November 11, 2007: Badger badger badger

Undertoad • Nov 11, 2007 2:18 pm
Image

Recreating the Internet-famous Flash presentation here.
Trilby • Nov 11, 2007 2:30 pm
Snake! There's a Snake! Look out for the SNAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAKE!
Clodfobble • Nov 11, 2007 3:38 pm
I think the cat is taking the invasion in stride.
DanaC • Nov 11, 2007 3:40 pm
lol hadn't even spotted the cat til you pointed it out :P

Hiya Bri:)
ViennaWaits • Nov 11, 2007 3:48 pm
So is the cat supposed to symbolic of the snake or the mushroom?

I'm gonna have that fucking "song" in my head all day now.
Thanks. Thanks very much.

[SIZE="1"]badgerbadgerbadgerbadgerbadgerbadgerbadgerbadgermushroomMUSHROOM[/SIZE]
damn :headshake
Sundae • Nov 11, 2007 3:50 pm
Hello, tuberculosis!

They spread it in cows by sucking their udders you know.
Which is why they are prized by naturalists in this country and hated by farmers.
DanaC • Nov 11, 2007 3:54 pm
they suck cows udders? seriously?
Sundae • Nov 11, 2007 4:01 pm
DanaC;406025 wrote:
they suck cows udders? seriously?

Okay, I don't know if that really is the way it's spread, but it is a matter in debate regarding badgers and TB.

From here:
Bovine Tuberculosis (bTB) was a major problem in cattle herds earlier this century but was virtually eradicated by tuberculin testing and slaughter of infected cattle. However, bTB has persisted in southwest England, its traditional stronghold, some parts of Wales and the West Midlands, and is now increasing in other parts of Britain. Since the mid-1970s tens of thousands of badgers have been culled in response to bTB outbreaks because of circumstantial evidence that badgers spread the disease. However bTB has continued to increase in cattle. Bovine TB can be a serious problem for those farmers whose herds are affected. However it is still a relatively rare disease in the UK. To put bTB into context, in 2002 19,792 bTB reactors (cattle that gave a positive tuberculin skin test result) were slaughtered, which compares to 4,189,000 animals (including 590,000 cattle) slaughtered during the FMD outbreak1. In addition, 90,000 cattle are culled annually due to mastitis, 31,000 due to lameness and 125,000 due to infertility2.

In November 1996, the government commissioned a review, chaired by Professor John Krebs, to investigate links between bTB in cattle and badgers. The final report was published on 16 December 1997. It stated that “the sum of evidence strongly supports the view that, in Britain, badgers are a significant source of infection in cattle, although evidence is all indirect” and principally recommended that the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Fisheries (now the Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA)) should set up an experiment to quantify the impact of culling badgers3. In February 1998 the Independent Scientific Group on Cattle TB (ISG) was set up by the Government, chaired by Professor John Bourne, to advise on implementation of the recommendations in the Krebs Report, specifically the badger culling trials. On 17 August 1998 the Government published the Bourne Report4 and announced its plans for a strategy to control bTB in cattle.


Sos to be teh serious!!! :)
TheMercenary • Nov 11, 2007 4:40 pm
Holy Crap UT, where is that picture from. I would be out there with a .22 having a field day. That is just ridiculous.
TheMercenary • Nov 11, 2007 4:42 pm
DanaC;406019 wrote:
lol hadn't even spotted the cat til you pointed it out :P

Hiya Bri:)


Must be a yard ornament, there is no way a cat would just sit there with all those same sized animals walking around. Unless of course there are all the cat's friends and he invited them over.:D
Nikolai • Nov 11, 2007 6:10 pm
With that many badgers you could make alot of badger stew, so heres how its done:

1 badger
1 glass of pig's blood
1 small glass of armagnac
1 ginger root
1 bottle of dry, sparkling white wine
2 eggs
1 pot of crème fraîche
salt and pepper
500g forest mushrooms OR chestnuts to accompany
100g butter
oil

Eviscerate and skin your badger, and soak it in a fast-flowing river for at least 48 hours. This will help you to de-grease it more easily.

Once the badger is de-greased, cut it into pieces and brown it in a frying pan with butter. When the pieces are golden and stiff, flambée with the armanac, season and add a grated soup-spoon of ginger, fresh if possible.

Pour over the wine, and simmer gently for at least two hours.

