June 25, 2010: Kitty's 9th Life

xoxoxoBruce • Jun 25, 2010 1:23 am
Better get a dog... or a Mongoose.

Image
BigV • Jun 25, 2010 2:00 am
weird.

you just never see the pussy going into the snake.
zippyt • Jun 25, 2010 3:34 am
That Sir is fucked UP !!!
SPUCK • Jun 25, 2010 4:57 am
Mongi only work with cobras - the slowest of them all.

I new a herpetologist who'd tested the theory and found... boas love to eat mongooses.

I don't recognize that snake model. Seems sort of Australian but I dono.

I'm having a hard time understanding this picture. If it was a constrictor why and how would it be up 8 ft in the rafters somewhere a cat wouldn't be - with a cat? They don't back up once they attack. So it wouldn't back back up into the rafters after being on the floor making a kill. :confused:


This makes it all too clear.. It wasn't the dingos. :D
Pie • Jun 25, 2010 9:13 am
Aren't Friday pics supposed to be "awwwwww..." not :cry:?


Totally harshed my morning.
classicman • Jun 25, 2010 9:14 am
I'm too upset at the poor kitty to be mad at xob.
classicman • Jun 25, 2010 9:15 am
For Pie ....

Image
ZenGum • Jun 25, 2010 9:37 am
:lol: @ classic.


Uh, yeah it is kinda grim.

I can't say if that snake is Aussie or not, but it isn't a carpet python which is our most common python.
fargon • Jun 25, 2010 9:40 am
Thats not even nice, all I can think about is that poor kitty.
newtimer • Jun 25, 2010 10:26 am
Lacking any rope, Mittens killed a snake, tied it into a noose, and jumped off the highest rafter he could find. Ever since his owner had him fixed ('broken' is more like it, thought Mittens), he found he had lost the will to live any more.
Clodfobble • Jun 25, 2010 10:27 am
SPUCK wrote:
I'm having a hard time understanding this picture. If it was a constrictor why and how would it be up 8 ft in the rafters somewhere a cat wouldn't be - with a cat? They don't back up once they attack. So it wouldn't back back up into the rafters after being on the floor making a kill.


I dunno about that particular breed of snake, but my (much smaller) ball pythons would often strike downward to pick the mouse up off the tank floor if they were already up in their little climby branches when it was feeding time. They wouldn't deliberately climb up there for an attack, but they spent a lot of time just hanging out up there, so it was an even chance it was faster to just reach down and grab the food. What's more, once they made the initial snatch, they would often recoil backwards in order to get more strength behind their grip or sometimes extra wraps around the mouse if the little guy was a fighter.

Also, what in the world makes you say a cat wouldn't be in the rafters? You only have cats with no legs or something?
Shawnee123 • Jun 25, 2010 10:30 am
A good image of the day would be someone with gangrene of the genitals slicing their wrist with a butter knife while spiders crawl on their face and a giant clown lady barfs on them.
monster • Jun 25, 2010 10:36 am
Shawnee123;666285 wrote:
A good image of the day would be someone with gangrene of the genitals slicing their wrist with a butter knife while spiders crawl on their face and a giant clown lady barfs on them.


check your PMs.......
spudcon • Jun 25, 2010 10:37 am
Great idea Shawnee! I'll get on it right away!:D
monster • Jun 25, 2010 10:38 am
Maybe the cat isn't quite dead in that pic.... maybe the camera person snapped a quick shot to aid the vetinary paramedics and then rushed to rescue the poor wee thing? See, it's waving.....
classicman • Jun 25, 2010 11:08 am
Ok so the cat repeatedly refused to clean the floor. Therefore mother snake had to take thing into her own hands, so to speak and force the cat to get the job done. Clearly the snake brought the cat up there just so that it could reach the mop.
spudcon • Jun 25, 2010 11:16 am
And the good witch said "Now you can all live in harmony, happily ever after." The End.
Spexxvet • Jun 25, 2010 11:22 am
monster;666288 wrote:
Maybe the cat isn't quite dead in that pic.... maybe the camera person snapped a quick shot to aid the vetinary paramedics and then rushed to rescue the poor wee thing? See, it's waving.....


