Gov Sanford and Naked Hiking Day
Wow, suddenly we have an interesting Republican and he's in a different state. If this guy really did ditch work to go hiking during the solstice on Naked Hiking Day, then he might be just what the party of stuck up ***holes needs to lighten up.
From
here
COLUMBIA, S.C. (AP) — After a political mystery — "Where in the World is South Carolina's Governor?" — Mark Sanford's aides said he was stunned by all the fuss over his five-day absence and would cut short a secretive hike along the Appalachian Trail.
State officials and even his wife said they had no idea where he went over Father's Day weekend, and not everyone is buying his explanation. His disappearance has left some in the Palmetto State wondering: Is this any way for a governor to act?
Sanford's spokesman said the governor was hiking to clear his head after the legislative session, during which he lost a key battle.
But critics of the two-term Republican — and there are many — wondered why it took nine hours after reporters started asking questions for the governor's staff to say what the state's chief executive was doing. Sanford was expected back in his office Wednesday, but his aides stopped answering questions about his trip, including where he was on the 2,175-mile trail, whether he was with security and if anyone else could confirm his whereabouts.
Did it have anything to do with
Naked Hiking Day?
The story started to resemble a John Grisham novel. A southern conservative governor and very vocal critic of a popular liberal president eluded his security detail and completely disappeared with his last known whereabouts — before he (or someone) turned off his cell phones — somewhere outside of Atlanta.
Staff was silent. Some were talking about succession plans. The First Lady though said she wasn’t concerned. “He was writing something and wanted some space to get away from the kids,” she said.
But many wondered aloud how this traditional, family-loving, Republican governor of a southern state could miss Fathers Day. After all he’s got four children! Was something sinister in the air?
Then it took a Farrelly brothers screenplay type of twist. Sanford had not disappeared. According to his spokesman, he was hiking on the Appalachian Trail. Coincidentally, on Naked Hiking Day.
It’s a big tradition. Many hikers celebrate the summer solstice by hiking au naturel. It just so happened the solstice occurred on Fathers Day — one of the days Sanford was hiking.
:D and :eek: I can't imagine running into him NEKKID!
Heh, I just got finished
WTFing this, and it was on the top of the queue.
Well, it was Father's Day, so as a father he could do what he wanted.
It's not like he was Eliot Spitzer and spent the night before Valentine's Day with a hooker.
Yeh really - where was Hillary at the time?
Welllll..... either
(a) he was hiking, nude. Cool, but a tad unRepublican.
(b) he was hiking, clad, ignorant of the custom &/or having a perv.
(c) he was not hiking, but ........ [insert dubious activity here] .... instead.
If he was hiking nude on midsummer's day ... there should be a nice even all-over tan to prove it. Not that I am volunteering to check, mind you.
If he wants to go hiking, that's fine. Great, even. Hiking is an activity more people should do so they gain an appreciation for the little bit of nature left in the country.
But if you are in an important position, you should always be reachable. A governor has responsibilities and shouldn't be going AWOL for several days on end. His staff should be able to reach him in an emergency at all times.
Uh and what about his wife and/or children?
This is really odd behavior. Going ion a hike of this magnitude requires some planning and preparation, not to mention all the equipment necessary to spend days out there. Oh and did he go alone? Has he done this type of hiking before? Where exactly did he go? Where is all his stuff from the hike?
There are way too many questions that remain unanswered.
Uh and what about his wife and/or children?
I think the public has no right to tell the governor what he should do with his family. The public does have the right to demand that he be accessible in case there's an emergency. He could carry a cell phone that only a trusted aide can call. He'd still get some R&R and the public would have a governor available.
I was not implying that we did. But if I was his family, I certainly would.
Seriously, you wouldn't be a little upset if your wife disappeared for 4-5 days? That isn't normal.
Those of us who don't live in Mayberry shouldn't be so concerned about the Gov's whereabouts. Might just be out fishin' with Andy Barney and Floyd.
UPDATE:
Gov. Mark Sanford did not spend the last five days hiking the Appalachian Trail — as his staff had indicated — but was instead in Buenos Aires, Argentina, the South Carolina Republican told The State newspaper Wednesday.