At the end of the cooking time, mix the chopped badger liver (cooked beforehand in a little oil), the glass of blood, two egg yolks, a coffee-spoon of ginger and the crème fraîche, and pour into the cooking dish. Serve immediately.

This dish goes well with wild mushrooms or chestnuts.

http://www.gastronomydomine.com/2006/06/badger-stew.html
Razzmatazz13 • Nov 11, 2007 6:18 pm
Oh well...I've been wondering what to do with my extra glass of pig's blood...
Sheldonrs • Nov 11, 2007 6:49 pm
The cat is probably blaming it's owners. "Stop badgering me!!!"


(oh, like none of YOU were thinking that!!)
Gravdigr • Nov 11, 2007 7:20 pm
:band: badgerbadgerbadgerbadgerbadgerbadgerbadgerbadgerbadgerbadger:jig: :jig: :jig: :help:
lumberjim • Nov 11, 2007 8:13 pm
i don't think they're badgers at all. I think they're aardvarks.
busterb • Nov 11, 2007 8:20 pm
If they'd had these cows in Mississippi, we wouldn't have had the 55mil. beef plant flap up .
In addition, 90,000 cattle are culled annually due to mastitis, 31,000 due to lameness and 125,000 due to infertility2.
think-floyd • Nov 11, 2007 10:46 pm
On 17 August 1998 the Government published the Bourne Report4 and announced its plans for a strategy to control bTB in cattle.

That's it! send Matt Damon in to take out the Tuberculosis Badgers covertly.
DucksNuts • Nov 12, 2007 4:17 am
OK, thats fake ....right? coz none of them have shadows? ....bite me, I have never called photoshop before.

Oh and....wtf with that badgerbadgerbadgerbadgerbadgerbadgerbadgerbadgerbadgerbadger thingie?
ogwen69 • Nov 12, 2007 5:54 am
I call Photoshop i'm afraid.

IIRC Badgers are pretty territorial, and wouldn't tolerate that many rivals.

I suspect that someone has had a camera on a tripod, and taken lots of images of one badger (and the cat) in the garden over a period of time, then photoshopped.

Anyway, it can't be real, there's no mushroom and no snaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaakes
Sundae • Nov 12, 2007 6:35 am
DucksNuts;406166 wrote:
Oh and....wtf with that badgerbadgerbadgerbadgerbadgerbadgerbadgerbadgerbadgerbadger thingie?

Edited - realised UT had in fact linked the badgerbadgerbadger etc
You will pass it on to someone else Ducks. You will. Or it will drive you insane. Them's the rules I'm afriad.

BTW Nikolai, glad to see you're still around! But personally I'd drink the booze and call out for pizza :)
xoxoxoBruce • Nov 12, 2007 7:14 am
DucksNuts;406166 wrote:

Oh and....wtf with that badgerbadgerbadgerbadgerbadgerbadgerbadgerbadgerbadgerbadger thingie?
http://www.badgerbadgerbadger.com/
ZenGum • Nov 12, 2007 10:03 am
ogwen69;406167 wrote:
I call Photoshop i'm afraid.

IIRC Badgers are pretty territorial, and wouldn't tolerate that many rivals.

I suspect that someone has had a camera on a tripod, and taken lots of images of one badger (and the cat) in the garden over a period of time, then photoshopped.

Anyway, it can't be real, there's no mushroom and no snaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaakes


I agree that it is probably photoshopped, but by a different technique - I doubt a badger would hang around that long with flashes going off all the time. I guess they have one photo of a garden at night, and lots of photos of one badger mucking about against a plain (indoor/studio) background, and pasted the badger in appropriately. I've seen a similar one with scores of monkeys in a library.
Yellow #5 • Nov 12, 2007 10:24 am
Badgers ..... BADGERS! ..... We don't need no stinking BADGERS!
LabRat • Nov 12, 2007 10:39 am
lumberjim;406094 wrote:
i don't think they're badgers at all. I think they're aardvarks.



dontcha mean yardvarks?
ZenGum • Nov 12, 2007 10:58 am
LabRat;406198 wrote:
dontcha mean yardvarks?


:lol:

Vark you.

