monster • Mar 13, 2010 10:39 pm
Spring forward tomorrow in the USA if you part of your state partakes in such shennanigans.
Don't Forget.
Or Else.
Don't Forget.
Or Else.
lumberjim;640763 wrote:Here is me not making a clone thread called [COLOR=Blue]COCKS.[/COLOR]
please. .... hold your applause....
jinx;640744 wrote:Oh for fuck sake! This is bullshit. :bitching:
Bruce 9012;640766 wrote:I cant figure out sun cycles. Or are need to change them.
Technology is not the problem. The problem was Congress that simply changed the 'time change' date. Then technology does not change times properly for two weeks.Shawnee123;640835 wrote:[YOUTUBE]All my clocks set themselves: ... when you don't have to do it yourself you are wary about trusting technology.
tw;640912 wrote:Technology is not the problem. The problem was Congress that simply changed the 'time change' date. Then technology does not change times properly for two weeks.
Worse, the Congress that made that change did so for political reasons - not for any reason based in science.
The practice is controversial.[1] Adding daylight to afternoons benefits retailing, sports, and other activities that exploit sunlight after working hours,[3] but causes problems for farming, evening entertainment and other occupations tied to the sun.[4][5] Traffic fatalities are reduced when there is extra afternoon daylight.[6] Its effect on health and crime is less clear. Although an early goal of DST was to reduce evening usage of incandescent lighting, formerly a primary use of electricity,[7] modern heating and cooling usage patterns differ greatly, and research about how DST currently affects energy use is limited and often contradictory.[8]
Shawnee123;641018 wrote:Heh...that makes sense. That's what I thought about the farmers too...they work all day and night anyway.
So I'm curious as to what the political motivations were (in tw's view) as to why it was moved up earlier this year? Who decides that? What benefits occurred and for whom?
This is something I never would have thought much about before: inquiring minds want to know. :)
glatt;641034 wrote:Michigan had a decent balance and now they are dark in the morning and have a lot of light in the afternoon and early evening.
lumberjim;640763 wrote:Here is me not making a clone thread called [COLOR=Blue]COCKS.[/COLOR]
please. .... hold your applause....
The original purpose of daylight savings was pioneered back in Franklin's time. It had a purpose; getting people out and about earlier when the sun was up earlier. However the latest time change (three weeks earlier) had no basis in science. It was promoted in Congress on some non-peer reviewed conclusion from some professor. Politicians bought into the myth for reasons similar to why consumers buy surge protectors. Advantages of daylight savings time are lost when implemented too close to winter. Implementing daylight savings time three weeks earlier was not based in any science.Shawnee123;641018 wrote:So I'm curious as to what the political motivations were (in tw's view) as to why it was moved up earlier this year? Who decides that? What benefits occurred and for whom?