Have you ever butt-ƒucked a dead dog in the ass?

Flint • Oct 17, 2009 4:14 pm
Please be honest--this is an anonymous poll.[COLOR="White"] . . . [/COLOR]I'm doing...research.
Henry • Oct 17, 2009 5:27 pm
May we ask where else one would butt-fuck a dog but in the ass?
Elspode • Oct 17, 2009 5:32 pm
Well, she *was* pretty damn ugly, so, yeah. No, wait. She was alive. Just dead drunk.
limey • Oct 17, 2009 5:58 pm
I've just voted no. I wish I could think of a witty reason why!
ZenGum • Oct 17, 2009 7:29 pm
What if it was a dead ass, and I ... in the ...
elSicomoro • Oct 17, 2009 9:01 pm
Hey, Flint has butt-fucked people in the mouth, so...there you go.
monster • Oct 17, 2009 9:10 pm
No but We've just got through thor's birthday party and I could introduce you to an 8yo who most probably would. After he killed it. Beest and I independantly noted that he has mass-murderer tendancies. He is already into stomping on dead birds that he finds in the back yard (thanks demeter) and making his penis the center of attention. butt-fucking dead dogs is probably on tomorrow's to-do list
Tulip • Oct 17, 2009 10:07 pm
what kind of research are you doing, Flint??!!?? :eek: To see how many people would even answer this question? :eyebrow:
smoothmoniker • Oct 17, 2009 10:56 pm
It was only mostly-dead.
Cloud • Oct 17, 2009 11:07 pm
Sometimes I do not like the Cellar.
lumberjim • Oct 17, 2009 11:49 pm
old lady
Cloud • Oct 17, 2009 11:59 pm
yeah? maybe if I'm old enough I'll get dementia and forget shit like this. I should be so lucky.
Juniper • Oct 18, 2009 12:39 am
I'm going to assume it's something metaphorical, and sidle away.
TheDaVinciChode • Oct 18, 2009 2:15 pm
Isn't this title a little... redundant?

I mean, honestly, where else can you butt-fudge a person, or critter?

Unless you're asking whether anyone has ever butt-fudged a dead dog, whilst inside a donkey? Something akin to when Luke Skywalker was placed inside a dead Tauntaun, only with additional bestiality thrown in, for good measure?

Furthermore... Who voted "yes?" ;)
Griff • Oct 18, 2009 4:58 pm
Henry;601630 wrote:
May we ask where else one would butt-fuck a dog but in the ass?


TheDaVinciChode;601781 wrote:
Isn't this title a little... redundant?


You guys are new here.

I'm concerned about the ethical implications. How can a dead dog give consent?
TheDaVinciChode • Oct 18, 2009 6:00 pm
Griff;601816 wrote:
I'm concerned about the ethical implications. How can a dead dog give consent?


Silent consent. Whereby consent is implied, but not verbalised. ;)
Clodfobble • Oct 18, 2009 6:20 pm
It's fine, as long as it's at least 2.6 years old.
bluecuracao • Oct 18, 2009 6:35 pm
The dog, or its corpse? :unsure:
xoxoxoBruce • Oct 18, 2009 8:31 pm
2.6 X 7 = 18.2 ;)
regular.joe • Oct 18, 2009 8:53 pm
Cloud, I sympathize, I can't get these last two minutes back...ever.
monster • Oct 18, 2009 9:03 pm
Sure you can. and with you being in Iraq and all, you may be reliving those two minutes sooner than you think -just live them better the second time around, mmmkay?
sexobon • Oct 19, 2009 3:44 am
This thread is just a feeble attempt by Flint to make dead dogs the new hobos! I'm not buying into it. :headshake
limey • Oct 19, 2009 4:00 am
Well at least it isn't in the "relationships" section!
regular.joe • Oct 19, 2009 4:06 am
monster;601852 wrote:
Sure you can. and with you being in Iraq and all, you may be reliving those two minutes sooner than you think -just live them better the second time around, mmmkay?



I LOLed. Thanks.
monster • Oct 19, 2009 11:26 am
yw. You could even stick googly eyes on them ;) or on the dead dog..... now there's something you could do with the two minutes..... but then that might make them not have been wasted the first time around because then you would have been able to contribute meaningfully to the thread and so then you wouldn't need to relive them differently but then if you didn't relive them differently in the first place then you would need to because you'd still be complaining about them......and then fl1nts head will go asplodey and you'll think it's the enemy set off mortars and you'll shoot them before they get you and then you won't be reliveing those two minutes after all.....
regular.joe • Oct 19, 2009 4:20 pm
You truly have a dizzying intellect.
regular.joe • Oct 19, 2009 4:21 pm
Yea, I'm still lurking around this thread, wasting my time I suppose.
monster • Oct 20, 2009 8:07 am
This thread suggests that Spencer and Darwin's survival of the fittest theories may also be relevant to teh interwebz.
Madman • Oct 27, 2009 10:26 am
:eyebrow:I think I voted no, but I'm not sure.
Sheldonrs • Oct 27, 2009 12:19 pm
monster;602174 wrote:
This thread suggests that Spencer and Darwin's survival of the fittest theories may also be relevant to teh interwebz.


Well, when dealing with any kind of butt-fucking, it's always about fit.
Gravdigr • Oct 30, 2009 10:58 am
It wasn't dead when I started...


Griff;601816 wrote:
You guys are new here.

I'm concerned about the ethical implications. How can a dead dog give consent?


More importantly, how can he refuse?
TheMercenary • Oct 30, 2009 3:25 pm
Well she was breathing when I picked her up in the bar last night. And she really didn't look that doggeredly until the morning.
Flint • Oct 30, 2009 4:27 pm
TheMercenary;604595 wrote:
Well she was breathing when I picked her up in the bar last night. And she really didn't look that doggeredly until the morning.

I used to play in a blues/rock band that had a song called "Went home at 2 with a 10, Woke up at 10 with a 2"