Spotted returning from the trip in the Atlanta airport Wednesday morning, Sanford said he had considered hiking the Appalachian Trail after his state's busy legislative season came to end but instead decided on a more "exotic" trip.
"I wanted to do something exotic. It's a great city," said Sanford of his five-day getaway that appeared to leave his entire staff and family in the dark about his whereabouts. Sanford also said no one else accompanied him on the trip.
Sanford wouldn't tell the newspaper exactly what he did in the South American country, besides take a drive along the coastline.
The South Carolina governor also said he hadn't planned to return until Thursday, but came back earlier after his chief of staff contacted him to say the story of his whereabouts was drawing widespread media attention.
Sanford expressed surprise the story was attracting such attention, saying it's not unusual for him to take such trips.
"I would get out of the bubble I am in," he said.
In a short interview with CNN Tuesday, Sanford's wife Jenny said she still has not talked to her husband since he left last Thursday and did not know where he went.
But if you are in an important position, you should always be reachable. A governor has responsibilities and shouldn't be going AWOL for several days on end. His staff should be able to reach him in an emergency at all times.
He was just putting into practice the repubican philosophy of "less government". :rolleyes:
Gov. Mark Sanford did not spend the last five days hiking the Appalachian Trail — as his staff had indicated — but was instead in Buenos Aires, Argentina, the South Carolina Republican told The State newspaper Wednesday.
Mark Foley and
Larry Craig told the governor that you can purchase a young boy for less than $100.00 in Buenos Aires. :p
If he wants to go hiking, that's fine. Great, even. Hiking is an activity more people should do so they gain an appreciation for the little bit of nature left in the country.
But if you are in an important position, you should always be reachable. A governor has responsibilities and shouldn't be going AWOL for several days on end. His staff should be able to reach him in an emergency at all times.
This really is the bottom line.
you can purchase a young boy for less than $100.00 in Buenos Aires. :p
You outta know.
UPDATE:
Sanford admits affair
South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford, his eyes red, admitted to having an extramarital affair Wednesday with an Argentine woman.
"I've been unfaithful to be my wife," Sanford said at a state capitol news conference.
It began very innocently," he explained, saying that developed into an adulterous relationship in the past year.
He said he seen his unidentified mistress three times since they began the affair or, as he put it, "since the whole sparking thing."
Sanford said he was resigning his post as Chairman of the Republican Governor's Association.
Taking questions from reporters, Sanford said his wife knew about the relationship before his trip last week and that "they had been working through this thing for about the last five months."
He shed tears as he explained how helpful one friend had been.
He also choked up when he said: "This has been selfishness on my part."
Sanford's admission caps an extraordinary week in which he was revealed to having been in Argentina and not, as his staff said, hiking on the Appalachian trail.
Before disclosing his relationship, Sanford apologized profusely to a number of family and friends.
"I've let down a lot of people -- that's the bottom line," Sanford said.
In what were at times rambling remarks, Sanford delved into the nature of sin and explained his affinity for "adventure trips."
He requested a "zone of privacy" for his family.
Now he needs to resign and go away.
Seems to be a lot of Republicans lately doing this extra-marital shit.
I think it's now been established that the more "pro-family" you are, the more likely it is that you are a closet freak.
Wow - I never noticed that before. Thats really pathetic. Do they correct their mistake eventually? Like after 4-5 hours?
Does it really matter? The people who watch Faux are so old they prolly can't read that part anyway.
Do they do that during every scandal?!
Apparently they did fix it eventually.
geez, we're awash in idiots. who think with their dicks. bah!
another one bites the proverbial dust over some pussy.
asshole.
Argentina huh? I guess even mistresses are being outsourced these days.
Right on Gov! Those Argentiana women are HOT!
Well, maybe he was nude hiking in Argentina.
Sounds cool. Do they have bugs there?
Seems to be a lot of Republicans lately doing this extra-marital shit.
I think it's now been established that the more "pro-family" you are, the more likely it is that you are a closet freak.
Not necessarily. The big difference is that Republicans have forced themselves into a close alliance with their fringe wing, which is fundie religionists. This magnifies a human foible into an act of hypocrisy.