It's reaching for its tag team partner
Image
xirene • Jun 25, 2010 2:27 pm
I've been a daily visitor to the IotD for about 5 yrs now, and this is my first comment, sadly to say that I will probably not be back.

You should have put a warning on this photo. This completely messed up my morning. I'm used to the Friday IotD being a cute or at the very least interesting animal photo, not a snuff shot.

You really failed here. Tasteless does not begin to describe the photo.
monster • Jun 25, 2010 2:30 pm
Would you have felt the same if the cat had a limp snake in it's mouth?

I still maintain the cat's not dead. yet.

A warning might've been nice, though.
classicman • Jun 25, 2010 2:44 pm
... agreed. This image was quite out of character for what most have come to expect as the IotD on a Friday..

@xirene - That being said, I think to make such a harsh decision based upon one out of thousands - seems a bit, no, way over the top.
lookout123 • Jun 25, 2010 2:52 pm
newtimer;666283 wrote:
Lacking any rope, Mittens killed a snake, tied it into a noose, and jumped off the highest rafter he could find. Ever since his owner had him fixed ('broken' is more like it, thought Mittens), he found he had lost the will to live any more.
Freakin hilarious spin on a grim situation. Love it.
lumberjim • Jun 25, 2010 3:03 pm
xirene;666330 wrote:
I've been a daily visitor to the IotD for about 5 yrs now, and this is my first comment, sadly to say that I will probably not be back.

You should have put a warning on this photo. This completely messed up my morning. I'm used to the Friday IotD being a cute or at the very least interesting animal photo, not a snuff shot.

You really failed here. Tasteless does not begin to describe the photo.


Interesting commentary. A shame that you've taken and taken and taken over these 5 years, and never had the decency to say thanks...

and yet, the first time you get upset, you are motivated to whine and cry about it. I'm very dissapointed in YOU. glad you're leaving. don't let the door hit your weak pointless ass.
lookout123 • Jun 25, 2010 3:06 pm
Hey LJ, maybe we should start a thread to discuss the problem of bloodsucking lurkers and how to fix the problem. could you work on that for us?
lumberjim • Jun 25, 2010 3:13 pm
My theory is that most lurkers are democrats and communists.
lookout123 • Jun 25, 2010 3:20 pm
Absolutely, as evidenced by the fact that they suck and hate america. [COLOR="White"]Counting down the 3 minutes until Redux posts a government paid study refuting this premise.[/COLOR]
Diaphone Jim • Jun 25, 2010 3:41 pm
We haven't had a graphic caution in a looong time (if you don't count the fako velvet painting of the monkey and the leopard). I wonder if one here would have kept anyone away, especially xirene (who apparently joined today to say goodbye) and usually tougher shawnee.
I would have looked anyway, thought medium-yuck and enthusiastically gone on to read these comments.
The photo is quite a few places on the web, but with never an explanation, except for maybe Australia and maybe python.
Most predators have a pretty good eye for what to kill, sometimes called a prey image or picture. While the extent of the snake is hard to determine, it looks as if he has bitten off more than he can chew, so to speak.
I would not be surprised to find that they were both dead and then set up.
Shawnee123 • Jun 25, 2010 3:47 pm
Huh? What did I do? :cool:

At least my joke was remotely funny! :lol:
squirell nutkin • Jun 25, 2010 4:09 pm
We identify with cats to a greater degree than snakes it seems. Fact is on this planet, every one and everything lives at the expense of something else's life. Something has to die so that you can live.

