Cindy Sheehan is looking to take Pelosi down.
Well, the cat got out of the bag early as they so often will do. I was going to announce on July 10th (my 50th birthday) before our Journey for Humanity that I would run against House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Ca) if she didn’t put impeachment back on the table before our tour reached DC on July 23rd. Impeachment was never hers to take off the table as it is a Constitutional remedy for BushCo, not an optional smorgasbord choice. However, the story was leaked to the AP and we couldn’t keep the big announcement under wrap
I think she's figured out how badly she was used by the Democrats as well.
I was a life-long Democrat only because the choices were limited. The Democrats are the party of slavery and were the party that started every war in the 20th Century except the other Bush debacle. The Federal Reserve, permanent federal (and unconstitutional) income taxes, Japanese Concentration Camps and, not one, but two atom bombs dropped on the innocent citizens of Japan were brought to us via the Democrats. Don’t tell me the Democrats are our “Saviors” because I am not buying it especially after they bought and purchased more caskets and more devastating pain when they financed and co-facilitated more of George’s abysmal occupation and they are allowing a melt down of our representative Republic by allowing the evils of the executive branch to continue unrestrained by their silent complicity. Good change has happened during Democratic regimes, but as in the civil rights and union movements, the positive changes occurred because of the people not the politicians. Left off!
War-losers give me heartburn, and impeachmongers are all thoughtless idiots in any case. Both thumbs down, from me and my wife.
Your wife should join the Cellar. That dynamic would be very interesting.
Could be, but the odds are low -- she doesn't like this kind of BBS enough to play around on any.
She did say once, "Cindy Sheehan is proof that it's never too late for some parents to embarrass their children."
One should not let someone crazed with grief anywhere near making national policy.
One should not let someone crazed with grief anywhere near making national policy.
You are, of course, referring to Bush after 911.
Your wife should join the Cellar. That dynamic would be very interesting.
You lost me on that one??
But anyway, Cindy is becoming a republican. Her single minded bullheadedness should fit right in.
One should not let someone crazed with grief anywhere near making national policy.
Yes, it is much better to have someone just plain crazed doing so.
You lost me on that one??
I was responding to UG's comment that both he and his wife 'gave a thumbs-down to war-losers.' It would be interesting to see what Urbane's wife is like.
I would love to see her run...
into an 18-wheeler going about 85 mph. :D
Yes, it is much better to have someone just plain crazed doing so.
It is my contention in this philosophical debate that it is not rational to leave any significant expanse of the globe under the rule of anything less than a democracy. Therefore, I posit that
not doing what this Administration is doing is what's nutty as a PayDay bar.
I was responding to UG's comment that both he and his wife 'gave a thumbs-down to war-losers.' It would be interesting to see what Urbane's wife is like.
Ah, gotcha. I missed Ug's comment and thought you were talking about Griff's lovely wife. My bad.
It is my contention in this philosophical debate that it is not rational to leave any significant expanse of the globe under the rule of anything less than a democracy. Therefore, I posit that not doing what this Administration is doing is what's nutty as a PayDay bar.
Sure, creating terrorists on a wholesale scale is good for Haliburton's coffers.
It's funny... I don't care.
The Democratic leadership is so inept (I'm registered Dem... it is a LONG story) that it is just a joke to me now.
BTW, I am not a "Dem", I'm just registered that way for local reasons.
I'm voting for the weakest national Dem candidate to hurt them do Ron Paul has a better chance.
Another reason, my wife is registered Rep. We go through the ballots and whomever is the opposite of who we want to win votes for the biggest loser on the opposing ballot, we are a team.
Sure, creating terrorists on a wholesale scale is good for Haliburton's coffers.
Bruce, Bruce, Bruce... conspiracy theory? I thought you were historically literate, man. :headshake Have you no better card to play than the conspiracist card??
That's right, Halliburton's not a US company any more, remember?
Bruce, Bruce, Bruce... conspiracy theory? I thought you were historically literate, man. :headshake Have you no better card to play than the conspiracist card??
The billions to Haliburton are history, proven fact, not a theory, conspirital or otherwise... just ask the GAO. The more terrorists bush makes, the more money haliburton makes... another fact.
The more terrorists bush makes, the more money haliburton makes...
That, Bruce, is the conspiracy theory. Two Ls and a capital H in Halliburton, btw -- if you're going to convince somebody, you have to master the entire suite of facts.
The GAO doesn't create conspiracy theories.
Yet the conspiracists shriek their resentment to the skies. They've been doing less of that lately -- which I had thought indicated a time of clearer thought!
I do not understand the resentment towards Halliburton, as I am persuaded they are the sole company on the planet that could mount the kind of logistic support they were contracted to perform for us. Sounds like money-envy to me, and it sounds foolish.
If you wanted a piece of that, you should have bought shares, as I believe Halliburton is publicly traded. Had I had the loose money, I should think I should have done so.
All of which does not change the fact that;
Sure, creating terrorists on a wholesale scale is good for Haliburton's coffers.
You jumped to the conclusion I was saying it was the cause, when I was saying it was the effect.
Read for content.
I got turned off by Sheehan a while back...she was doing an interview with Robert Siegel of NPR, and he questioned her about something. It seemed like standard investigative journalism. She then got pissy with him and the rest of the interview was shit. I dunno...she kinda reminds me of a female Michael Moore.
It's funny... I don't care.
The Democratic leadership is so inept (I'm registered Dem... it is a LONG story) that it is just a joke to me now.
BTW, I am not a "Dem", I'm just registered that way for local reasons.
I'm voting for the weakest national Dem candidate to hurt them do Ron Paul has a better chance.
Another reason, my wife is registered Rep. We go through the ballots and whomever is the opposite of who we want to win votes for the biggest loser on the opposing ballot, we are a team.
Do you really think that Ron Paul has a cold chance in hell at being elected or is that just a feel good vote?