Dear Undertoad:

TGRR • Mar 10, 2009 9:04 pm
Please change the name of the political forum from "Politics" to "Richard Nixon's Festering Corpse".

Thanks in advance.

TGRR,
Would like to point out that he DID say "please".
fomentor • Mar 10, 2009 9:23 pm
"Richard Nixon's Festering Corpse" is a suitable place to dump most political opinions, i will vote for this change.
Beestie • Mar 10, 2009 9:56 pm
Speaking of festering corpses, I avoid that forum like it is one.
TGRR • Mar 10, 2009 10:03 pm
Beestie;543850 wrote:
Speaking of festering corpses, I avoid that forum like it is one.


Stop hating America.
Beestie • Mar 10, 2009 10:15 pm
I don't hate America! I love America!

Now some of the people in it... that's a whole 'nuther kettle of fish.

I went on a field trip with my daughter today. We went to the home of George Mason. George Washington and Thomas Jefferson were frequent long-term guests there. It was really cool walking the same floors and walking into the same rooms as Washington and Jefferson.

What do you think they would think of some of the drivel that masquerades as political debate these days? Not much, I bet.
Pico and ME • Mar 10, 2009 10:17 pm
They would probably recognize it. Human nature was the same then as it is now.
Beestie • Mar 10, 2009 10:21 pm
Pico and ME;543858 wrote:
They would probably recognize it. Human nature was the same then as it is now.
Not really. It was deeply rooted in the philosophy of the Enlightenment.

But on second thought, Enlightenment does rhyme with Entitlement.
TGRR • Mar 10, 2009 10:32 pm
Beestie;543857 wrote:
I don't hate America! I love America!

Now some of the people in it... that's a whole 'nuther kettle of fish.

I went on a field trip with my daughter today. We went to the home of George Mason. George Washington and Thomas Jefferson were frequent long-term guests there. It was really cool walking the same floors and walking into the same rooms as Washington and Jefferson.

What do you think they would think of some of the drivel that masquerades as political debate these days? Not much, I bet.


You'd be amazed, in Jefferson's case. He was a political animal of the first water.

Washington, on the other hand, was just an animal...and the best pit fighter of his day, with the possible exception of Ben "Crusher" Franklin...and he'd kill a punk for talking politics while he was dropping the mac hammer on some honey showing a little ankle.
lumberjim • Mar 10, 2009 10:39 pm
politics in the days of George, Ben and Thomas :: cutting down your own trees and building a stout log cabin.

politics today :: standing in line at the dmv
TGRR • Mar 10, 2009 10:41 pm
lumberjim;543867 wrote:
politics in the days of George, Ben and Thomas :: cutting down your own trees and building a stout log cabin.

politics today :: standing in line at the dmv


Actually, the United States was mired in paperwork and corruption before the ink was dry on the constitution.

Just saying.
Undertoad • Mar 10, 2009 10:43 pm
If you don't like it, just wait! In six months the forum will be different.
TGRR • Mar 10, 2009 10:54 pm
Undertoad;543871 wrote:
If you don't like it, just wait! In six months the forum will be different.


I like it. However, I feel we should rename the political board in honor of the man who made today possible.
TheMercenary • Mar 10, 2009 11:05 pm
Beestie;543862 wrote:
Not really. It was deeply rooted in the philosophy of the Enlightenment.

But on second thought, Enlightenment does rhyme with Entitlement.


:lol2: Dude has a point. :D
Tiki • Mar 11, 2009 1:04 am
I absolutely support a name change to "Richard Nixon's Festering Corpse"!
Kaliayev • Mar 11, 2009 5:08 am
Its got my vote.

Question: how many votes do all my alt accounts get? Do I have to break out the proxy?
DanaC • Mar 11, 2009 11:51 am
Votes? We don't need votes. They just complicated things. We have a benign dictator.
where are the fnords • Mar 11, 2009 11:51 am
George Washington, UH dont you mean Adam Weishaupt?
Aliantha • Mar 11, 2009 6:21 pm
DanaC;544052 wrote:
Votes? We don't need votes. They just complicated things. We have a benign dictator.


You should be careful making statements like that Dana. I once got banned from a site for saying something almost exactly the same.

It went something like this:

Poster: I think we should all have a say about how things are run.

Me: This is a dictatorship, not a democracy. (smilie)

Apparently it really was a dictatorship. lol
DanaC • Mar 11, 2009 6:50 pm
lol

*looks around with worried expression*




Oh, btw, I just spotted the typo in my last post. It was supposed to say complicate, not complicated
Aliantha • Mar 11, 2009 6:51 pm
I don't think you need to worry Dana. ;)

You're pretty 'popular'. lol
ZenGum • Mar 11, 2009 7:48 pm
Flanders/Devil/Lawer: I give you the Jury of the Damned ... Richard Nixon

Nixon: But I'm not dead yet!

F/D/L: Shut up. You owe me.
classicman • Mar 11, 2009 8:37 pm
Votes? We don't need votes. They just complicate things. We have a benign dictator.

There, if she goes so do I.
monster • Mar 11, 2009 9:25 pm
Aliantha;544160 wrote:
I don't think you need to worry Dana. ;)

You're pretty 'popular'. lol


:dedhorse:
TGRR • Mar 11, 2009 10:06 pm
Aliantha;544160 wrote:
I don't think you need to worry Dana. ;)

You're pretty 'popular'. lol


wut
TheMercenary • Mar 11, 2009 10:08 pm
Aliantha;544160 wrote:
I don't think you need to worry Dana. ;)

You're pretty 'popular'. lol

yep. Just like HS.
Aliantha • Mar 12, 2009 12:26 am
What dead horse am I flogging.