Still, what makes that a sad picture is two fold:

1. Most of us identify with the cat
2. The death of the cat did not increase the number of pictures of naked chicks.
Cloud • Jun 25, 2010 8:48 pm
seriously awful.
HungLikeJesus • Jun 25, 2010 9:02 pm
I think the title was sufficient warning.
Flint • Jun 25, 2010 9:06 pm
Oh crap! A useless, non-contributing leach was needlessly upset during the passive consumption of their daily FREE entertainment. Well, luckily I know something about the internet. NOBODY who says they "are leaving" REALLY leaves. Especially a worthless, do-nothing lurker whose existence serves no discernable purpose. I happen to know that "xirene" will be back around, time and time again, to see the result of their childish little tirade.

By the way, if this image "ruins your day" then you seriously need to go see a physician to correct the chemical imbalances that are wreaking havoc upon your already enfeebled brain tissue. A strong, well-adjusted person such as myself looks at that image and says "That's life!"
jinx • Jun 25, 2010 9:15 pm
Yeah!
And don't forget to hit the tip jar!
squirell nutkin • Jun 25, 2010 9:44 pm
Yeah!
And don't let the tip jar hit your ass on the way out!

What jinx said.
Flint • Jun 25, 2010 9:55 pm
Don't end up with the tip jar up your ass!
ZenGum • Jun 25, 2010 10:01 pm
A strong, well-adjusted person such as myself looks at that image and says "That's [strike]life[/strike] death!"


Just sayin.
Flint • Jun 25, 2010 10:03 pm
Life is death. Death is life.
ZenGum • Jun 25, 2010 10:13 pm
True freedom is doing what you are told. Flint is sane.
Pie • Jun 25, 2010 10:53 pm
Flint;666455 wrote:
Life is death. Death is life.


Flint;666428 wrote:
By the way, if this image "ruins your day" then you seriously need to go see a physician to correct the chemical imbalances that are wreaking havoc upon your already enfeebled brain tissue. A strong, well-adjusted person such as myself looks at that image and says "That's life!"



Death makes me sad. Sorry if you think I'm unhinged.
Flint • Jun 25, 2010 11:11 pm
No, you're cool. You didn't pull the crybaby "I'm leaving" routine like xirene.
squirell nutkin • Jun 25, 2010 11:13 pm
monster;666331 wrote:
Would you have felt the same if the cat had a limp snake in it's mouth?

I still maintain the cat's not dead yet; it's pining for the fjords.
xoxoxoBruce • Jun 25, 2010 11:24 pm
I checked with Hallmark, they don't have an apology card for that image, so suck it up.
monster • Jun 25, 2010 11:32 pm
They don't? If anyone has Hallmark shares... SELL!

Meanwhile...

Sometimes the cats in our lives
Get taken from us by surprise
But a snake in the hand
Is worth 12 bucks a pound
So cheer up and see the bright side
aero geek • Jun 25, 2010 11:57 pm
It is just an image of one animal (possibly) killing another one. The end. It's just nature. There are no evil animals as far as I can tell and I don't get how someone can claim that there was something wrong with that image which is merely a momentary observation of nature. I also wonder if xirene is a meat eater and realizes what animals go through just before they are slaughtered. Reading IOTD for five years and now going to stop because of one post? Yeah, right!:eyebrow:
xoxoxoBruce • Jun 25, 2010 11:59 pm
She's rather hang out on Deviant Art.
dezireless • Jun 25, 2010 11:59 pm
I just joined today. Death and empathy are a funny thing. Too often we accuse the predator of being the bad guy when even we ourselves take the role of snakes. The predator prey relationship predates the concepts of good and evil. :yeldead:
spudcon • Jun 26, 2010 12:02 am
lumberjim;666340 wrote:
My theory is that most lurkers are democrats and communists.

Lumberjim nails it again!:thumb:
lumberjim • Jun 26, 2010 12:03 am
it's what I do.

:: takes a bow ::
xoxoxoBruce • Jun 26, 2010 12:04 am
Welcome to the Cellar, dezireless. :D

Not you, spudcon. :p:
HungLikeJesus • Jun 26, 2010 12:40 am
It's just WWF.

