the saddest commercial i've ever seen

Rexmons • Sep 29, 2007 5:09 pm
[youtube]LR5mZqeDNtg[/youtube]
BigV • Sep 29, 2007 5:50 pm
Thank you Rexmons.

Very, very beautiful and touching.

Pass the tissues.
xoxoxoBruce • Sep 29, 2007 6:22 pm
Pretty risky behavior for the baby.
rkzenrage • Sep 29, 2007 7:22 pm
in tha rice paddy with tha whooosh whooosh, pickn tha rice with tha mom...
rkzenrage • Sep 29, 2007 7:23 pm
I need to make that video for my son. I meant to after the last stroke.
SteveDallas • Sep 29, 2007 10:50 pm
Ummm... maybe I missed the translation.. what was the commercial for? Some kind of insurance?
xoxoxoBruce • Sep 30, 2007 12:13 am
Yeah, a life insurance company.
rkzenrage • Sep 30, 2007 12:30 am
I did not find it sad at all.
DanaC • Sep 30, 2007 8:44 am
I found it horribly manipulative. Hate ads like that.
TheMercenary • Sep 30, 2007 11:33 am
DanaC;390685 wrote:
I found it horribly manipulative. Hate ads like that.


I must agree. Same goes for anti-war ads that use flag drapped coffins or tshirts with the names of someone elses loved one on them. I have no problem with frank discussions about the people who have been killed, but don't use someone elses images without explicit permission from the dead guy or his/her family.
DanaC • Sep 30, 2007 5:40 pm
I think that depends on whether or not the dead soldier has been identified. So, using their names on t-shirts surely cannot be right unless permission has been given. Flag draped coffins though have a potential anonymity. If what's being shown is a coffin with a flag over it and there's no way anybody could tell whose coffin it is, then it becomes a purely representative picture.

What I really dislike is people using consumers' fears as a means of persuading them to part with their cash.
innsaneink • Sep 30, 2007 9:14 pm
DanaC;390729 wrote:
I think that depends on whether or not the dead soldier has been identified. So, using their names on t-shirts surely cannot be right unless permission has been given. Flag draped coffins though have a potential anonymity. If what's being shown is a coffin with a flag over it and there's no way anybody could tell whose coffin it is, then it becomes a purely representative picture.

What I really dislike is people using consumers' fears as a means of persuading them to part with their cash.


If youre persuded by advertising to part with you cash, you deserve to lose the lot of it.
The choice is ultimately YOURS, the advertising is only to get you thinking.
TheMercenary • Sep 30, 2007 9:23 pm
innsaneink;390795 wrote:
If youre persuded by advertising to part with you cash, you deserve to lose the lot of it.
The choice is ultimately YOURS, the advertising is only to get you thinking.


Come on, adverts are designed to get you thinking that you will gladly part with your cash, for what ever the reason. It's all about the money.
innsaneink • Sep 30, 2007 9:29 pm
TheMercenary;390802 wrote:
Come on, adverts are designed to get you thinking that you will gladly part with your cash, for what ever the reason. It's all about the money.


Pretty much what I said.....though the adverts themselves arent what ultimatley makes our decisions, its ourselves.
Well in my case personally, anyway.
toranokaze • Oct 6, 2007 3:10 pm
We are not subjects nor citizens but consumers
rkzenrage • Oct 6, 2007 6:23 pm
I thought the idea of advertising was to manupulate... silly me.
The choice is always yours.

How else does one show the point of life insurance?
Matti • Jun 11, 2012 8:13 am
They're making sad commercials just to stir people's heart and convince them to join in their company. There's another Thai commercial, it's about a voiceless father. You can check it on youtube.
Gravdigr • Jun 15, 2012 1:57 pm
:welcome: to the Cellar Matti!
BigV • Jun 15, 2012 4:55 pm
hello Matti!
regular.joe • Jun 16, 2012 12:08 am
Holy thread resurrection Batman!
Flint • Jun 18, 2012 12:12 am
Okay... five years later did anyone change their mind on the topic?
ZenGum • Jun 18, 2012 9:45 am
This thread should have had life insurance.
Sundae • Jun 18, 2012 3:41 pm
Flint;815736 wrote:
Okay... five years later did anyone change their mind on the topic?

Nope :headshake