If the Dems were to cater to their fringe wing, and a Dem politician got outed as a 'closet freak', the only response would be 'what took you so long?'.;)
BTW, my web research found that there was one openly gay Republican in Congress who actually served 10 years after coming out. There haven't been any since then.
Not necessarily. The big difference is that Republicans have forced themselves into a close alliance with their fringe wing, which is fundie religionists. This magnifies a human foible into an act of hypocrisy.
Come on, that is silly.
So I can assume that Demoncrats have forced themselves into a close alliance with the fringe Leftists? Huffington and Soro's? And a obvious socialist agenda? Sure seems that way.
Right on Gov! Those Argentiana women are HOT!
For his sake I hope she's a hot Argentinian lady, but I'm expecting a heavily spackled white girl from Operation Rescue.
Did anyone see his four boys?
I felt so bad for them.
No, but they're in a horrible position. Mom will be organizing for the big divorce payout, which will make Dad out to be a pretty small person in the press no matter what the full story is. According to the Times, Sanford isn't one of the over the top GOP moralizers so that line of abuse from the left could be misplaced.
I hope she rakes him over the coals. And I hope his new gf has lots of money.
Where are the pictures of the other woman? It's taking too long for them to show up in the media. All these cutbacks in the press are harshing my buzz.
I see they
know her name, and that she's supposedly hot, but I want pictures already.
Me too. In a bikini at some South American beach. In a thong.
Yeah, see? He was just being a guy. :right:
Where are the pictures of the other woman? It's taking too long for them to show up in the media. All these cutbacks in the press are harshing my buzz.
I see they know her name, and that she's supposedly hot, but I want pictures already.
Outrage, I'm feeling it!
OMG.
Granted, the wife is probably some gold-digging shrew, or was in her day, who likes prestige. Really no different than Pussy McKnockers. She dead-fished out on him and he needed ejaculation, needed it bad, and not just from the hand that kneads him.
So, get out of your marriage. Then you can fuck others without hurting your kids. Oh, can't? You're in public office and it wouldn't look good? Too fucking bad. Then keep your dick in your pants and suck it up, pasty boy.
you know, now that the cat is out of the bag, these two lovebirds are FREE to explore their magnificent love with no another, unfettered by his family or career coz both are over! He should be happy - now he gets to be with her ALL THE TIME!
He should be packing his bags and heading south for this fine woman. They are, clearly, madly in love with each other.
Being with the Beloved is only good when you can't be. Once he finds out she farts in bed and she sees spinach in his teeth - it's over.
But but but we want to see her naked. We want to see her naked. We want...
*screeeeeeeech* sorry, my record had a scratch.
Yeah, it's gross.
Come on, you know you want to see what she looks like. ;)
It's almost a foregone conclusion that she's very attractive. Yeah? So? Her and 9 million other women. ;)
Its whats on the inside that counts. This guy is an idiot!
Haggis! He's an idiot on the inside!
Republican?

That was Faux News, so the (D) was *not* a mistake. It's their little way of spinning the feeble minded electorate. Really. I'm dead serious.
Hasn't that happened before, or something similar?
You know, I could care less who this guy fucks. However, if you make a huge deal out of Family Values and Christian Morality, then you've sort of already caught your dick in the zipper when you start using your little head to determine your course of action.
Here's the difference between Him and Me:
He gets caught committing adultery. He confesses, and is forgiven, because he's a Christian.
I get caught committing adultery. After we all have a good laugh, I am condemned to burn in Hell by the Christians, including Him, 'cause I'm not a Christian.
See how easy that is? Do whatever the fuck you want, say you're sorry and ask Jeebus to forgive you, and you're good.
I don't think you'll burn in hell Els. ;)
Looks like a liberal photoshop trick by me Splode. Something to stir the shit. You don't think for one minute that pic is real? Do you?
OMG.
Granted, the wife is probably some gold-digging shrew,.
Actually, it wasn't the wife who was doing the digging.
Mr. Sanford, 49 years old, said he still hopes to reconcile with his wife, Jennifer Sullivan Sanford, 46, formerly a vice president at investment bank Lazard Freres & Co., and an heiress to the family that built the Skil Power Tools brand, now a subsidiary of Robert Bosch GmbH.
