Do you edit Wikipedia much?

Flint • Mar 26, 2009 12:33 pm
I created an account on Wikipedia for the sole purpose of making the following edit. Can you spot the difference?
glatt • Mar 26, 2009 12:39 pm
Yes. The comma after "consensus" in the first line of the example.

They are fortunate to have you contributing to the cause.
Flint • Mar 26, 2009 12:51 pm
The sentence doesn't make any sense without that comma!

Actually, it changes the meaning to something that doesn't make any sense within the paragraph.
Cicero • Mar 26, 2009 2:57 pm
How about a semi-colon?
Flint • Mar 26, 2009 3:04 pm
Of course, I did seriously consider using a semi-colon; but I opted not to go hog wild on my first-ever Wikipedia edit.

[SIZE="1"][COLOR="Gray"]If you want to change it to a semi-colon, I promise not to start an editing war with you.[/COLOR][/SIZE]
dar512 • Mar 26, 2009 3:06 pm
You're a funny man, Flint.
DanaC • Mar 26, 2009 3:06 pm
Is there a delay on the edit, or does it change straight away? I've never edited a wikipedia page.

I've written a page for my university wiki (Leeds Wiki). Was quite interesting having to present information in that format. You have to organise your thoughts differently.

https://wiki.leeds.ac.uk/index.php/HIST2530_Building_the_literate_nation:_the_historical_debate
Cicero • Mar 26, 2009 3:11 pm
You can also put the comma after the word "up".

Flint, why won't you do anything the way I would do it? :)
Flint • Mar 26, 2009 3:17 pm
dar512;549653 wrote:
You're a funny man, Flint.
Aw, heck. You know what they say about funny guys...
that they're just masking the bone-crushing angst that they struggle with for every agonizing second of their tortuous, self doubt-riddled existence*.

Ah... yes Dana, the edit took place immediately, however this may be because I specified that it was a "minor" edit.


[SIZE="1"][COLOR="Gray"]
*they say the same thing about guys who create an account on Wikipedia to add a single comma[/COLOR][/SIZE]
Cicero • Mar 26, 2009 3:19 pm
Edit this Flint! lol

You know what they say about funny guys... that they're just masking the bone-crushing angst that they struggle with for every agonizing second of their tortuous, self doubt-riddled existence.
Undertoad • Mar 26, 2009 3:50 pm
I've edited about 10 pages. Changes always show up immediately.
Flint • Mar 26, 2009 4:08 pm
Well, sure. That's because you're Undertoad.
sweetwater • Mar 26, 2009 4:12 pm
Shouldn't it be called Wikipedit instead of Wikipedia? :) I've never edited anything there, but I'm happy to say I know someone who does.
Shawnee123 • Mar 26, 2009 4:14 pm
What happens if you edit and it's all just a bunch of BS you made up? Does someone get to gong you or something?
Flint • Mar 26, 2009 4:23 pm
Shawnee123;549690 wrote:
What happens if you edit and it's all just a bunch of BS you made up?
The whole world is watching, and it gets corrected almost immediately:
Flint;287375 wrote:
In this article: deliberate (and subtle) deceptions were corrected within three hours.
Clodfobble • Mar 26, 2009 4:24 pm
Cicero wrote:
How about a semi-colon?


Flint wrote:
Of course, I did seriously consider using a semi-colon; but I opted not to go hog wild on my first-ever Wikipedia edit.


Ahem... a semicolon would be incorrect in that usage. Both halves would need to be a complete sentence, and you can't begin a sentence with "Only to..." unless you made that whole clause the subject of an additional verb. Just for the record.
Flint • Mar 26, 2009 4:41 pm
What's this? I rescind my earlier statement about the editing war.
Cicero • Mar 26, 2009 4:45 pm
LOL! That is totally true. ahem.........

http://owl.english.purdue.edu/handouts/grammar/g_commacomp.html

I did have a labotomy since my editing days........I think they are over! lol!
classicman • Mar 26, 2009 6:08 pm
Wiki seems to have some "moderators" who overlord err oversee some of that. There is another thread somewhere where a persons political affiliation kept getting deleted/added/deleted....
TheMercenary • Mar 27, 2009 9:30 am
Someone needs to have better control of some of the more controversial stuff. If it is known to be factual, as in the case with UT indication that a certain political person was an elected democrat, then it should be left alone and not deleted. A real problem with Wiki as a source for subjects which are known to be controversial. I am more comfortable using it for less controversial subjects.
xoxoxoBruce • Mar 28, 2009 3:04 pm
Good place to get a bunch of links though.
toranokaze • Mar 30, 2009 8:44 am
Shouldn't the word thus be off set with two common, since it is a conjunctive adverb?
limey • Apr 2, 2009 6:10 pm
I tried to edit the other day but my IP is banned. I can't be bothered to get myself unbanned from "collateral damage" so the world will never know what I had to say ...
Elspode • Apr 2, 2009 6:54 pm
I've done a little bit of editing. Fleshed out an article about Raytown once, added some info on one of the Rainmakers, also added some info about the brother of Max Weinberg 7 member Mark Pender, and I've done some little bits of adding literacy here and there.
Torrere • Apr 3, 2009 7:53 pm
One time I was studying for a final exam, and checked the Wikipedia article for the Aral Sea to make sure that I had gotten the right ideas out of the material.

I saw a [citation needed] marker, and realized that I had just seen that quote in one of my readings, so I found it and added the citation.

I think it's still the contribution that I'm most proud of.