Things that make you go "hmmmmmm..."

TheMercenary • Apr 28, 2007 12:32 am
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/femail/article.html?in_article_id=450995&in_page_id=1879
Elspode • Apr 28, 2007 12:44 am
I wonder if there's a burgeoning but untapped market for Faraday headwear.
duck_duck • Apr 28, 2007 12:48 am
Wow I have never heard of electrosensitivity before.
Bullitt • Apr 28, 2007 3:52 am
Image
Aliantha • Apr 28, 2007 6:25 am
This one made me go hmmmm...

fuck off you superior twat. smart arse big mouth condescnding fuckwit. everybody pull your tongues out of his butt - suck ups.
TheMercenary • Apr 28, 2007 9:11 am
Aliantha;338513 wrote:
This one made me go hmmmm... Quote:
fuck off you superior twat. smart arse big mouth condescnding fuckwit. everybody pull your tongues out of his butt - suck ups.


Yea, me too.
Happy Monkey • Apr 28, 2007 12:06 pm
duck_duck;338493 wrote:
Wow I have never heard of electrosensitivity before.
It's usually called "hypochondria" or "psychosomatic".
xoxoxoBruce • Apr 28, 2007 2:05 pm
I use to wonder, when I was a kid, how come a radio can work inside the house. Discovering the electromagnetic waves go everywhere was a little unsettling considering we operate (or not) on electrochemical impulses.

Of course the amount of waves zipping through the air is increasing exponentially. At work, everything coming in has RFID tags and you can't walk 100 feet without passing through a scanning field. At DuPont, the door would unlock as I approached with a RFID in my wallet.... in my back pocket. That means the waves had to go through me.

Calling it "hypochondria" or "psychosomatic" doesn't make it so. There are plenty of people suffering from things the majority don't. They are written off as crackpots until someone discovers the cause/effect is valid, even if it only applies to a handful of people.

If she was trying to make a buck off it, I'd be immediately suspicious but I doesn't cost me anything to give her the benefit of the doubt.
Happy Monkey • Apr 28, 2007 6:35 pm
The failure of the double-blind test makes it hypochondria or psychosomatic. If she were trying to make a buck off of it, it would be neither- it would be fraud, or a scam.
zippyt • Apr 28, 2007 6:37 pm
For while when I was young Florsent lights used to mess with me , they would fiicker and I could feel it in my teeth , just a slight buzzing , fillings ????

I can hear some scales working , Electro-magnetic compinsation load cells speficaly , they buzz when they are powered up , a few years ago I took a class and I asked the instructer about this , he said that the coil does vibrate , but most folks can't hear it .
I guess that I am just special !!!!
xoxoxoBruce • Apr 29, 2007 1:21 am
Happy Monkey;338757 wrote:
The failure of the double-blind test makes it hypochondria or psychosomatic. If she were trying to make a buck off of it, it would be neither- it would be fraud, or a scam.
What double blind test? I didn't see any reference to one in the article, did I miss something?
xoxoxoBruce • Apr 29, 2007 1:23 am
zippyt;338758 wrote:
For while when I was young Florsent lights used to mess with me , they would fiicker and I could feel it in my teeth , just a slight buzzing , fillings ????

I can hear some scales working , Electro-magnetic compinsation load cells speficaly , they buzz when they are powered up , a few years ago I took a class and I asked the instructer about this , he said that the coil does vibrate , but most folks can't hear it .
I guess that I am just special !!!!
You're lucky you don't wear hearing aids, that would ready scare you.
Clodfobble • Apr 29, 2007 9:52 am
xoxoxoBruce wrote:
What double blind test? I didn't see any reference to one in the article, did I miss something?


Almost at the very end:

Other research has backed the view of the medical and scientific establishment.

In one "provocation" study, a number of people who claimed to have electrical sensitivity were placed in a room with a mobile phone and not told whether or not it was switched on.

Asked by a researcher how they felt, they failed to establish any link between physical symptoms and the alleged trigger.

