his GFs bro got him drunk, but not as a rule, I don't think.
monster • Mar 6, 2011 10:02 pm
I notice WhinMoar has't come back to this thread yet, although he's thrown a pissy-fit/pretending-like-he-gets-it-cock/monster-bitching moment in pretty much every other one.....

I await with baited breath :rolleyes: (can we take the FTFY on the "baited breath" as a given?)
footfootfoot • Mar 7, 2011 12:21 am
ok chum
monster • Mar 7, 2011 12:50 am
chumbucket is my favorite endearment
footfootfoot • Mar 7, 2011 9:11 am
that would be an excellent hobo name for you
monster • Mar 7, 2011 10:01 am
the whole phrase or just the chumbucket bit?

Chumbucket Endearment. Could also be my stripper name
Shawnee123 • Mar 7, 2011 10:03 am
Chumbucket Endearment.


Is that, like, a Debra Winger movie?

I like An Offal-sir and a Gentleman.
Sundae • Mar 7, 2011 12:11 pm
monster;715279 wrote:
I await with baited breath :rolleyes: (can we take the FTFY on the "baited breath" as a given?)

bated
Sheldonrs • Mar 7, 2011 12:23 pm
monster;715331 wrote:
the whole phrase or just the chumbucket bit?

Chumbucket Endearment. Could also be my stripper name


Only if you take the "h" out.
monster • Mar 7, 2011 12:54 pm
footfootfoot;715292 wrote:
ok chum


Sundae Girl;715356 wrote:
bated


Yeah, I think footie beat you to it by a good 12 hours :rolleyes:

typo trolls try to be timely, ta.

Sundae Girl;715220 wrote:
Tried to make Rabbit Krispie cakes.
I had an issue with the correct Krispie-to-chocolate ratio, they didn't bind properly and cooled down far too quickly, so thay started shedding.



they.

glass houses? kthxbai
Shawnee123 • Mar 7, 2011 12:58 pm
Shawnee123;715332 wrote:
Is that, like, a Debra Winger movie?

I like An Offal-sir and a Gentleman.


:kisspink:

Do I need to explain it, or are you not content with my content?
monster • Mar 7, 2011 1:07 pm
I'm still coming to terms with it.
Shawnee123 • Mar 7, 2011 1:10 pm
I thought it was my funniest of the year, to date. I'm highly disappointed in the reception. I thought there would be hors d'oeuvres. Hmmph.
monster • Mar 7, 2011 1:14 pm
there are certainly whores but their oeuvres are nothing special.
Shawnee123 • Mar 7, 2011 1:16 pm
They're not oeuvrelating? And still they're barren all?

Huzzies.
Sundae • Mar 7, 2011 1:32 pm
I didn't realise it was simply a typo, many intelligent people don't know the difference because it's an anachronism.
I am not so petty to pick up on just something typed incorrectly, only where I think it might help.

But hey, thanks for searching out my problem with the word thay.
I could have embarrassed myself for years with that :p:
monster • Mar 7, 2011 1:41 pm
You can give me the benefit of the doubt next time, then. You have the wrong type of their somewhere recently too, in case you lose sleep over it, but I couldn't be arsed to look further back to make a point. Even geniuseseses type the wrong homonym sometimes, doesn't mean they don't know the difference, just means there thought processes were way ahead of they're fingers ;)
jimhelm • Mar 7, 2011 1:47 pm
ooo!
Sundae • Mar 7, 2011 1:48 pm
Your probably rite.
But excuse me for pointing it out, you obviously mean genii, as you are reffering to the qaulities of an indiivdaul.
Wheres' UG when I knead him?

Anyway, color me unoffended.
Gravdigr • Mar 7, 2011 1:55 pm
footfootfoot;714610 wrote:
edited for salience.

This is evident by "As usual I'm wrong no matter what the fuck the problem is EVER, I'm wrong. Looks like I'm just wrong all the fucking time. I was just born to be wrong I guess." :violin:

a) It's all about me
b) Even if it's not all about me, it's all about me
c) It's absolutely all about me all of the time


How'd you get your head that far up your ass with your shoulder all fucked up? I would've thought it would take both hands...
Gravdigr • Mar 7, 2011 1:55 pm
monster;715279 wrote:
I notice WhinMoar has't come back to this thread yet, although he's thrown a pissy-fit/pretending-like-he-gets-it-cock/monster-bitching moment in pretty much every other one.....

I await with baited breath :rolleyes: (can we take the FTFY on the "baited breath" as a given?)


I notice ShitStirring Bitch hasn't left.
monster • Mar 7, 2011 1:56 pm
handhandhand
Shawnee123 • Mar 7, 2011 2:02 pm
Eh, fuck it. I'm headed for HOLLYWOOD.

(slings kerchief on a stick over back, and sets out for the west.)
Sheldonrs • Mar 7, 2011 2:05 pm
Shawnee123;715396 wrote:
Eh, fuck it. I'm headed for HOLLYWOOD.

(slings kerchief on a stick over back, and sets out for the west.)


WINNING!!!
Sundae • Mar 7, 2011 2:09 pm
Anybody out there in Hollywood believe in kissing anymore?
Maybe Shawnee will.
monster • Mar 7, 2011 2:27 pm
Shawnee123;715396 wrote:
Eh, fuck it. I'm headed for HOLLYWOOD.

(slings kerchief on a stick over back, and sets out for the west.)


I paid homage ....or are you just Wingering this?
Shawnee123 • Mar 7, 2011 2:29 pm
No, I clearly saw you pay Homer. :mad:

(trudge trudge trudge...damn, I should've grabbed my car...trudge trudge trudge)
monster • Mar 7, 2011 2:34 pm
I most certainly do not have to pay Homer. He pays me, if you must know.
Shawnee123 • Mar 7, 2011 2:36 pm
I saw something changing handhandhands.
monster • Mar 7, 2011 2:44 pm
Oh that was the captain

Image
Sundae • Mar 7, 2011 2:44 pm
Hang on, is that Kali dragged up>
Shawnee123 • Mar 7, 2011 2:45 pm
:lol2:

Sumbitch, quit outfunnying me.
monster • Mar 7, 2011 2:45 pm
OK, now you've lost me -Kali?
monster • Mar 7, 2011 2:47 pm
Shawnee123;715426 wrote:
:lol2:

Sumbitch, quit outfunnying me.


Sorry, i'm avoiding cleaning the kitchen. And doing more laundry.

Off to investgate the black hole knickers right now.....
Sundae • Mar 7, 2011 2:47 pm
Indian Goddess - lots of arms (and therefore hands) also Goddess of War.
Sheldonrs • Mar 7, 2011 2:48 pm
monster;715427 wrote:
OK, now you've lost me -Kali?


Multi-armed hindu Goddess, i think.
Shawnee123 • Mar 7, 2011 2:54 pm
It looks like G.I.A.S.L. Joe.

I think I see an "e" and a "c."
Sundae • Mar 7, 2011 3:02 pm
He'd be great in high rise rescue situations - he's well prepared to toss himself off.
monster • Mar 7, 2011 3:16 pm
Sundae Girl;715429 wrote:
Indian Goddess - lots of arms (and therefore hands) also Goddess of War.


thanks. I should've got that..... I guess I was worrying about the knickers.....
footfootfoot • Mar 7, 2011 4:02 pm
Sundae Girl;715436 wrote:
He'd be great in high rise rescue situations - he's well prepared to toss himself off.


that was uncalled for.
Sundae • Mar 7, 2011 4:36 pm
Have I just been red-Kali'd?