hidden messages

[COLOR=White]i wonder how much is written in white on white that we just don't see?
[COLOR=Black]how important is reading between the lines?
[COLOR=White]people could be cussing you out in white, but you'd never know it.
[COLOR=Black]do you think people, for the most part, say what they mean?
[COLOR=White]like...I do ,
[COLOR=Black]or do you think they prefer to hint at it....just in case someone calls them on it?
[COLOR=White]should we always highlight the text, just to see if there's anything there?




I think spexxvet is a cocksucker. he's the one that made me think of this

[/COLOR][/COLOR]
[/COLOR][/COLOR][/COLOR][/COLOR][/COLOR]

u dont have many friends do you.
online or in real life. Always expressing hate and discontent at dwellars you loathe for some reason.
:::waits for the ripping:::
You know, well, I know you would know, fighting online is playing in the special olympics. even if you win, you're retarded. But whatever, I expect you to tear me to shreds but in fact, I don't really care what some online dude thinks of me, I just found it totally lame that you chose this unrelated thread to degrade Spexx for a reason unknownst to me.

Well, FC, you could always take the entirety of any of the gun threads here, and decide for yourself if Spexx shows himself to be an entirely rational person.

Get him off guns, though, and Spexx comes off much better. Wouldn't be the first time somebody had a mental block the size of a Ford Expedition.

Taken in its entirety, LJ's upper paragraph reads like blank verse, and rather good blank verse at that.

freshnesschronic;351574 wrote:

u dont have many friends do you.
online or in real life. Always expressing hate and discontent at dwellars you loathe for some reason.
:::waits for the ripping:::
You know, well, I know you would know, fighting online is playing in the special olympics. even if you win, you're retarded. But whatever, I expect you to tear me to shreds but in fact, I don't really care what some online dude thinks of me, I just found it totally lame that you chose this unrelated thread to degrade Spexx for a reason unknownst to me.

Wanker. :D

[COLOR="White"]remember, you don't care....[/COLOR]

You say that like it's a bad thing.

:D is not a bad thing face.

[COLOR="White"]it's a wanker face[/COLOR]

[COLOR="White"]All work and no play makes Rexmons a dull boy. All work and no play makes Rexmons a dull boy. All work and no play makes Rexmons a dull boy. All work and no play makes Rexmons a dull boy. All work and no play makes Rexmons a dull boy. All work and no play makes Rexmons a dull boy. All work and no play makes Rexmons a dull boy. All work and no play makes Rexmons a dull boy. All work and no play makes Rexmons a dull boy. All work and no play makes Rexmons a dull boy. All work and no play makes Rexmons a dull boy[/COLOR]thats crazy[COLOR="White"] All work and no play makes Rexmons a dull boy. All work and no play makes Rexmons a dull boy. All work and no play makes Rexmons a dull boy. All work and no play makes Rexmons a dull boy. All work and no play makes Rexmons a dull boy. All work and no play makes Rexmons a dull boy. All work and no play makes Rexmons a dull boy. All work and no play makes Rexmons a dull boy. All work and no play makes Rexmons a dull boy. All work and no play makes Rexmons a dull boy. All work and no play makes Rexmons a dull boy. All work and no play makes Rexmons a dull boy. All work and no play makes Rexmons a dull boy. All work and no play makes Rexmons a dull boy.[/COLOR]

xoxoxoBruce;351609 wrote:

You say that like it's a bad thing.

I was thinking the same thing. I think it is socially acceptable to monitor ones thinking and compulsions to verbally assail someone.

skysidhe;351631 wrote:

I was thinking the same thing. I think it is socially acceptable to monitor ones thinking and compulsions to verbally assail someone.

I think Bruce was referring to something else.

Spexxvet;351633 wrote:

I think Bruce was referring to something else.

OH...I get it! It was a hidden message.;)

[COLOR=white]of course I meant cocksucker in the humurous sense and that it gave me pause. not that he actually sucks cocks[/COLOR][COLOR=white].[/COLOR] not that there's anything wrong with that.

like writing sour grapes in sour lemon juice

This thread is a paranoid's playground. :unsure:

:p

lumberjim;351558 wrote:

[COLOR=White]i wonder how much is written in white on white that we just don't see?
[COLOR=Black]how important is reading between the lines?
[COLOR=White]people could be cussing you out in white, but you'd never know it.
[COLOR=Black]do you think people, for the most part, say what they mean?
[COLOR=White]like...I do ,
[COLOR=Black]or do you think they prefer to hint at it....just in case someone calls them on it?
[COLOR=White]should we always highlight the text, just to see if there's anything there?




I think spexxvet is a cocksucker. he's the one that made me think of this

[/COLOR][/COLOR]
[/COLOR][/COLOR][/COLOR][/COLOR][/COLOR]

freshnesschronic;351574 wrote:

u dont have many friends do you.
online or in real life. Always expressing hate and discontent at dwellars you loathe for some reason.
:::waits for the ripping:::
You know, well, I know you would know, fighting online is playing in the special olympics. even if you win, you're retarded. But whatever, I expect you to tear me to shreds but in fact, I don't really care what some online dude thinks of me, I just found it totally lame that you chose this unrelated thread to degrade Spexx for a reason unknownst to me.