BTW, have you read some of his love notes? Wow! The guy had too much soul to be a Republican.
The e-mails from July 2008 reveal two enamored lovers, but also show Sanford's concern. "How in the world this lightening (sic) strike snuck up on us I am still not quite sure. As I have said to you before I certainly had a special feeling about you from the first time we met, but these feelings were contained and I genuinely enjoyed our special friendship and the comparing of all too many personal notes," Sanford wrote.
He continued, "I feel a little vulnerable because this is ground I have never certainly never covered before -- so if you have pearls of wisdom on how we figure all this out please let me know...In the meantime please sleep soundly knowing that despite the best efforts of my head my heart cries out for you, your voice, your body, the touch of your lips, the touch of your finger tips and an even deeper connection to your soul."
The woman, who The State identifies as simply "Maria," reciprocated Sanford's feelings. "You are my love ... something hard to believe even for myself as it's also a kind of impossible love, not only because of distance but situation. Sometimes you don't choose things, they just happen... I can't redirect my feelings and I am very happy with mine towards you."
I kept on thinking of that song from West Side Story. "Maria, I just met a girl named Maria......"
I do.
Interesting. But it was 12 years ago. And I certainly would not put it past a liberal site like Huffington or one of the others that floated falsehoods about Palin's family to do the same. And that was much more recently.
Actually all the Fox News hate is really pretty comical.
So it is still quite possible that it is a complete fake.
It took them 5 appeals to get that ruling, I don't think they changed their mind about how things should be anytime soon after. Give me a link to something that indicates otherwise.
Maybe these are fake too, I don't know...
1,
2,
3I have no idea. But now I just think they are pretty funny.
Media Matters is nothing more than the other side of the coin.
Media Matters
1625 Massachusetts Ave. NW
Suite 300
Washington, DC
20036
Phone :202-756-4100
URL: Website
Self-described "progressive" media "monitor" which tracks content that "forwards a conservative agenda."
Creation of Democratic Party funders and operatives and former conservative writer David Brock
Established in May 2004, Media Matters for America is a "web-based, not-for-profit … progressive research and information center" seeking to "systematically monitor a cross-section of print, broadcast, cable, radio, and Internet media outlets for conservative misinformation." But in addition to "news or commentary that is not accurate, reliable, or credible," the organization's concept of "misinformation" includes anything that "forwards the conservative agenda." Thus political differences of opinion are often portrayed by Media Matters as lies or worse.
Media Matters' founder and CEO is David Brock. A reporter for the conservative magazine The American Spectator in the 1990s, Brock (in the aftermath of his biography of Hillary Clinton that brought disastrous reviews) engaged in a public self-denunciation, characterizing all his past writings critical of liberal figures as a confection of lies and slanders. In Brock's present judgment, the mainstream media have fallen under the sway of conservative ideology. He believes that conservatives have moved the mainstream media "to the right and therefore they've moved American politics to the right. … I wanted to create an institution [Media Matters] to combat what they're doing."
Standing behind Brock was John Podesta, a former chief of staff in the Clinton administration and the head of the "progressive" Washington, DC think tank, the Center for American Progress. In 2004 Podesta provided Brock with office space for his fledgling enterprise. Soon after, Media Matters received over $2 million in seed donations from a roster of affluent donors including Leo Hindery Jr., a former cable magnate; Susie Tompkins Buell, a co-founder of the fashion company Esprit and a close ally of Senator Hillary Clinton; James Hormel, a San Francisco philanthropist who nearly served as ambassador to Luxembourg during the Clinton administration; Bren Simon, a Democratic activist and the wife of shopping-mall developer Mel Simon; and New York psychologist and philanthropist Gail Furman. Media Matters, which can accept tax-deductible contributions under section 501(c)(3) of the tax code, has also benefited from the patronage of Peter Lewis, chairman of Progressive Corporation and a longtime consort of leftist financier George Soros.
Media Matters has not always been forthcoming about its high-profile backers. In particular, the group has long labored to obscure any financial ties to George Soros. But in March 2003, the Cybercast News Service (CNS) detailed the copious links between Media Matters and several Soros "affiliates"—among them MoveOn.org, the Center for American Progress, and Peter Lewis. Confronted with this story, a spokesman for the organization explained that "Media Matters for America has never received funding directly from George Soros" (emphasis added), a transparent evasion.
