Holding out!

RellikLaerec • Jun 25, 2008 10:53 am
Image
Little old lady held out till the end. Just amazing people can hold out even under these conditions! Kudos to the lady and everyone in support!
BigV • Jun 25, 2008 11:24 am
She's in my neighborhood... Her house is about a five minute drive from our home. It wasn't about the money--"a million dollars"--but about the fact that she *had* what she wanted, her home. And no amount of money could provide what she wanted but didn't yet have, the chance to die in the same home where her mother died. She did get that, eventually.

In a refreshing show of humanity, the project manager of the huge construction project that *dominates* her property, befriended the little old lady. He eventually cooked meals for her, checked in on her daily, drove her to the doctor. I'm gratified to learn that there are people, still, who can be civil while being on opposite sides of a given situation.

The picture above does not do justice to the claustrophobic mismatch of these two properties. I'll take some pics if anyone's interested.

I'm also relieved that this situation didn't devolve into an eminent domain/takings debacle. Not everything has a price. Or, perhaps, some prices are so dear that all parties agree they're too high.
glatt • Jun 25, 2008 11:31 am
BigV;464748 wrote:
The picture above does not do justice to the claustrophobic mismatch of these two properties. I'll take some pics if anyone's interested.

I'm also relieved that this situation didn't devolve into an eminent domain/takings debacle.


I think the mismatch is a debacle. The officials who greenlighted the commercial project like this should be ashamed of themselves. There should be setbacks from her property, and the commercial building should be stepped away from her property so that it's only one or two stories where it adjoins her propery.

This is a textbook example of how not to do development.
bigw00dy • Jun 25, 2008 12:05 pm
bigv,

I would love to see a few more pictures of you could. Maybe one that could be blown up a little. I find the story very heart-tugging!! ;-(
Clodfobble • Jun 25, 2008 3:34 pm
glatt wrote:
I think the mismatch is a debacle. The officials who greenlighted the commercial project like this should be ashamed of themselves. There should be setbacks from her property, and the commercial building should be stepped away from her property so that it's only one or two stories where it adjoins her propery.


Part of the plan (after they realized she wouldn't sell) was to wait and acquire her land after she died. There was a quote in another article from the developer, saying specifically that they had left open holes in the construction for the appropriate beams to be inserted when the land was inevitably absorbed. The project manager who befriended her may or may not have had completely altruistic intentions... but the fact remains that now she has passed on with no living relatives, and only one close friend who was there with her until the end. The will hasn't been made public, but I bet I can guess who she left the land to.
glatt • Jun 25, 2008 3:45 pm
And so they made the poor old lady endure that construction and aggravation up until she drew her last breath.

Edit: You expect a commercial developer to behave this way, but what excuse do the Seattle zoning/building officials have for their behavior? They approved this development. They approved what was done to this old lady.
spudcon • Jun 25, 2008 5:57 pm
It's only a house. If people would put less emphasis on material goods like houses, oil, television etc., this world would be a tree hugger's paradise.
lookout123 • Jun 25, 2008 5:59 pm
*looks around* is this the non-sequitor thread?
classicman • Jun 25, 2008 9:06 pm
Bless her soul - certainly one of the last of a dying breed - Those without a price...
xoxoxoBruce • Jun 25, 2008 11:42 pm
Well there goes todays IOtD. :haha:
HungLikeJesus • Jun 26, 2008 12:08 am
This makes me think of Poletown, where, in 1981, General Motors and the cities of Detroit and Hamtramck, Michigan, used eminent domain to take over 1,300 homes, plus numerous businesses and churches, evicting about 4,000 people. They then leveled the whole area and built a Cadillac plant.

The plant was supposed to employ 6,500 workers, but most of the land was turned into parking lots and the plant only employed about 3,000 workers.
Flint • Jun 26, 2008 12:13 am
xoxoxoBruce;464888 wrote:
Well there goes todays IOtD. :haha:

Funny, I just assumed this was an IOtD.
RellikLaerec • Jun 26, 2008 10:20 am
Well.. I forgot that posting in IOtD was left to anyone now and was late and tired. oops. If someone wants to move it.
Yea I would love to see more pics of this. Maybe BigV could post more in IOtD.
xoxoxoBruce • Jun 26, 2008 11:24 am
Excellent Idea, for Big V to do an IOtD with better pictures.
Flint • Jun 26, 2008 11:29 am
Hear, hear!
glatt • Jun 26, 2008 11:31 am
BigV certainly has the mad skillz to take a better picture too. And a higher rez one.
Tink • Jun 26, 2008 11:42 am
BV,

You should take one from the bridge looking down towards Leary. And also from Cash & Carry. That way you can get the size of the complex she was surrounded by.