Sarah Dacre believes that this is because the tests were carried out in an area with high background electrosmog.
xoxoxoBruce • Apr 29, 2007 3:25 pm
Oh ok, I thought he mean she was double blind tested.
I agree there have been tests of different electronics gizmos and nobody has been able to prove a link to any health problems, yet. That said, I can believe that some people are bothered by them, even if it's only a handful. It'll be 50 years or more before they really know.
Happy Monkey • Apr 29, 2007 8:43 pm
Health effects are one thing- an increased incidence of cancer is possible. But if she can accurately detect whether a cell phone is on in a room she's in, she could probably get $1,000,000 from James Randi.
xoxoxoBruce • Apr 29, 2007 9:17 pm
Happy Monkey;339099 wrote:
Health effects are one thing- an increased incidence of cancer is possible. But if she can accurately detect whether a cell phone is on in a room she's in, she could probably get $1,000,000 from James Randi.
So you agree there may be long term health effects but disagree anyone could have virtually immediate effects?

Paranormal has nothing to do with it.
Ibby • Apr 29, 2007 9:34 pm
I can hear lotsa electronics. If a TV's on anywhere in the house, even if its on mute, I can hear it. It buzzes and grates on my nerves so bad. Sets my teeth on edge.

I can hear all kinds of little electronics noises. I dunno why or how or anything -- all i can say is it gets fairly annoying.

Those things like they have in store doorways to scan you as you leave are the worst.
Happy Monkey • May 1, 2007 11:26 am
xoxoxoBruce;339111 wrote:
So you agree there may be long term health effects but disagree anyone could have virtually immediate effects?
Yes. When you get an X-ray done, it could give you cancer. But you can't feel it happening. And that is much stronger than a school bus full of text-messaging teens.

I can hear some electronics, too. That's a different thing- they are emitting high-pitched sound waves. The "secret teen cell phone ring" is based on the inability of most adults to hear that high of a register. That has nothing to do with her claim. She is claiming that she can feel radio waves.
bbro • May 1, 2007 3:16 pm
:tinfoil:

She as FOIL LINING HER WALLS!!

I can hear electrical buzzing, too, but wearing a bee keeper net doesn't help it!
xoxoxoBruce • May 1, 2007 6:04 pm
It works.
zippyt • May 1, 2007 9:10 pm
It Never acured to me that this could happen :eek: :eyebrow:
Undertoad • May 1, 2007 9:47 pm
http://forums.fark.com/cgi/fark/comments.pl?IDLink=2018473
Happy Monkey • May 7, 2007 5:19 pm
Happy Monkey;339099 wrote:
Health effects are one thing- an increased incidence of cancer is possible. But if she can accurately detect whether a cell phone is on in a room she's in, she could probably get $1,000,000 from James Randi.

I was right- Randi's up for it.
Hime • May 8, 2007 1:25 pm
I wonder why this seems to have been posted in a women's-interest section of the paper. I don't really see what her being a woman has to do with the story.
Gravdigr • Aug 22, 2014 4:02 pm
Like a hijacking, only not, I'm bringing this thread back to it's title "Things That Make You Go Hmm":

[ATTACH]48917[/ATTACH]

Hmm...
Gravdigr • Aug 22, 2014 4:05 pm
Also this:

The planet Mars is populated entirely by robots.
BigV • Aug 22, 2014 4:08 pm
Gravdigr;907872 wrote:
Also this:

The planet Mars is populated entirely by robots.


as far as you know....

absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
Gravdigr • Aug 23, 2014 11:47 am
Hmm...
Gravdigr • Sep 24, 2014 10:21 am
If the President smokes weed...

...Does the guy who sells the weed that the President smokes know he's selling weed to the President? Or is there an official Presidential Dope Picker Upper?
Undertoad • Sep 24, 2014 11:18 am
If the President does something illegal,

and the Secret Service is part of the Executive Branch that administers law,

but is charged with protecting the President at all times,

...do they arrest the President... for his own safety?

