Sheryl Crow says you use too much toilet paper

Undertoad • Apr 23, 2007 12:45 pm
via Washington Post

I propose a limitation be put on how many sqares [sic] of toilet paper can be used in any one sitting. Now, I don't want to rob any law-abiding American of his or her God-given rights, but I think we are an industrious enough people that we can make it work with only one square per restroom visit, except, of course, on those pesky occasions where 2 to 3 could be required. When presenting this idea to my younger brother, who's judgement [sic] I trust implicitly, he proposed taking it one step further. I believe his quote was, "how bout just washing the one square out.
Sheryl: I'm pretty sure I know why Lance dumped you, and why you can't keep any other guy for longer than a few weeks. Evidence:

1) You're an insufferable nag over every little tiny thing.
2) Your ass hygiene is utterly foul.

Some guys can get past your #1 but none are going to get past your #2.
piercehawkeye45 • Apr 23, 2007 12:47 pm
Haha, this is really stupid.
TheMercenary • Apr 23, 2007 12:49 pm
She is an idiot, but I like her singing.
Shawnee123 • Apr 23, 2007 12:50 pm
What a twit!

I heard she's been remaking some of her songs:

The First Butt is the Deepest

Soak Up Your Bung

If It Makes You Nappy

All I Wanna Poo
Sundae • Apr 23, 2007 1:12 pm
One square per visit?
Two-three is a pesky occasion?

I am assuming this is a joke that has been taken seriously by a gullible journalist...? I hope so. Either that or you have some kind of uber toilet paper over there that you are not sharing with the rest of the world.

One square barely soaks up the drips after I've had a wee. And I keep myself very tidy down there - I imagine the square count would be much higher if I was fully furred. And using two-three squares in the pesky event of having a poo... well anyone who has discovered they are down to the end of the last roll after they've committed will tell you it isn't ideal. Putting your finger through the sheet anyone?

Bleuch - I agree that many people use an unnecessary amount, but there are much more pressing issues to be discussed. And when you do choose to discuss it, at least be realistic. I'd rather she suggested the Arab way of using water (and sometimes a cloth) than an unrealistic ration of the existing tools.
Cloud • Apr 23, 2007 1:50 pm
I have one word: wipies
BrianR • Apr 24, 2007 10:09 pm
I have always said that there is a deplorable lack of bidets in America.

Maybe now something good will come of her ranting.

In the meantime, I use as much as I deem necessary to clean myself.
And I have a box of wipes handy, too.
Scopulus Argentarius • Apr 24, 2007 10:22 pm
"A Change Would Do You Good?"

That girl is funky in the truest sense.

If we'd listen to her we'd be waving the shitty finger at her.
rkzenrage • Apr 24, 2007 10:26 pm
It was a joke.
Undertoad • Apr 24, 2007 10:28 pm
So she says the day after the idea is broadly mocked.
rkzenrage • Apr 24, 2007 10:36 pm
Look at the whole thing in context.
TheMercenary • Apr 24, 2007 10:47 pm
rkzenrage;337236 wrote:
It was a joke.

yea, nice try... she is trying to cover her ass (with one double ply bit of Charmin), and it ain't workin... :D

Image
Happy Monkey • Apr 25, 2007 12:50 pm
Wait, you guys thought she was serious originally?

Come on, she's human. Nobody uses one square.
milkfish • Apr 25, 2007 1:57 pm
I'd go along with the program, as long as someone started producing TP in rolls that are 30 cm wide.
Clodfobble • Apr 25, 2007 3:24 pm
Happy Monkey wrote:
Nobody uses one square.


I saw a military-style survival show on television once where the guy explained how you really do wipe with one sheet when conservation is key to survival.

1.) Fold sheet in half twice
2.) Tear tiny piece off the appropriate corner, such that when you open it back up there is a small hole in the middle of the sheet. (Save the little piece.)
3.) Stick your middle finger through the hole.
4.) Wipe once very smoothly, using the finger as a sort of squeegie.
5.) Pinch tightly around the base of the middle finger with the other hand and pull upwards, so that in removing the square of toilet paper you also remove the residue on the middle finger as you move up.
6.) Use the tiny piece from the center to clean under your fingernail.