Relax.
SPUCK • Jun 26, 2010 5:00 am
That snake was hired by one of the two hundred slaughtered bird's relatives that were killed by the cat - merely for 'entertainment'. It was just a balancing of the books.
toranokaze • Jun 26, 2010 5:37 am
Shawnee123;666285 wrote:
A good image of the day would be someone with gangrene of the genitals slicing their wrist with a butter knife while spiders crawl on their face and a giant clown lady barfs on them.


Shawnee just when I think I'm into the weirdest shit you have to go and up the ante


And Cat it is whats for dinner
Pie • Jun 26, 2010 8:30 am
HungLikeJesus;666509 wrote:
It's just WWF.

Relax.

Nuh uh.

The WWF is the World Wide Fund for Nature.
Image



World Wrestling Entertainment is the WWE:
Image



Don't fuck with the panda.
squirell nutkin • Jun 26, 2010 2:26 pm
.
Cicero • Jun 26, 2010 2:26 pm
Sick. Sometimes I find the natural world to be sick and repulsive. So why am I so apt and ready to defend it all the time?
Move along/ off quasi-rant.
squirell nutkin • Jun 26, 2010 2:40 pm
Too much Disney at an impressionable age. Don't feel bad, it has happened to all of us.
ogwen69 • Jun 26, 2010 3:22 pm
<delurk>

Been reading this for years, love the site - miss it when I'm on holiday, occasionally post.

Animals kill animals to eat. I pay people to kill cows so I can haz cheezburger. It's how the world works.

Maybe the title could have given a little more warning, I was a little taken aback by the image, maybe 'cat runs out of lives' or something.

I think never visisitng again is a bit of an over reaction. Unfortunatley we don't live in a world where everything is teh fluffeh so, yeah, that's all i've got to say

</relurk>

(p.s. for the pedants I know my html tags don't work even in theory but hey....)
monster • Jun 26, 2010 5:32 pm
<appreciates>
Teh ogwen
</appreciates>
SPUCK • Jun 27, 2010 6:21 am
squirell nutkin;666592 wrote:
.


Image


:rotflol::D:rotflol::D:rotflol::D:rotflol::D:rotflol:
Gravdigr • Jun 27, 2010 2:55 pm
I don't really want to see dead household pets. If I'd posted that picture you people would have clogged the internet to condemn for it.
Gravdigr • Jun 27, 2010 2:59 pm
Flint;666428 wrote:
A strong, well-adjusted person such as myself looks at that image and says "That's life!"


No. No, they don't. That would be a sociopath.
Gravdigr • Jun 27, 2010 3:10 pm
classicman;666269 wrote:
I'm too upset at the poor kitty to be mad at xob.


Oh, hell, who's mad? I, myself, assumed IOTD's were supposed to be SFW. Now, I got my ass handed to me for posting a man's naked thigh & ass cheek in the WTF thread. I find this dead cat pic to be FAR FAR FAR FAR more offensive than a Korean man's ass cheek.

That said, IF I were a snake person, instead of the cat-lover that I am, I might be all "Fuck, yeah! Go snake!", but, I ain't, so, I'm all "Godammit, I didn't need to see that!":blackr:
HungLikeJesus • Jun 27, 2010 3:18 pm
I was much more disturbed by the video of the monkey with the pet frog.
squirell nutkin • Jun 27, 2010 6:14 pm
HungLikeJesus;666820 wrote:
I was much more disturbed by the video of the monkey with the pet frog.


was that another of Shawnee's links?
Flint • Jun 27, 2010 7:27 pm
Flint;666428 wrote:
A strong, well-adjusted person such as myself looks at that image and says "That's life!"
Gravdigr;666816 wrote:
No. No, they don't. That would be a sociopath.

Bullshit. You've never seen a national geographic where the cheetah chases down the gazelle, bites its throat out, and then tears its raw flesh apart and eats it? You're telling me that only a "sociopath" could watch that program objectively??? BULLSHIT. You are dead wrong.
HungLikeJesus • Jun 27, 2010 7:55 pm
squirell nutkin;666854 wrote:
was that another of Shawnee's links?