If not, then protecting the President regardless of the law is their job, and the Secret Service should be buying the President's weed anonymously, and testing it for purity and potency.
manicotti • Sep 24, 2014 11:37 am
You don't have to do a drug test to be president, or a congressman, etc.

But you have to do a drug test to work at Kroger. Kroger: keeping people sober since 1883.
DanaC • Sep 24, 2014 11:40 am
Hahahaha. Manicotti that's hilarious.
BigV • Sep 24, 2014 11:43 am
Google news, on my phone, *insists* on giving me local news for Tempe, Arizona.

I've never been to Tempe, nor has my phone, to my knowledge. I've cleared all the temp files, caches, cookies, browsing history, restarted the browser, etc.

Apparently, there's something in there still. Tempe. Hmmmmmmmmm.
Gravdigr • Sep 24, 2014 11:53 am
Undertoad;910411 wrote:
...buying the President's weed anonymously, and testing it for purity and potency.


See, that's how I'm thinking...purity at the least.
xoxoxoBruce • Sep 24, 2014 2:20 pm
Remember the old bowling alley in the White House, in the cellar, no windows, good ventilation, secure... ?
Spexxvet • Sep 24, 2014 3:27 pm
When the President does it, that means that it's not illegal.

Richard M. Nixon
Gravdigr • Sep 25, 2014 4:29 pm
Undertoad;910411 wrote:
If not, then protecting the President regardless of the law is their job, and the Secret Service should be buying the President's weed anonymously, and testing it for purity and potency.


Or would they have their own grow op? Securing purity, potency, and, secrecy.
DanaC • Sep 25, 2014 4:40 pm
Does the White House have a Green Room?
Undertoad • Sep 25, 2014 4:51 pm
I like the way you all think.
Gravdigr • Sep 25, 2014 5:04 pm
DanaC;910531 wrote:
Does the White House have a Green Room?


It does!
DanaC • Sep 25, 2014 5:05 pm
Well then I think we mayhave identified its true purpose.
Gravdigr • Oct 18, 2014 3:00 pm
[ATTACH]49320[/ATTACH]

Hmm...
xoxoxoBruce • Oct 18, 2014 4:26 pm
Try it after you charge your iPhone in the microwave. :haha:
sexobon • Oct 19, 2014 1:14 am
eBay>History>Early years -
AuctionWeb was founded in San Jose, California, on September 3, 1995, by French-born Iranian-American computer programmer Pierre Omidyar (born June 21, 1967) as part of a larger personal site that included, among other things, Omidyar's own tongue-in-cheek tribute to the Ebola virus. ...
xoxoxoBruce • Oct 19, 2014 12:58 pm
I'm sure this is just a coincidence... just ask Time-Warner, you'll see. :headshake
orthodoc • Nov 13, 2014 8:46 pm
Things that make me go hmmm ... I had to contact Mr. Wonderful Surgeon today because I'm working with a committee to start a huge program that I am the main driver for ... Mr. WS might be of help, but isn't necessary. He's competent but not indispensable, definitely not essential. I happen to know that he's wanted something like I can offer him for some time.

He returned my message via text, asked who this is (after saying in the grocery store that he still has my cell), and when informed, sent me two texts of cherries. TWO cherry emojis.

I'm thinking we'll be looking elsewhere for the equivalent of his skillz. They were never so mad, after all. Sometimes karma can be a real bitch, you know?

I am hoping that the gentlemen of Teh Cellar will respond with their takes on what TWO cherry emojis might mean. Just in case I have misinterpreted.
glatt • Nov 14, 2014 8:48 am
I don't even know WTF a cherry emoji is. Sorry. Clueless over here.
Undertoad • Nov 14, 2014 9:22 am
All of this indicates that he is not up to speed on wireless technology.
Gravdigr • Nov 14, 2014 4:39 pm
glatt;914181 wrote:
I don't even know WTF a cherry emoji is. Sorry. Clueless over here.


