March 14, 2007: Excavation around house

Undertoad • Mar 14, 2007 12:09 pm
Image

I'm not selling to you developers!

Ah yes, the reluctant dweller. Here in the US, we have zoning laws to ensure that landowners can't just do whatever they want with their property, and eminent domain laws to ensure that the government can take it from them if someone more powerful wants the land for something else.

For the most part, we also have developers that don't begin work unless everything's ready. Don't want to waste the labor in digging a big hole, if you're just gonna have to fill it in again.

According to the full story, the owners have connections with the government. But now they have no connection to the world, as the excavation is 40 feet deep. Watch that first step, it's a doozy.
Griff • Mar 14, 2007 12:16 pm
scratching Red China off moving to new country list
Sheldonrs • Mar 14, 2007 12:34 pm
Oh well, there goes the neighborhood.
Shawnee123 • Mar 14, 2007 12:42 pm
Are they renting out?
bluecuracao • Mar 14, 2007 12:43 pm
Now they have to commute to work via parachute, like the guy in that car commercial.
Shawnee123 • Mar 14, 2007 1:02 pm
"Hey Bobby, will you run over to Mrs McGillacuddy's and borrow a cup of sugar?"

"Sure, Mommmmmm[COLOR="DimGray"]mmmmmmmmmmm[/COLOR][COLOR="Gray"]mmmmmmm[/COLOR][COLOR="Silver"]mmmmm...[/COLOR]"
Trilby • Mar 14, 2007 1:24 pm
Arthur Dent would be proud
Elspode • Mar 14, 2007 1:25 pm
"A man's home is his castle." "No man is an island." A man's home *can*, however, be an island, castle or not.

They must bury their electrical, sewer and water supplies *really* deep in China...'cause I don't see any going to that building.

I'll bet their kids behave really well. Getting kicked out of the house could be really painful.

Fill that sucker in, and you've got a pretty damn fine moat.

Pizza guys hate to deliver here.
Tomtheman5 • Mar 14, 2007 4:06 pm
Sheldonrs;323001 wrote:
Oh well, there goes the neighborhood.


:lol: Quite possibly the funniest (and most appropriate) thing I've ever read on Cellar!
Kitsune • Mar 14, 2007 4:34 pm
Another holdout.
SPUCK • Mar 14, 2007 9:20 pm
Yeah... I've seen that house! And leave it to HP to paint their name on the roof!
Armygrognard • Mar 15, 2007 5:31 am
Undertoad;322995 wrote:
Image

I'm not selling to you developers!

Ah yes, the reluctant dweller. Here in the US, we have zoning laws to ensure that landowners can't just do whatever they want with their property, and eminent domain laws to ensure that the government can take it from them if someone more powerful wants the land for something else.

For the most part, we also have developers that don't begin work unless everything's ready. Don't want to waste the labor in digging a big hole, if you're just gonna have to fill it in again.

According to the full story, the owners have connections with the government. But now they have no connection to the world, as the excavation is 40 feet deep. Watch that first step, it's a doozy.


I wouldn't be so sure about the U.S. and any laws protecting us. As we saw in the Kelso case in Connecticutt, the homeowners lost, and the Supreme Court affirmed the eminent domain action. In numerous other states, similar attempts are made every year. While I was in Georgia, the State Legislature attempted a bill that would allow the eminent domain proceedings to go on in private, and the first you, the homeowner, would hear about it is when you were served the paperwork. It was defeated/killed, fortunately.

The Supreme Court effectively said U.S. citizens have no property rights. The good news is some states are enacting laws to further protect the citizens, so some good may have come from it. Still, I don't like what that decision portends.
Trilby • Mar 15, 2007 5:41 am
Hi Armygrognard. Welcome to the cellar!
Griff • Mar 15, 2007 7:29 am
Armygrognard;323213 wrote:

The Supreme Court effectively said U.S. citizens have no property rights. The good news is some states are enacting laws to further protect the citizens, so some good may have come from it. Still, I don't like what that decision portends.