I don't recall, Senator.
Mayor of Shekou • Jun 27, 2010 9:03 pm
OK, I'm starting to get all riled up over this post. Here I am, hungry as heck, and not one of you has come through with a halfway decent recipe! I mean, come on, think of the opportunity: TWO main ingredients to work with!
classicman • Jun 27, 2010 9:15 pm
squirell nutkin;666854 wrote:
was that another of Shawnee's links?


It was LJ's
HungLikeJesus • Jun 27, 2010 9:43 pm
I've checked all of our books for kitten stuffed snake recipes, but so far nothing.
jinx • Jun 27, 2010 9:46 pm
Couldn't be much different than turducken I would think...
squirell nutkin • Jun 27, 2010 9:47 pm
It's in the one with "Frog a la Peche"
BigV • Jun 27, 2010 11:09 pm
Mayor of Shekou;666881 wrote:
OK, I'm starting to get all riled up over this post. Here I am, hungry as heck, and not one of you has come through with a halfway decent recipe! I mean, come on, think of the opportunity: TWO main ingredients to work with!


hey buddy.... here's a recipe for you, k?

One man
One woman

Bon appetit!

ps, I prefer mine with somewhat less hair, but to each his own.
Gravdigr • Jun 28, 2010 4:49 pm
Flint;666863 wrote:
Bullshit. You've never seen a national geographic where the cheetah chases down the gazelle, bites its throat out, and then tears its raw flesh apart and eats it? You're telling me that only a "sociopath" could watch that program objectively??? BULLSHIT. You are dead wrong.


I don't have a pet gazelle.

We're talking about household pets, not animals living in the wild.

And I am not wrong. I have a different opinion.
BigV • Jun 28, 2010 5:25 pm
Good point, Gravdigr. I especially like your correct distinction about your opinion.
Spexxvet • Jun 28, 2010 5:47 pm
lookout123;666343 wrote:
Absolutely, as evidenced by the fact that they suck and hate america.


No, that would be vampires and muslims.
lumberjim • Jun 28, 2010 6:13 pm
Gravdigr;666816 wrote:
No. No, they don't. That would be a sociopath.


this is you telling Flint he's wrong AND he's a sociopath.
Flint;666863 wrote:
Bullshit. You've never seen a national geographic where the cheetah chases down the gazelle, bites its throat out, and then tears its raw flesh apart and eats it? You're telling me that only a "sociopath" could watch that program objectively??? BULLSHIT. You are dead wrong.


Gravdigr;667076 wrote:
I don't have a pet gazelle.

We're talking about household pets, not animals living in the wild.

edit: In My Opinion.... sorry... almost forgot that part!
And I am not wrong. I have a different opinion.


Flint is refuting that he is a sociopath here.

BigV;667096 wrote:
Good point, Gravdigr. I especially like your correct distinction about your opinion.


On an unrelated note, this is BigV acting like a cunt as usual.

edit: In My Opinion! almost forgot that bit...
squirell nutkin • Jun 28, 2010 10:03 pm
Spexxvet;667103 wrote:
No, that would be vampires and muslims.


OOOH! New film genre! Vampire Muslims. We already have Nazi Zombies, so Vampire Muslims is the next logical step.
SPUCK • Jun 29, 2010 6:07 am
New movies coming out:
Pride and Prejudice and Zombies
Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter
(seriously!)
stevecrm • Jun 29, 2010 7:36 am
mi-OWWWWW
Sundae • Jun 29, 2010 7:59 am
SPUCK;667215 wrote:
New movies coming out:
Pride and Prejudice and Zombies

This is one film that I expect to enjoy as much - if not more - than the book.
BigV • Jun 29, 2010 1:25 pm
Sundae Girl;667225 wrote:
This is one film that I expect to enjoy as much - if not more - than the book.