Nor were groups cited by CNS the only connection between Media Matters and Soros. As investigative journalist Byron York has noted, another Soros affiliate that bankrolled Media Matters was the New Democratic Network. In addition, Soros is reported to be involved in the newly formed Democracy Alliance, a partnership of some 80 affluent financiers who each have vowed to contribute $1 million or more in order to build up an ideological infrastructure of leftist thinks tanks and advocacy groups. News reports list Media Matters as a main beneficiary of the Alliance's funding. By August of 2004, Media Matters' operating budget had already doubled to $4 million.
To summarize, Soros and his Open Society Institute pour millions of dollars into the coffers of MoveOn, the Center for American Progress, and Democracy Alliance. In turn, these organizations funnel some of that money to Media Matters.
Prior to founding Media Matters, David Brock met with a number of leading Democratic Party figures, including Senator Hillary Clinton, former Senator Tom Daschle of South Dakota, and former Vice President Al Gore. Today, more than a few of the organization's roughly 30 staff members are Democratic operatives. Among these are Media Matters' chief communications strategist Dennis Yedwab, who is also the Director of Strategic Resources at Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. Brock's personal assistant, Mandy Vlasz, is a Democratic pollster and a veteran consultant to Democratic campaigns, including the 2000 Gore/Lieberman campaign. Katie Barge, the Director of Research at Media Matters, formerly presided over opposition research for Senator John Edwards' unsuccessful 2004 presidential campaign.
In 2004 Media Matters reported that its website had elicited some 150,000 comments in its discussion forums and that over 22,000 subscribers had registered to receive its e-mail alerts. Brock has also become a regular feature on leftist radio stations like Air America.
A notable figure at Media Matters is senior fellow Eric Boehlert, who was among the most passionate defenders of University of South Florida professor Sami Al-Arian after the latter was accused of having been the North American leader of the terrorist organization Palestinian Islamic Jihad. In an article titled "The Prime-time Smearing of Sami Al-Arian," Boehlert charged that: "In the wake of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, all four media giants, eagerly tapping into the country's mood of vengeance and fear, latched onto the Al-Arian story, fudging the facts and ignoring the most rudimentary tenets of journalism in their haste to better tell a sinister story about lurking Middle Eastern dangers here at home."
Media Matters' Senior Advisor Jamison Foser wrote on May 26, 2006: "The defining issue of our time is the media. ... The dominant political force of our time is the media. Time after time, the news media have covered progressives and conservatives in wildly different ways -- and, time after time, they do so to the benefit of conservatives."
Media Matters' Editorial Director is Marcia B. Kuntz, who formerly headed the Judicial Selection Project of Alliance for Justice.
In September 2006, Media Matters became the sponsor of Eric Alterman's media, politics, and culture blog, Altercation.
In June 2007, Media Matters released a report titled The Progressive Majority: Why A Conservative America Is a Myth. According to this study, the "conventional wisdom" which "says that the American public is fundamentally conservative," is "fundamentally false." "Americans are progressive across a wide range of controversial issues, and they're growing more progressive all the time," the researchers conclude. The report examines public attitudes regarding the economy, social issues, national security, the environment, energy, health care, and the proper role of government.
On January 14, 2008, the Canada Free Press identified the Treasurer of Media Matters, Rachel Pritzker Hunter, as a Board member of Democracy Alliance (which helps to fund Media Matters). A generous donor to Democratic candidates and causes, Hunter in recent years has given money to the presidential campaigns of Sherrod Brown, John Kerry, Howard Dean, and Wesley Clark.
Media Matters (which in 2005 pulled in contributions, gifts and grants totaling approximately $8.5 million) receives financial support from the Tides Foundation, the Arca Foundation, the Peninsula Community Foundation, and the San Francisco Foundation.
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=7150When the Foley scandal broke, I actually saw the Fox report with Foley listed as a 'D', so I know that at least one is not faked.
I don't know if it's fraud or incompetence, but it hardly matters which.
Either way it discredits the station.
Either way it discredits the station.
No less than MM is discredited by it's ownership and connections to the radical left.