I was making a joke and it obviously wasn't what you lot thought.

I'll explain.

Among my circle of friends, if a chick is refered to as 'popular' it usually means she's easy. Of course, we know this is not the case with Dana - hence the quote marks - but I got a laugh out of it for myself. It's not said in a hurtful way and isn't meant to be insulting in any way. In fact, it just became a joke when we used to go to the pub and some bloke would buy one of us a drink. We'd usually turn around and say something like, "well aren't you popular" with an understood emphasis on the popular.

Anyway, it's always lovely to have to explain humour. Hope you've all gotten something out of it today.
DucksNuts • Mar 12, 2009 5:15 am
There's a little paranoia going around, Ali ;)
DanaC • Mar 12, 2009 6:31 am
*Chuckles* well it made me smile anyway :P
TGRR • Mar 12, 2009 10:50 am
Aliantha;544286 wrote:

Anyway, it's always lovely to have to explain humour.


Well, some people can tell a joke, and some can't.
Pie • Mar 12, 2009 11:00 am
43!

[COLOR=Wheat]/obscure?[/COLOR]
Trilby • Mar 12, 2009 11:14 am
Pie;544435 wrote:
43!

[COLOR=Wheat]/obscure?[/COLOR]


No - I'm laughing out loud as we speak!
dar512 • Mar 12, 2009 11:16 am
I'm with Bri. PPP (Practically Perfect Post)
Aliantha • Mar 12, 2009 6:09 pm
DucksNuts;544332 wrote:
There's a little paranoia going around, Ali ;)


You think? ;)

DanaC;544338 wrote:
*Chuckles* well it made me smile anyway :P


That's good. :) That was the main point.

Bugger the rest of those no humoured posters around here eh? :D
where are the fnords • Mar 13, 2009 4:14 am
i gave up thinking, it was hazardous to my health
Skunks • Mar 13, 2009 4:21 am
please add a link somewhere easily accessible in the navigation for SteveDallas's random threads. Or even re-implement it. So simple, so beautiful.

on behalf of my insomnia,
thanks.
SteveDallas • Mar 13, 2009 11:04 am
Skunks;544743 wrote:
please add a link somewhere easily accessible in the navigation for SteveDallas's random threads. Or even re-implement it. So simple, so beautiful.

on behalf of my insomnia,
thanks.

To the extent this comment reflects on my thread picker, which is truly just a little something the cat dragged in one night, thank you.

However, while I don't object to UT "officially" linking to it, I'd recommend against it.
HungLikeJesus • Mar 13, 2009 11:09 am
I hadn't thought of that, SD. Do you want me to remove it from my signature line?
HungLikeJesus • Mar 13, 2009 11:13 am
This thread shows the origin of the SDRTP.
SteveDallas • Mar 13, 2009 11:18 am
Not at all.. I was referring to an Official Cellar Link[size=1](tm)[/size]. If I didn't want anybody using it I'd get rid of it. (The load on my shared hosting plan is almost nonexistent.) My concerns are mainly in the area of not making UT look responsible for something he didn't do, in case there's a problem with it or a future vBulletin upgrade breaks it or something like that.
classicman • Mar 13, 2009 12:07 pm
Well I'd like to say that I love to roll the dice occasionally with it. Its a great way to find threads I wouldn't normally. And hey - keeping me outta the politics forum can only be good :D
lumberjim • Mar 13, 2009 12:43 pm
SteveDallas;544799 wrote:
Not at all.. I was referring to an Official Cellar Link[SIZE=1](tm)[/SIZE]. If I didn't want anybody using it I'd get rid of it. (The load on my shared hosting plan is almost nonexistent.) My concerns are mainly in the area of not making UT look responsible for something he didn't do, in case there's a problem with it or a future vBulletin upgrade breaks it or something like that.


you should contact vbulletin and see if they want to buy it
SteveDallas • Mar 13, 2009 12:58 pm
If they feel like doing it, it's trivial, and they can do a much better job since they would actually have access to the guts of vbulletin.
Cicero • Mar 13, 2009 2:45 pm
I usually think of the political forum as a good double for fish wrap. Really, put the fresh fish in it and throw it in the freezer.
Skunks • Mar 13, 2009 3:16 pm
SteveDallas;544791 wrote:
To the extent this comment reflects on my thread picker, which is truly just a little something the cat dragged in one night, thank you.

However, while I don't object to UT "officially" linking to it, I'd recommend against it.


Cats drag in great things sometimes, not all of them flapping one wing.

I specifically am lazy, and would love for there to be a 'random thread link' that I easily repeatedly click, i.e. that would be on the new random thread. Sometimes the first random thread is pretty bleh.

Guess it's a topic covered previously, but I liked the directness of a Dear UT.
HungLikeJesus • Mar 13, 2009 3:29 pm
Skunks;544899 wrote:

I specifically am lazy, and would love for there to be a 'random thread link' that I easily repeatedly click, i.e. that would be on the new random thread. Sometimes the first random thread is pretty bleh.



I don't know about Internet Explorer, but in SeaMonkey you can drag a link to the shortcut toolbar and you'll have that link available from anywhere.
lumberjim • Mar 19, 2009 10:47 am
HungLikeJesus;544902 wrote:
I don't know about Internet Explorer, but in SeaMonkey you can drag a link to the shortcut toolbar and you'll have that link available from anywhere.


NICE!

I never thought to do that. works ok for firefox too