Urbane Guerrilla;351580 wrote:

Well, FC, you could always take the entirety of any of the gun threads here, and decide for yourself if Spexx shows himself to be an entirely rational person.

Get him off guns, though, and Spexx comes off much better. Wouldn't be the first time somebody had a mental block the size of a Ford Expedition.

Taken in its entirety, LJ's upper paragraph reads like blank verse, and rather good blank verse at that.

monster;351607 wrote:

Wanker. :D

[COLOR="White"]remember, you don't care....[/COLOR]

xoxoxoBruce;351609 wrote:

You say that like it's a bad thing.

monster;351616 wrote:

:D is not a bad thing face.

[COLOR="White"]it's a wanker face[/COLOR]

Rexmons;351617 wrote:

[COLOR="White"]All work and no play makes Rexmons a dull boy. All work and no play makes Rexmons a dull boy. All work and no play makes Rexmons a dull boy. All work and no play makes Rexmons a dull boy. All work and no play makes Rexmons a dull boy. All work and no play makes Rexmons a dull boy. All work and no play makes Rexmons a dull boy. All work and no play makes Rexmons a dull boy. All work and no play makes Rexmons a dull boy. All work and no play makes Rexmons a dull boy. All work and no play makes Rexmons a dull boy[/COLOR]thats crazy[COLOR="White"] All work and no play makes Rexmons a dull boy. All work and no play makes Rexmons a dull boy. All work and no play makes Rexmons a dull boy. All work and no play makes Rexmons a dull boy. All work and no play makes Rexmons a dull boy. All work and no play makes Rexmons a dull boy. All work and no play makes Rexmons a dull boy. All work and no play makes Rexmons a dull boy. All work and no play makes Rexmons a dull boy. All work and no play makes Rexmons a dull boy. All work and no play makes Rexmons a dull boy. All work and no play makes Rexmons a dull boy. All work and no play makes Rexmons a dull boy. All work and no play makes Rexmons a dull boy.[/COLOR]

skysidhe;351631 wrote:

I was thinking the same thing. I think it is socially acceptable to monitor ones thinking and compulsions to verbally assail someone.

Spexxvet;351633 wrote:

I think Bruce was referring to something else.

skysidhe;351636 wrote:

OH...I get it! It was a hidden message.;)

lumberjim;351642 wrote:

[COLOR=white]of course I meant cocksucker in the humurous sense and that it gave me pause. not that he actually sucks cocks[/COLOR][COLOR=white].[/COLOR] not that there's anything wrong with that.

Cloud;351646 wrote:

like writing sour grapes in sour lemon juice

Shawnee123;351649 wrote:

This thread is a paranoid's playground. :unsure:

:p

Shawnee123;351649 wrote:

This thread is a paranoid's playground. :unsure:

:p

No way [COLOR="White"]there's anything written here[/COLOR]

N[COLOR="White"]s[/COLOR]o[COLOR="White"]me[/COLOR]thing written here.




Nothing[COLOR="White"], as far as you know.[/COLOR]

Flint;351656 wrote:

.

Reading between the lines of your message, I get Quote:Quote:Quote:Quote:Quote:Quote:Quote:Quote:Quote:Quote:Quote:Quote:Quote:

his message is so hidden it's not even there at all.

You should interpret that as "scrote, scrote, scrote, scrote, scrote, scrote..."

Is everyone highlighting every post, just to make sure there's nothing hidden? I am. :tinfoil:

A little blatant self promotion, eh Spex?

Flint;351676 wrote:

You should interpret that as "scrote, scrote, scrote, scrote, scrote, scrote..."

. . . um?

. . . um? scrote?

you'll all need to do this with all of my posts from now on.....until i get bored of it and forget. [COLOR=white]cocks![/COLOR]
[COLOR=#ffffff][/COLOR]
[FONT=Arial Black][SIZE=6][COLOR=white]pickle chuggers, all of you![/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT]

glatt;351703 wrote:

A little blatant self promotion, eh Spex?

A little suspicious.

Now Al Queda is using the Cellar to send secret messages.

HLJ;351728 wrote:

Now Al Queda is using the Cellar to send secret messages.

[COLOR="White"]:lol:[/COLOR]

First, I'll warn you I'm not sure how these thing interact with different browsers.
Unless somebody has the default background setting, they may see the white against a different background.
Colors can be tricky that way.
Keep in mind you don't really know what people will see on the web.
Years ago I spent a lot of time trying to teach compusive print designers this simple truth.
Overall, they just didn't want to hear it.
Unless every piece of their web page rendered precisely down to the millimeter, they would freak.
At this point most people have worked on the web more...
Long enough, at least to be aware of some of these issues.
Leave it alone, is my advice. Who can be bothered to deal with "secret messages"??