Republicans love false equivalency.
Well I am not a Republickin but I fail to how you can draw the conclusion that it is a "false" equivalency. There is nothing false about it. You have two sources of information. Both of which are representing the extremes of the political continuum.
This thread took a turn for the boring, and made me forget the important business of pictures of the "other woman."
Here she is!!!!!!Gawker says no, that those were early Facebook pictures from the wrong person. They have this
a grainy screencap from a video on their page.
Oh my freakin' God, you two.
No less than MM is discredited by it's ownership and connections to the radical left.
MM has not been discredited by anything you've posted. Clearly a bias exists there, similar to Rupert Murdock's ownership of FOX, but you've not shown evidence of a lack of integrity equal to that of FOX.
HA HA HA HA - What an ass. Thats precious!
Rush says it's Obamas fault. :rolleyes:
Is that for real? Someone who expects the public to take them seriously blathering nonsense like that? Really?
For some, Rush is the word of god. If he says it, it is so.
I think most people find him to be an ass of the highest order. Hanity is his wanta-be..
MM has not been discredited by anything you've posted. Clearly a bias exists there,
Everything they report is suspect.
They usually just "report" direct quotes. They put their analysis at the top, and the complete context at the bottom. Sometimes, the only bit that is theirs is the headline.
Often, when a Limbaugh quote (for example) is brought up, people claim it was taken out of context. So MM includes the context. So people attack their funding. As if MM's funding somehow made Limbaugh say something stupid. Or FOX misidentify a scandal-plagued Republican as a Democrat.
Maybe we should have an "Idiot of the Day" thread. In any case, Sanford's wife certainly qualifies:
http://thediscust.com/?p=547
"South Carolina first lady Jenny Sanford released another statement today, this time blaming her husband’s affair on the declining moral values in America.
“Of course I’m not saying that Mark is gay,” Sanford said, “but he may as well be. The moral decay in this country has claimed another victim and this time it was my family. Our marriage was perfect until these laws started passing around the country. Clearly the slow dissolution of the sanctity of marriage in America seeped into Mark’s psyche until he no longer felt compelled to abide by our vows.”
Social conservatives were quick to show their support for the first lady’s statement.
“It’s finally happened,” said Rush Limbaugh, conservative radio personality. “America, I’ve been warning you for years that gay marriage would destroy the American family and look… there they are, a husband, wife, and four children — destroyed. When is this going to stop America? When will the liberals be satisfied? When all the marriages break up? This wasn’t Mark Sanford’s fault, this was Ted Kennedy’s fault. Sanford didn’t cheapen the value of marriage, he was victimized by the cheapening of marriage.”"
Just think! A perfect marriage until those nasty gays wanted their rights! Wow! Most marriages are not nearly that perfect!
Just testing you. Pretty quick, H. M.
The parody does ring true, however.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that we the undersigned elected officials of the people of Oklahoma, religious leaders and citizens of the State of Oklahoma, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world, solemnly declare that the HOPE of the great State of Oklahoma and of these United States, rests upon the Principles of Religion and Morality as put forth in the HOLY BIBLE.
Just testing you.
Don't be a troll.
CHARLESTON, S.C. (AP) - South Carolina's first lady, a former Wall Street vice president who helped launch her husband's political career, filed for divorce Friday more than five months after his tearful public confession of an affair with an Argentine woman.
The governor blamed himself and said he and Jenny will "work earnestly to be the best mom and dad we can be to four of the finest boys on earth.
"While it is not the course I would have hoped for, or would choose, I want to take full responsibility for the moral failure that led us to this tragic point," he said in a statement.
Jenny Sanford's announcement came after a week of wrenching twists, including a legislative panel's decision Wednesday to turn aside an impeachment push in favor of a formal rebuke for the governor's conduct.
"Certainly his actions hurt me, and they caused consequences for me, but they don't in any way take away my own self-esteem. They reflect poorly on him."
"The defendant has engaged in a sexual relationship with a woman other than plaintiff," the complaint reads. "Plaintiff has not condoned that relationship and is informed and believes that she is entitled to a divorce ... from the defendant on the grounds of adultery."
Link
Damn we were that >< close to getting rid of this scumbag.