Avatars

TheMercenary • Apr 1, 2007 12:20 am
Why does this forum not use them? is it a bandwidth issue?
elSicomoro • Apr 1, 2007 12:26 am
I like them, but UT (and others) have argued that they make a board look like shit.
Undertoad • Apr 1, 2007 8:20 am
It's one of a small handful of "executive decisions" by me and I stand by it. Here, you are recognized for your words alone.
Elspode • Apr 1, 2007 12:52 pm
Well, your words and the odd nipple pic.
DanaC • Apr 1, 2007 1:54 pm
*nods* Yep.
xoxoxoBruce • Apr 1, 2007 2:53 pm
Undertoad;329282 wrote:
It's one of a small handful of "executive decisions" by me and I stand by it. Here, you are recognized for your words alone.
Hear, hear, no sleazy stuff.
Aliantha • Apr 1, 2007 9:20 pm
Bruce, why are you using Kagen's signature?
Beestie • Apr 1, 2007 9:35 pm
Avatars. Not.
DucksNuts • Apr 1, 2007 9:57 pm
We dont need no stinking avatars!!

I dislike them too
Undertoad • Apr 1, 2007 10:10 pm
To go a step further with this, on other forums I follow, the avatar one-upsmanship is getting crazy - everyone wants theirs to stick out, so now there are more and more animations - it just gets worse.

Animations are the very worst thing you can have on a page you're trying to read. You're trying to figure out what's being said, and all the while there's a big area, an inch away from the words, moving and changing colors and trying to get your attention.
monster • Apr 1, 2007 10:16 pm
Couldn't agree more. Totally agree with both avatar and smilie policies. (Don't mind avatars, but it's too much work to draw the line between discrete signatures and garish infomercials -if it were my job where I mod, I'd go for the no avatar option too :lol:)
Aliantha • Apr 1, 2007 10:20 pm
Plus pages with avatars take a long time for dial up users to load.
monster • Apr 1, 2007 11:25 pm
Aliantha;329450 wrote:
dial up users



say what? My grandma was a dial-up user in the war. rationed minutes, constant fear of calls dropping. scary times. Do you still have outside dunnies? :p
Aliantha • Apr 1, 2007 11:38 pm
Only in the very colonial parts of the country monster.
TheMercenary • Apr 2, 2007 8:39 am
Ok, thanks for the replys.
elSicomoro • Apr 2, 2007 9:34 am
Over at The Bosque, we use avatars, but nothing too extreme. I think my avatar of an arrested James Brown is the most "over-the-top."
wolf • Apr 2, 2007 11:06 am
You have had several over the top avatars, but the godfather of soul is the best of them.

You have a lot more control over the content though.

I keep pointing out this board as the ultimate bad example ... animated avatars AND huge blinky signatures.
TheMercenary • Apr 2, 2007 12:06 pm
sycamore;329572 wrote:
Over at The Bosque, we use avatars, but nothing too extreme. I think my avatar of an arrested James Brown is the most "over-the-top."


A lively bunch you have over there... http://ciberbosque.org/viewtopic.php?t=1110&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0
BigV • Apr 2, 2007 12:24 pm
NO.

Sometimes I know just what my post will be before even reading the thread.
xoxoxoBruce • Apr 2, 2007 4:30 pm
Aliantha;329422 wrote:
Bruce, why are you using Kagen's signature?
Because he told me I should try, I'd like it.
xoxoxoBruce • Apr 2, 2007 4:35 pm
wolf;329600 wrote:

I keep pointing out this board as the ultimate bad example ... animated avatars AND huge blinky signatures.
Good grief..... especially the sigs.
Aliantha • Apr 2, 2007 6:11 pm
xoxoxoBruce;329721 wrote:
Because he told me I should try, I'd like it.



AH I see. Well that's interesting then. Personally, I'm glad you're using something different now. As Ducks said, you came close to getting a couple of lewd PM's. ;)
xoxoxoBruce • Apr 2, 2007 7:00 pm
Whew, that was close. My old heart couldn't take that.
Cloud • Apr 4, 2007 12:08 am
the lack of avatars makes recognizing people and navigating threads harder. just my 2cents
xoxoxoBruce • Apr 4, 2007 12:15 am
But maybe they'll read with less partiality that way?
Sundae • Apr 4, 2007 7:33 am
I prefer not having avatars.
Like wearing uniform in school, it forces everyone to appear equal.