He swore this was accepted practice among his colleagues. I don't think I'll be trying it.
Shawnee123 • Apr 25, 2007 4:03 pm
:::squirming in seat:::
glatt • Apr 25, 2007 10:54 pm
Clodfobble;337428 wrote:

6.) Use the tiny piece from the center to clean under your fingernail.

He swore this was accepted practice among his colleagues. I don't think I'll be trying it.


I've heard the same thing from a soldier once. I don't buy it. I think it's kind of like snipe hunting for civvies. How can it be sanitary to use a finger? If I were being shot at and had just one sheet, I'd simply not wipe. Things would get kind of crusty, but it would be better than the severe abdominal distress after eating rations with a dirty finger.
wolf • Apr 25, 2007 11:14 pm
Cloud;336761 wrote:
I have one word: wipies


I'm sure they cause some other sort of ecological destruction, between the fresh-smelling chemicals and plastic boxes they come in.

These ecofreaks won't be happy until we are all foul-smelling hippies.
monster • Apr 25, 2007 11:30 pm
glatt;337575 wrote:
I've heard the same thing from a soldier once. I don't buy it. I think it's kind of like snipe hunting for civvies. How can it be sanitary to use a finger? If I were being shot at and had just one sheet, I'd simply not wipe. Things would get kind of crusty, but it would be better than the severe abdominal distress after eating rations with a dirty finger.



I was taught that in the scouts. But as Glatt said, if you were that desperate for wipeables, you probably wouldn't care. In the real world we need more.
xoxoxoBruce • Apr 25, 2007 11:56 pm
Toilet maker warns its popular bidets may catch fire
Associated Press
TOKYO — Japan's leading toilet maker Toto Ltd. is offering free repairs for 180,000 bidet toilets after wiring problems caused several to catch fire, the company said today.

The electric bidet accessory of Toto's Z series caught fire in three separate incidents between March 2006 and March 2007, according to company spokeswoman Emi Tanaka. The bidet sent up smoke in 26 other incidents, the company said.

"Fortunately, nobody was using the toilets when the fire broke out and there were no injuries," Tanaka said. "The fire would have been just under your buttocks."

The company will repair 180,000 toilet units manufactured between May 1996 and December 2001 for free, she said. A manufacturing defect is thought to have led to the faulty wiring.

Toto has been a pioneer in high-tech toilets fitted with pressurized water sprayers — a standard fixture in Japanese homes.

The popular Z series features [COLOR="Magenta"]a pulsating massage spray, a power dryer, built-in-the-bowl deodorizing filter, the "Tornado Wash" flush and a lid that opens and closes automatically.[/COLOR] Prices range from $1,680 to $2,600.

The model is not sold overseas.
How many rolls of toilet paper would you have to burn to make the electricity to power those bidets?
lumberjim • Apr 26, 2007 2:33 am
i for one, welcome our new bidet overlords
DucksNuts • Apr 26, 2007 6:16 am
:whofart:
BigV • Apr 26, 2007 11:27 am
monster;337591 wrote:
I was taught that in the scouts. But as Glatt said, if you were that desperate for wipeables, you probably wouldn't care. In the real world we need more.


It is a cautionary humorous urban legend in our scout troop too.

It was a joke, people. For all I know, she was trying to yank Karl Rove's chain. I read that he flinched and yelped "Don't touch me!" when she put her hand on his arm while making a point. If so, good job.
Urbane Guerrilla • May 5, 2007 6:23 am
I'm a little surprised nobody's publicly invited Cheryl to kiss, um, theirs. To make sure it's nice and clean, of course.

Can't wait to see what The Continuing Crisis pages of American Spectator will make of this.

Meanwhile, Cheryl, let's see those fingernails, girl.:thepain:
cowhead • May 6, 2007 1:05 am
yet another reason you ought not listen to musicians... especially famous ones...