Jan 4, 2009: Bouba & Kiki

These two white images have names, one is Bouba and the other is Kiki.
Your assignment, should you choose to accept, is to figure out is which is which.




Congratulations, you said Bouba is on the right and Kiki is on the left, right? er, correct?

An example of this is the bouba/kiki effect. In an experiment first designed by Wolfgang Köhler, people are asked to choose which of two shapes is named bouba and which kiki. 95% to 98% of people choose kiki for the angular shape and bouba for the rounded one. Individuals on the island of Tenerife showed a similar preference between shapes called takete and maluma. Even 2.5 year-old children (too young to read) show this effect.

Although that may not be true on the board. :haha:

Ramachandran and Hubbard suggest the kiki/bouba effect has implications for the evolution of language, because the naming of objects is not completely arbitrary. The rounded shape may intuitively be named bouba because the mouth makes a more rounded shape to produce that sound, while a more taut, angular mouth shape is needed to articulate kiki. The sound of K is also harder and more forceful than that of B. Such "synesthesia-like mappings" suggest that this effect might be the neurological basis for sound symbolism, in which sounds are non-arbitrarily mapped to objects and actions in the world.

So now you know why boobs are boobs.

link

Via

I would have named them Pointy and Bill.

Or Bang! and Kapow!

no, no: Bang and Splat

Sturm & Drang? ;)

Tate and Lyle!

UG and radar!

Ouch and anus?

Hmm. My guess was opposit of the research. I guess I tried to assign them male and female traits to the names and named the pointy one the assumed male name and the other to the other. I am in the 2% group.

yeah, we could have told you that, merc

it's "bouba" not "bubba"

whole thing makes perfect sense to me. "kiki" has sharp, staccato sounds which correspond to the sharp, spiky images

It proves that some of our alphabet symbols are synesthetically derived?

Interesting thought! Did we start with the capital

[SIZE=7]M[/SIZE]

and find that the sound was more "rounded", when we created the lower-case

[SIZE=7]m[/SIZE]

?

monster;623373 wrote:

yeah, we could have told you that, merc

:lol:
1. does that make me a two-percenter?
2. am I on report again?

Nope - just an extremist :cool:

classicman;623442 wrote:

Nope - just an extremist :cool:

:lol:

I'm in the 95-98% Group. I wanna be in the 2% group.

Wait a second here, before I commit is that 2% group at the top or the bottom?

Depends on who you ask. :) Once they see I am in it.

I think that's the group in the cage.

with the t-r-o-l-l

classicman;623540 wrote:

Wait a second here, before I commit is that 2% group at the top or the bottom?

Well, let's see. If you are upstanding and moral, depending on who is doing the judging, you are in the upper 2%. If you are a deviant and a ho, then you're in the bottom 2%...again, depends on who is tallying the whacker, so to speak.

Since boobs are bad, if you picked the rounded shape on the right, you're going to Hell, under current strictures. Sorry, I don't make the rules.

Elspode;623638 wrote:

Since boobs are bad

Wait, what the fucking hell???

Who is this really?

Boobs rock. I'm just saying. I have seen a few pairs.

DanaC;623577 wrote:

I think that's the group in the cage.

monster;623636 wrote:

with the t-r-o-l-l

Nope, with the Phantom Flan Flinger! :eek:

jinx;623640 wrote:

Wait, what the fucking hell???

Who is this really?

I was speaking for the Moral Majority.

They are neither.

When I was in college I had a sticker on my VW that said, "Immoral Minority".