High Dynamic Range Photography

Ibby • Jan 3, 2008 8:19 am
I'm not yet willing to shill out the hundred bucks to render HDR without an annoying little watermark but, here's some of my experimentation with HDR photo the past few days.


Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Full-size images can be found on my DeviantART - look under 'scraps' on the top-right
classicman • Jan 3, 2008 8:27 am
Wow, very cool!
Chocolatl • Jan 3, 2008 8:41 am
That last one is great. I love how the HDR brings out some of the texture and detail on the buildings.
HungLikeJesus • Jan 3, 2008 9:49 am
Is HDR photography a function of the camera or a post processing technique?
kerosene • Jan 3, 2008 10:12 am
That is really incredible, Ibram. I want to learn more about this technique.
glatt • Jan 3, 2008 10:29 am
There is an instructible on how to do HDR images with the GIMP, but I haven't had a chance to try it.

Check out the steps here.

I understand there is specialized software to make it easier.
BigV • Jan 3, 2008 10:40 am
HungLikeJesus;421196 wrote:
Is HDR photography a function of the camera or a post processing technique?


case;421202 wrote:
That is really incredible, Ibram. I want to learn more about this technique.

It is both.

Naturally, despite whatever post processing efforts are applied, the source material makes an enormous impact on the end result. Ibram chose his subjects well, photographed them well, and *then* applied this post processing technique.

So before I get to the technique, I want to say to Ibram: Wow. They're beautiful. You've done a very nice job. In the first one, the highlights in the trees almost look like noise, they're so blown out, but I like the evenness of the saturation of the greens and the blazing sun. Originally I was going to say it's my favorite, but after re-reviewing them, I like them all. Just superb. Thanks for sharing them and inspiring me.

Now for the links: one, two. Here's a brief description of the technique.

Dynamic range (DR) is a fairly generic term used in a variety of disciplines. As described above, for our purposes in photography, DR is the range of luminance values from the darkest to the brightest. The DR of the real-world scene in front of you is the range of darkest to brightest portions available to your eye, film or imaging sensor. The DR of a camera is the subset of the scene’s DR that can be captured without being clipped on the highlight end, or reduced to noise or outright blocked up on the shadow end. Conversely, the DR of a monitor is the luminance range it can display from black to white.

High dynamic range (HDR) must mean a lot of DR. But how much is “a lot?” The standard unit for measuring luminance is candelas per square meter, or cd/m2. You may have seen this unit used in monitor specifications. According to the FAQ at www.hdrsoft.com (the web site for Photomatix Pro), “the luminance of starlight is around 0.001 cd/m2, that of a sunlit scene is around 100,000 cd/m2, [… and] the luminance of the sun itself is approximately 1,000,000,000 cd/m2.”

...

Loosely speaking, then, HDR is the ability to capture and represent the full DR found in a scene with high perceptual accuracy and precision.
Happy Monkey • Jan 3, 2008 9:44 pm
Very cool, Ibram. I've tried a couple, using that GIMP tutorial, but haven't yet successfully made a picture that looks better than the source image. They just get all washed out. Maybe I'll try that photomatix thing.
Ibby • Jan 5, 2008 4:31 am
Image

Image

Image
Ibby • Jan 6, 2008 3:58 am
Image

Image

Image

Image
richlevy • Jan 6, 2008 10:36 am
I read and printed the tutorial. This spring I want to try the process at Longwood Gardens. They are fussy about allowing tripods (limited to certain hours), but this looks interesting enough to put up with the hassle.

I read what the author said about some HDR looking like paintings, and middle two shots in your first post do look like the artist's conception paintings or prints that they commission for building projects.