Agreed.

And by agreed, I mean an utterly self-evident gross understatement.
BigV • Jun 29, 2010 1:30 pm
dezireless;666488 wrote:
snip -- The predator prey relationship predates the concepts of good and evil. :yeldead:

This is one *funny* sentence!!!
Gravdigr • Jun 29, 2010 5:39 pm
Lumberjim:
this is you telling Flint he's wrong AND he's a sociopath.


You are right. I stand corrected. I apologize Flint.<---This is me saying I was wrong.

Now. This ---> is me saying a person has got to be fucked up in the goddamned head to not be at least somewhat affected by a household pet being shown dead and dangling from the jaws of whatever killed it. Be the pet a cat, dog, or a parakeet (which I hate by the way, but I still will be at least somewhat affected when a pic of one dangling from the jaws of a warthog shows up.) I may not breakdown in tears or start a Save-The-Parakeets foundation, but I ain't gonna lie to myself and say "That's life.":rant:
lumberjim • Jun 29, 2010 6:06 pm
but it IS life.

I wish it was the cat that is STILL eating my trash!
Flint • Jun 29, 2010 6:06 pm
We can either try to shelter ourselves from the reality of life, or we can embrace it fully. And, after all, we really have no choice--this is the world we live in! The Native Americans worshipped the spirits of the animals they consumed...lazy modern man doesn't even stop to consider that this meat was ever part of a living creature. Life IS death, because to LIVE we must EAT. To EAT is to KILL (whether you hide this reality from yourself, or not). [SIZE="1"]And, yes, vegetables are alive too. If you eat the ROOT of a plant you have taken its life in an irreparable way.[/SIZE]

Snakes live, snakes eat, snakes kill. Cats live, cats eat, cats kill. Man lives, man eats, man kills. If this bothers you, you are literally having a schizophrenic break with REALITY.

You keep saying "household pet" as if that distinction exempts them from the reality of life. It doesn't! Nor are YOU exempt.

You keep saying what kind of reaction a person should have to a PICTURE of this situation. Well, let me tell you, the time that I found my dog (whom I had literally raised from birth, including bottle feedings and the whole nine yards) dead on the lawn, next to a dead snake, it pretty much cured me of ever having crybaby, Walt Disney type reactions to a &#402;ucking PHOTOGRAPH of a similar situation. Don't believe me? Look it up--I'm pretty sure I have posted about this before.

When I say "That's life" I MEAN IT goddamnit. THAT. IS. LIFE. If you don't want to accept that then you are choosing to be ignorant. The end.
classicman • Jun 29, 2010 10:04 pm
Uh not to be a wet blanket or anything, but from the cats perspective .... thats death, not life. jussayin
Gravdigr • Jun 30, 2010 1:57 am
I deny your reality, and substitute my own. (I read that somewheres.)
Adak • Jun 30, 2010 2:27 am
No doubt that it is our reality, Flint. That reality's effect on us is definitely on a sliding scale, however. No one is going to be strongly shocked by a carrot or head of lettuce, hanging from a constrictor's tight coils.

When it's a pet, it's a lot more affecting, of course. If it were your child, or spouse, the effect would be incredibly strong.

It's a natural reaction to help us remember "snake's coils are deadly", and stay safe.

Inferences of mental health based on the person's sensitivity to that stimuli, are unfounded. As you've shown, that sensitivity will change, depending on their exposure to it.
xoxoxoBruce • Jun 30, 2010 3:45 am
Awww, reality to harsh?
Is that's what's bothering you Bunkie?
Then have some nice mellow fantacy....

Image
SPUCK • Jun 30, 2010 5:53 am
Um.. yeah.. That brings back fond memories of when that happened to me.
Sundae • Jun 30, 2010 11:44 am
Flint;667396 wrote:
Well, let me tell you, the time that I found my dog (whom I had literally raised from birth

Does this mean picking it up after it's born?
Pete Zicato • Jun 30, 2010 2:22 pm
Flint;667396 wrote:

When I say "That's life" I MEAN IT goddamnit. THAT. IS. LIFE. If you don't want to accept that then you are choosing to be ignorant. The end.

