I don't understand the connection?
I guess because rk thinks they wasted time on this?
It's on ebay now, of course. But not selling very well.
You mean there's no cocaine in the drink? Cases upon cases bought and consumed by me thinking that I was getting much-needed cocaine?!?!? But the effect was light so I kept upping the dose??!? -[COLOR=slategray]bet Bruce has already figured out where I'm going with this[/COLOR] - so the Cocaine company LIED to me?
Hey, RK, send me the contact info for some of those lawyers you were talking about. I'm gonna SUE somebody!
:right:
They should just call it Crack instead. And when the FDA says they're glorifying drug use, they can insist, "No no! See, it's named after the body part, we're actually glorifying ass crack!"
Gives a whole new meaning to 'crack ho.'
the FDA is Evil with a capital EEEEEEEE!
If they're accusing "cocaine" of making some sort of implied claim based on their name and slogans, their time would be much better served checking actual claims by the homeopath scams you can find in every supermarket and pharmacy.
No, no, HM. This is more important because, "It's for the children"[SIZE="1"]tm[/SIZE]