History: It used to be a dirt parking lot for dump trucks. Ridiculous. Sshe was surrounded by trash constantly and she wouldn't budge then either. She was a sort of icon for standing up for her rights. The area was always run down. I imagine that when she moved in, the area was more woods than anything.
glatt • Jun 26, 2008 12:01 pm
Her house in "better" times.
RellikLaerec • Jun 27, 2008 12:25 am
If anyone has google earth here are the co-ordinates: 47°39'44.47"N 122°22'31.34"W. It's not as new as the picture in the articale but you really do get the scope as to how cramped it was.
BigV • Jun 27, 2008 3:33 pm
I'll try to orient you so you can better visualize the situation. The picture in the opening post was taken facing due north.

The first picture in this post is taken from across the intersection facing southwest, looking at the northeast corner of the building. I'm due north of Cash and Carry.

The second picture is taken looking to the northwest from the middle of the block. It is the first place you can "see" the lady's property.
BigV • Jun 27, 2008 3:37 pm
Approaching her house...

And we can finally see the actual structure.
BigV • Jun 27, 2008 3:49 pm
It's really cramped here...
Clodfobble • Jun 27, 2008 3:51 pm
Well, I bet her electricity costs went down, with all that insulation and shade around her house...
BigV • Jun 27, 2008 3:54 pm
The west side of the property line, looking north. I think the white plywood wall on the right is on her property--a shield to protect from flying construction debris.

The second picture is looking upward at the eastern edge of her roof.
BigV • Jun 27, 2008 4:02 pm
Still south of her house, now looking northeast. The new building just swallows hers up.
BigV • Jun 27, 2008 4:07 pm
Mike's Chili Parlor still stands on the northwest corner of the block. It's a dive.

A small memorial posted on her fence.
glatt • Jun 27, 2008 4:12 pm
Excellent pictures BigV! Much better coverage than the original.

BigV;465330 wrote:
I think the white plywood wall on the right is on her property--a shield to protect from flying construction debris.


It predates the construction. But it's clearly a shield of some sort (see post 18.)
BigV • Jun 27, 2008 4:17 pm
You're probably right. I think it's her "fence". An opaque light colored "fence". A wall, really, to separate her property from the wasteland around her. I remember that lot before the new building was erected. The picture in post #18 is about on target. What a dump.
dar512 • Jun 27, 2008 4:19 pm
Nice pictures V.

What's going in that building?
HungLikeJesus • Jun 27, 2008 4:25 pm
Is that what people mean when they talk about a gated community?
Flint • Jun 27, 2008 4:26 pm
dar512;465341 wrote:

What's going in that building?

I think it's one of those mega-churches.
glatt • Jun 27, 2008 4:41 pm
dar512;465341 wrote:
What's going in that building?


Ballard Blocks

Brokers: Maria Royer

This exciting new 136,000-square-foot, mixed-use development of an entire city block in the Ballard neighborhood of Seattle will open in 2008. Anchored by Trader Joe’s and LA Fitness Health Club, it also offers an additional 50,000 square feet of retail space and 458 parking stalls. Ballard Blocks offers the irresistible combination of suburban convenience with urban style in one of the city’s hippest and most popular city neighborhoods.
Flint • Jun 27, 2008 4:44 pm
The only thing more irresistably hip and stylish would be building the damn thing on a Native American burial ground.
dar512 • Jun 27, 2008 5:13 pm
Anchored by Trader Joe’s and LA Fitness Health Club, it also offers an additional 50,000 square feet of retail space

Because, you know, we Americans don't buy enough stuff.
Sundae • Jun 27, 2008 7:27 pm
Anchored by Trader Joe’s and LA Fitness Health Club

Sod having balls of steel to protect you, in the US you tether your buildings with shops and gyms!
Griff • Jun 28, 2008 7:22 pm
BigV;465323 wrote:
I'll try to orient you so you can better visualize the situation. The picture in the opening post was taken facing due north.


Let this be a warning people the Cellar is everywhere watching everything. Google wants to be us.
spudcon • Jun 28, 2008 9:02 pm
Are there no zoning laws in Seattle? Most places won't allow any new construction within 100 feet of an existing home.
RellikLaerec • Jun 29, 2008 12:02 am
I think here in Ohio, there has to be a 5 foot beautification strip between the properties. I might be wrong.
Griff • Jun 29, 2008 11:33 am
spudcon;465562 wrote:
Are there no zoning laws in Seattle? Most places won't allow any new construction within 100 feet of an existing home.


Seattle is one of the most highly regulated cities planetwide. Apparently, this lady found herself at odds with the desires of the regulators.
spudcon • Jun 29, 2008 5:30 pm
So, the laws don't count if you piss off the regulators in Seattle?
xoxoxoBruce • Jun 29, 2008 5:44 pm
You're basing that on your assumption that there is some kind of restriction on building within 100 feet of a dwelling. There is no such law in most urban, and few suburban areas, anywhere I've lived.