Well, everything is life, isn't it. Unless a picture is 'shopped, it's life.

Does that mean that there is no picture which you would find repugnant?

BTW, I'm _not_ saying you should or shouldn't find this particular picture repugnant. Just trying to ascertain whether anything pictured would push your buttons and where the line would be for you.
Gravdigr • Jun 30, 2010 3:48 pm
He prolly don't have no buttons. Buttons are for pussies. Prolly.
classicman • Jun 30, 2010 4:21 pm
Flintz got stix not buttons - duh!
xoxoxoBruce • Jul 1, 2010 12:27 am
Pete Zicato;667621 wrote:
Does that mean that there is no picture which you would find repugnant?

If you (not pete) find this or any other picture repugnant, move on. Don't piss and moan about how you've been personally assaulted... it's NOT about you.
classicman • Jul 1, 2010 12:37 pm
xoxoxoBruce;667791 wrote:
It's NOT about you.


Damn right bruce! Its all about the kitty! and sometimes the kitty wins.
Image
Flint • Jul 1, 2010 1:06 pm
Adak;667500 wrote:
No doubt that it is our reality, Flint. That reality's effect on us is definitely on a sliding scale, however. No one is going to be strongly shocked by a carrot or head of lettuce, hanging from a constrictor's tight coils.

When it's a pet, it's a lot more affecting, of course. If it were your child, or spouse, the effect would be incredibly strong.

It's a natural reaction to help us remember "snake's coils are deadly", and stay safe.

Inferences of mental health based on the person's sensitivity to that stimuli, are unfounded. As you've shown, that sensitivity will change, depending on their exposure to it.

Thank you. I see that you have understood the actual issue, and have helped to clarify.

You are correct, a person's sensitivity to stimuli will change depending on their exposure to it. Therefore, it seems that a person has two choices when faced with reality, #1: turn away, and choose to remain sheltered and unable to deal with the real world, or #2: assimilate the new information, embrace it, and advance as a person.

You are correct, I was wrong to state this as a mental health issue. It is actually a maturity issue. A mature person will be able to see an image of a natural death (the kind which occurs billions of times every day) and fully understand what it is, what it means...and it will not be traumatic to them.

You are correct, there is a sliding scale upon which people idenify household pets as family members. I subscribe to that. However, it is actually DISRESPECTFUL to the animal to anthropomorphize its psychological characteristics. When I see the image of the snake and the cat, I naturally empathize more with the "victim" in the image. I do not simply, selfishly, regard the animal as a "teddy bear" that lives within my home, but I fully respect that animal as a predator with its own way of living life. I do not believe that the cat as a species is ignorant about the realities of life and death. In empathizing with the cat psychology, I do not apply my own "soft" human feelings. I am actually being MORE sensitive. I am RESPECTING nature, for what it is.

I insist that to be repulsed by this image is to be truly ignorant and immature.
toranokaze • Jul 1, 2010 3:47 pm
This has been a long time coming:


Since the cat is already hung proceed to smoke and dry until jerked
Sever room temp. with light garnish.
squirell nutkin • Jul 1, 2010 4:17 pm
You should read "Cooking with Fernet Branca" I truly think you will enjoy, if not love, it.
Gravdigr • Jul 1, 2010 4:26 pm
Flint;667944 wrote:
Thank you. I see that you have understood the actual issue, and have helped to clarify.

You are correct, a person's sensitivity to stimuli will change depending on their exposure to it. Therefore, it seems that a person has two choices when faced with reality, #1: turn away, and choose to remain sheltered and unable to deal with the real world, or #2: assimilate the new information, embrace it, and advance as a person.

You are correct, I was wrong to state this as a mental health issue. It is actually a maturity issue. A mature person will be able to see an image of a natural death (the kind which occurs billions of times every day) and fully understand what it is, what it means...and it will not be traumatic to them.