It's a dolphin, I tells ya.
Cloud • Nov 12, 2007 11:21 am
they have such strange little tails
Sarasvati48 • Nov 12, 2007 1:37 pm
What? No photoshop declarations? It is obiously the same badger, probably setting off some kind of motion flash whilst moving about the yard. The cat probably came in at the last minute, then moved out of frame...That many badgers would have had kitty for dinner...
ViennaWaits • Nov 12, 2007 6:51 pm
That's it! send Matt Damon in to take out the Tuberculosis Badgers covertly.


:notworthy Beautiful.
Elspode • Nov 12, 2007 7:51 pm
Sarasvati48;406224 wrote:
What? No photoshop declarations? It is obiously the same badger, probably setting off some kind of motion flash whilst moving about the yard. The cat probably came in at the last minute, then moved out of frame...That many badgers would have had kitty for dinner...


That would require a multiple exposure, wouldn't it? Can't be that, all the static stuff would be blurred and overexposed, and the moon would been in a slightly different position every time the camera went off.
DucksNuts • Nov 12, 2007 8:08 pm
xoxoxoBruce;406173 wrote:
http://www.badgerbadgerbadger.com/



Yeahh, I got that in UT's post....but I want to know wtf its about? why did they do it...what is it?

I NEED to know, coz the bloody kids wont stop singing it and its in my head now.
DucksNuts • Nov 12, 2007 8:09 pm
Sarasvati48;406224 wrote:
What? No photoshop declarations? It is obiously the same badger, probably setting off some kind of motion flash whilst moving about the yard. The cat probably came in at the last minute, then moved out of frame...That many badgers would have had kitty for dinner...


:eyebrow: there were
bluecuracao • Nov 12, 2007 8:16 pm
Someone skimmed a little to quickly, apparently.
ViennaWaits • Nov 12, 2007 9:20 pm
I NEED to know, coz the bloody kids wont stop singing it and its in my head now.


Please forgive me for being thrilled that I'm not the only one that suffered emotional distress due to this post. :lol2:
Sarasvati48 • Nov 13, 2007 1:43 am
Um, no...not if the flash, and the operative word is "flash" went off at a certain amount of movement from the badger. There are tons of photographs done this way. I dabble in photograpy myself. That is the same badger all over the yard...the moon could have been added later by the photographer for atmosphere with PHOTOSHOP.
HungLikeJesus • Nov 13, 2007 2:43 am
But then you would expect strong shadows, and I don't see that.
Aliantha • Nov 13, 2007 2:55 am
The photo is taken from a high aspect which shortens the shadow. If you look closely, there are shadows under the bodies though. The photo's were taken using a flash in any case which is possibly not the only light source. This also could affect the length of the shadows.

If all the photo's were taken from the same aspect, why would the shadows be in different places?
SPUCK • Nov 13, 2007 4:48 am
Yeah besides badgers are digging psychos! If there were that many about that yard would probably look like a foundation dig for a 100 story building.
DucksNuts • Nov 13, 2007 5:22 am
I dont see any shadows at all
Shawnee123 • Nov 13, 2007 9:39 am
Dare I do it again? Oh, why not.

"This is the city, Los Angeles, California. Sometimes, someone gets the urge to pet a small furry creature. That's when I go to work. My name's Friday. I carry a badger."
Happy Monkey • Nov 13, 2007 9:48 am
Elspode;406364 wrote:
That would require a multiple exposure, wouldn't it? Can't be that, all the static stuff would be blurred and overexposed, and the moon would been in a slightly different position every time the camera went off.

They could have lots of shots with one badger in each shot. Overlay them in photoshop, and bring each badger to the top. Only take the moon and other background stuff from one of the shots.

If the flash is very close to the camera lens, shadows would be hard to see at that distance.
Nikolai • Nov 13, 2007 7:28 pm
Yeah Im still here Sundae Girl, lurking in the background, trying to wait for a news article in my neck of the woods to rock yours and every other cellars lil socks off.

And Shawnee that made me laugh so hard, can just imagine you with a badger under your arm
Gravdigr • Nov 14, 2007 12:55 am
DucksNuts;406376 wrote:
Yeahh, I got that in UT's post....but I want to know wtf its about? why did they do it...what is it?

I NEED to know, coz the bloody kids wont stop singing it and its in my head now.


Are they badgering you?
DucksNuts • Nov 14, 2007 4:44 am
:right:


but they are
lumberjim • Nov 14, 2007 12:42 pm
here's a link to the real deal about this picture.