[ATTACH]49610[/ATTACH]

Maybe? I have nfc, either.
xoxoxoBruce • Nov 14, 2014 4:43 pm
I'm also clueless, although I found this by accident today.
sexobon • Nov 14, 2014 6:09 pm
It means you didn't hit the jackpot with him (3 cherries on a slot machine) and it will cost you more to continue to play.
orthodoc • Nov 14, 2014 6:17 pm
That's the one, grav. It's in with the fruits in the emoji categories. I was embarrassed, thinking I was sadly out of touch, and then I googled it and some people think it means bisexuality and others think it just generally refers to sex.

No jackpot for him.

Who responds to a business message in that way? I bet this guy is just a sweetheart on Tinder.
Sundae • Nov 14, 2014 6:55 pm
No Cherries were harmed in this bizarre episode.
Except my eyeballs, seeing that.
Undertoad • Nov 14, 2014 7:00 pm
OMG he's bisexual??

I happen to know that he's wanted something like I can offer him for some time


Oh I misinterpreted this sentence the first time.

~ or did i ~
orthodoc • Nov 14, 2014 7:24 pm
xoxoxoBruce;914224 wrote:
I'm also clueless, although I found this by accident today.


Thank you, sweet Bruce. :)
orthodoc • Nov 14, 2014 7:41 pm
Undertoad;914236 wrote:
OMG he's bisexual??



Oh I misinterpreted this sentence the first time.

~ or did i ~


Haha he'd have a heart attack at being thought to be bisexual, but a couple years ago he was looking for a woman who'd be happy to take part in a threesome. I had the impression it was a bucket list thing. I wasn't interested.

What I have to offer him now is a strictly professional (medically speaking) opportunity he's wanted.

It makes me feel better that the cherry emoji thing really is meaningless, as in: he's clueless, not me.
classicman • Nov 14, 2014 11:05 pm
I'm still clueless. Someone please explain WTF happened in like really REALLY basic English.
xoxoxoBruce • Nov 15, 2014 12:00 am
She's been assigned to hand out sandwiches.
He wants a particular one of them really badly.
He offered her sex if she gives him the sandwich he wants.
He's a silly rabbit, no tricks for him. :headshake
Undertoad • Nov 15, 2014 2:46 am
Either that or he couldn't use his phone and managed to type something vague and google-able while trying to text "OK".
orthodoc • Nov 15, 2014 11:10 am
That's a possibility, UT - a twice-sent typo. But I did ask for clarification, and have received nothing further.
sexobon • Nov 15, 2014 11:59 am
The imagery is subject to wide interpretation; so, can't be used against him as easily as his words can in a saved text.

No response to your request for clarification could be designed to draw you into face to face communication which would be illegal for you to record.

He has already given any recruiter sufficient grounds (non-professional response) to discontinue recruitment and continued pursuit can no longer be construed as being in the line of duty.

Should you continue, for personal reasons, to take it to the next level with face to face interaction, have a witness with you at all times. There's absolutely no excuse for any problems to arise as a result of you letting yourself be alone with him. You're the pursuer: he didn't come to you for the job.
Gravdigr • Nov 15, 2014 2:15 pm
You could send him this:

[ATTACH]49616[/ATTACH]

That might get the message across.
orthodoc • Nov 15, 2014 2:23 pm
Given his lack of response to a request for clarification, I think your analysis is correct, sexobon. The unprofessional reply does give me justification for recruiting elsewhere. If the committee really wants to pursue him in particular, I'll just send him an email invite to a committee meeting and let them talk to him. I don't intend to meet with him privately.
orthodoc • Nov 15, 2014 2:24 pm
Gravdigr;914271 wrote:
You could send him this:

[ATTACH]49616[/ATTACH]

That might get the message across.


:lol:

If only ...
DanaC • Nov 15, 2014 5:44 pm
It's sometimes used to suggest that the person has won the prize (kind of like sayng 'bonus'). So, afterhe asked who was messaging him (having not recognised the number) when you said it was you, he may have been saying bonus - or it was the job offer that was the prize (I suspect it was you being the sender that was the bonus though).
Gravdigr • Dec 20, 2014 4:02 pm
[ATTACH]49870[/ATTACH]