You are correct, there is a sliding scale upon which people idenify household pets as family members. I subscribe to that. However, it is actually DISRESPECTFUL to the animal to anthropomorphize its psychological characteristics. When I see the image of the snake and the cat, I naturally empathize more with the "victim" in the image. I do not simply, selfishly, regard the animal as a "teddy bear" that lives within my home, but I fully respect that animal as a predator with its own way of living life. I do not believe that the cat as a species is ignorant about the realities of life and death. In empathizing with the cat psychology, I do not apply my own "soft" human feelings. I am actually being MORE sensitive. I am RESPECTING nature, for what it is.

I insist that to be repulsed by this image is to be truly ignorant and immature.


All this will bite you in the ass one day. God, I wish I could be there to see it.:sniff:


I'm done with this.....................................................................now.
Flint • Jul 1, 2010 6:20 pm
Gravdigr;668051 wrote:
All this will bite you in the ass one day. God, I wish I could be there to see it.:sniff:


I'm done with this.....................................................................now.
What you aren't understanding is that I have already been through this, and come out the other side. I'm not interested in going backwards...
Jilly • Jul 3, 2010 9:01 pm
Wow people. How many dead animals do you pass on the road in a week. And thats live! Do you get all mushy over that? I have been a pet lover and owner all my life and I am amazed at the reaction of some people to this picture. Am I going to hang it on my living room wall? No, but come on, it is an interestesting phototgraph which is what iotd is all about. Right?

<back to lurcking>
lumberjim • Jul 3, 2010 10:12 pm
YOU SPELLED LURKING WRONG!!!
toranokaze • Jul 4, 2010 12:37 am
squirell nutkin;668038 wrote:
You should read "Cooking with Fernet Branca" I truly think you will enjoy, if not love, it.


I will have to check it out
Jilly • Jul 4, 2010 10:39 am
:blush:Jim, typing while drinking never one of my strong suits. Spelled interesting wrong too.
ZenGum • Jul 6, 2010 9:08 am
Hey wait a minute ... has anyone used the

you insensitive bastards my kitteh got eaten by a python on 9/11!


meme yet?
Trilby • Jul 6, 2010 9:30 am
you just did.
Pete Zicato • Jul 6, 2010 11:01 am
Pete Zicato;667621 wrote:
Well, everything is life, isn't it. Unless a picture is 'shopped, it's life.

Does that mean that there is no picture which you would find repugnant?

BTW, I'm _not_ saying you should or shouldn't find this particular picture repugnant. Just trying to ascertain whether anything pictured would push your buttons and where the line would be for you.

Yo, Flint.

Did you miss the question, or don't feel like answering?
ogwen69 • Jul 14, 2010 4:33 pm
<re-delurk>

I'm quite dissapointed that this hasn't degenerated into a proper flamewar - what is the internet coming to!

And no Godwins Law either....

Eh back in the day...

</re-relurks>
classicman • Jul 14, 2010 4:38 pm
Well, I blame you - You got things started and then went off hiding again.
Flint • Jul 14, 2010 4:54 pm
Pete Zicato;668914 wrote:
Yo, Flint.

Did you miss the question, or don't feel like answering?
I'm still thinking about it. Stand by...
Shawnee123 • Jul 14, 2010 10:55 pm
[COLOR="White"].[/COLOR]
ogwen69 • Jul 15, 2010 12:18 pm
*sigh*

Your all gay

and

Where are the upload codez?
Shawnee123 • Jul 15, 2010 12:34 pm
My all gay what? Broadway Revue?
ogwen69 • Jul 17, 2010 3:14 am
tsch tsch shawnee get with your memes linkie anotheerlinkie
Shawnee123 • Jul 17, 2010 8:37 am
ogwen69;671069 wrote:
tsch tsch shawnee get with your memes linkie anotheerlinkie


I'm slipping! :D