[COLOR="White"]You can call me[/COLOR] Al Queda [COLOR="white"]I can call you Betty[/COLOR]
needs to stop [COLOR="white"]dragging my heart around.[/COLOR]

Here I go again [COLOR="white"]on my own[/COLOR]
with the lyrics thing.

SteveDallas;351730 wrote:

First, I'll warn you I'm not sure how these thing interact with different browsers.
Unless somebody has the default background setting, they may see the white against a different background.
Colors can be tricky that way.
Keep in mind you don't really know what people will see on the web.
Years ago I spent a lot of time trying to teach compusive print designers this simple truth.
Overall, they just didn't want to hear it.
Unless every piece of their web page rendered precisely down to the millimeter, they would freak.
At this point most people have worked on the web more...
Long enough, at least to be aware of some of these issues.
Leave it alone, is my advice. Who can be bothered to deal with "secret messages"??

LOL.

I am so dense. If Spexx hadn't lol'd you, I wouldn't have caught it.

Bravo.

I'm using Mozilla, and I can see the white text without highlighting.

HLJ;351741 wrote:

I'm using Mozilla, and I can see the white text without highlighting.

Ah, but that's just our hidden messages. The Al Qaida ones are written using a special chameleon color developed at high cost for use by the military

[COLOR="White"]and given to them by GWB in exchange for a gallon of gas and a lollipop[/COLOR]

monster;351768 wrote:

Ah, but that's just our hidden messages. The Al Qaida ones are written using a special chameleon color developed at high cost for use by the military

[COLOR=White]and given to them by GWB in exchange for a gallon of gas and a lollipop[/COLOR]

Lollipop? I thought it was a pretzel.

[COLOR=White]There are no hidden messages here.[/COLOR]

Nah, he choked on the pretzel [COLOR="White"]but accepted the lollipop without problem and then asked them to spank him with it[/COLOR]

This has all gotten quite silly. [COLOR="White"]fnord[/COLOR]

Wolf, for some reason your last post makes me feel uneasy and confused, and I can no longer rationally consider this subject.

The regular theme will show a tidbit of white under grey. The work-safe one is all white.

[COLOR=White] Spoiler: ctrl-A highlights all text[/COLOR]

Shawnee123;351740 wrote:

I am so dense. If Spexx hadn't lol'd you, I wouldn't have caught it.

Bravo.

:blush:

[COLOR=White][COLOR=Gray][/COLOR][COLOR=Black]You[COLOR=White]I[/COLOR]know,[COLOR=White]f[/COLOR]this[COLOR=White]y[/COLOR]could[COLOR=White]o[/COLOR]be[COLOR=White]u[/COLOR]a[COLOR=White]c[/COLOR]great[COLOR=White]a[/COLOR]way[COLOR=White]n[/COLOR]to[COLOR=White]r[/COLOR]insult[COLOR=White]e[/COLOR]people[COLOR=White]a[/COLOR]without[COLOR=White]d[/COLOR]them[COLOR=White]t[/COLOR]ever[COLOR=White]h[/COLOR]knowing[COLOR=White]i[/COLOR]about[COLOR=White]s[/COLOR]it.

But[COLOR=White]y[/COLOR]the[COLOR=White]o[/COLOR]question[COLOR=White]u[/COLOR]arises,[COLOR=White]c[/COLOR]will[COLOR=White]a[/COLOR]it[COLOR=White]n[/COLOR]ever[COLOR=White]b[/COLOR]catch[COLOR=White]e[/COLOR]on?

It[COLOR=White]a[/COLOR]just[COLOR=White]c[/COLOR]seems[COLOR=White]o[/COLOR]to[COLOR=White]d[/COLOR]be[COLOR=White]e[/COLOR]a[COLOR=White]b[/COLOR]complicated[COLOR=White]r[/COLOR]way[COLOR=White]e[/COLOR]to[COLOR=White]a[/COLOR]get[COLOR=White]k[/COLOR]a[COLOR=White]e[/COLOR]message[COLOR=White]r[/COLOR]across.



[/COLOR][/COLOR]

that was a pain in the ass, cg. codebreaker, pah.

\

LOL.

The[COLOR=White]I[/COLOR]best[COLOR=White]h[/COLOR]thing[COLOR=White]a[/COLOR]is[COLOR=White]v[/COLOR]that[COLOR=White]e[/COLOR]I[COLOR=White]t[/COLOR]can[COLOR=White]o[/COLOR]imagine[COLOR=White]o[/COLOR]people,[COLOR=White]m[/COLOR]with[COLOR=White]u[/COLOR]a[COLOR=White]c[/COLOR]pen[COLOR=White]h[/COLOR]and[COLOR=White]t[/COLOR]paper,[COLOR=White]i[/COLOR]writing[COLOR=White]m[/COLOR]it[COLOR=White]e[/COLOR]down.

i'm using my "de-coder" pen from ovaltine.;)

D-R-I-N-K-M-O-R-E-O-V-A-L-T-I-N-E

Drink more ovaltine?!


Still not as good as "Soap... poisoning..."

A + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +

Of course that does mean, like, insults in slow motion.