UT and I live in PA, one of the better property rights states, not ideal but not Red China either. I'm 100% with you on Kelo, the Supreme Court attacked a fundamental liberty on that one.
Griff • Mar 15, 2007 12:19 pm
File this under pig finds pearl.
Democracy Now is for once offended:
Police Kill 12 Protesting Expropriation in India
In India, at least twelve people were killed after police opened fire on villagers opposing the forced expropriation of farmland in West Bengal. The Indian government wants to use the land to create a tax-free industrial park for an Indonesian chemical firm. More than five hundred police were deployed. Authorities had not tried to enter the area since January due to local opposition.
SquadRat1 • Mar 15, 2007 3:07 pm
Kitsune;323063 wrote:
Another holdout.


Thats HP Pavilion...and I think the "house" is a security building of some kind for the parking lot.
xoxoxoBruce • Mar 15, 2007 3:44 pm
Hey, at least in India they kill you so finding another place isn't a problem. :rolleyes:
Welcome Armygrognard, medical corps? How'd we get lucky enough for you to find us?

Thanks Bri.
Undertoad • Mar 22, 2007 5:00 pm
Image

Higher quality image.

Image

Angry homeowner.

From here.

Chongqing citizen Wu Ping who refuses to move out from her old house, shows the Constitution of China and her determination to withstand possible force removal of her house, in southwest China's Chongqing Municipality, on March 21, a day before the deadline of moving sentenced by local court. Wu refused to go in a compensation disagreement with the real estate developer.
Griff • Mar 22, 2007 5:23 pm
I guess the grabbing your copy of the Constitution is universal in these things and in the end meaningless.:(
DanaC • Mar 22, 2007 8:00 pm
Here in the US, we have zoning laws to ensure that landowners can't just do whatever they want with their property, and eminent domain laws to ensure that the government can take it from them if someone more powerful wants the land for something else.


We have property development regulations controlling what anyone can do with their land/buildings. In order to substantially alter the appearance or function of a building or piece of land one must first acquire planning permission from the council, that permission must be granted or refused with regard to the Council's agreed Unitary Develpoment Plan. But.....we also have something called Compulsory Purchase Orders, which Council's can issue against land/building/house owners, whereby they have to sell to the Council in order for largescale public works or major town alterations to take place.
zippyt • Apr 2, 2007 11:57 pm
They trashed it !!!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/6520317.stm
bluecuracao • Apr 3, 2007 12:01 am
Mrs Wu, when told the house had been demolished, reportedly said: "Oh well."


I wonder how big her grin was when she said that?
Cloud • Apr 3, 2007 12:14 am
In my town, they built a new FBI facility . . . around both sides of a car wash, which refused to give up the land.
xoxoxoBruce • Apr 3, 2007 8:37 pm
I'll bet they have a list of every patron and how often then wash their car, as well as soil and fiber samples from each wash.
Armygrognard • May 15, 2007 9:20 am
Brianna;323215 wrote:
Hi Armygrognard. Welcome to the cellar!


Hi Brianna, thanks for the welcome and my apologies for being so rude as to not respond earlier.

Great forum, just never sent the link home so I could visit after work.

I'll try to do better... ;)
Armygrognard • May 15, 2007 9:22 am
xoxoxoBruce;323347 wrote:
Hey, at least in India they kill you so finding another place isn't a problem. :rolleyes:
Welcome Armygrognard, medical corps? How'd we get lucky enough for you to find us?

Thanks Bri.


Hey Bruce, thanks for the welcome. As with Brianna, my apologies for the rudeness.

No, I am Military Intelligence. You know, the "oxymoron". Yeah, I had to get that one out of the way, right away.

I'll visit more, I promise!
BigV • May 15, 2007 10:30 am
Armygrognard;343499 wrote:
Hey Bruce, thanks for the welcome. As with Brianna, my apologies for the rudeness.

No, I am Military Intelligence. You know, the "oxymoron". Yeah, I had to get that one out of the way, right away.

I'll visit more, I promise!
Maybe, maybe not.

But I sure hope so. I'd love to have a first person account/contact with someone familiar with military intelligence (spoken with zero irony, cross my heart).