lumberjim • Mar 7, 2007 12:12 pm
I think several of us have recieved notes fram a little bird that suggests that we should keep the language clean on the IOTD threads. There are valid reasons for and against that. what do you think?
In the above scenario, one would simply need to avoid the "bot" by substituting characters, IE "fvck" or "ƒuck" for fuck. (Alt+0131 = ƒ)Sundae Girl;321023 wrote:... I tend to find crudity amusing, and if I thought of something that really, really made me laugh I'd be gutted if I couldn't post it. ...
Flint;321028 wrote:[SIZE="4"][COLOR="Red"]Red Alert[/COLOR][/SIZE] - UT's account has been hacked, by a lunatic!
Elspode;321044 wrote:My 'Net Nanny is strange. It will display several f***'s , but one too many, and it clamps down on the whole page...
Shawnee123;321047 wrote:So Net Nanny believes there is a certain number of fucks one is allowed; one extra fuck and next thing you know you're taking the Blasphemy Challenge. :eyebrow:
In the IOtD thread, because it's UT's baby and the way most people come to the Cellar, I'd really like to see the language cleaned up so net nanny doesn't knock people off. A lot of people, surfing from work, have to contend with censoring software.I started doing this about the beginning of December.
Not a rule, not an order, just an idea of mine I'm floating, to help keep the IOtD available to as many as possible.
xoxoxo Bruce
Undertoad wrote:IotD seeing growth
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Since the beginning of the year there has been additional attention paid to IotD from the web in general.
The number of unique visitors to Cellar and IotD in February is over 10000 per day. This is up from an average of around 7000 in November/December.
Of those 10000 visitors, I estimate that 7000 are IotD viewers and 3000 are Cellar forum viewers.
In addition, the bandwidth used for Cellar and CellarIotD is now officially insane. More and more threads with attached images become popular. I've been posting larger and more images per IotD and these IotDs are now archived and visited by more people.
The additional traffic to IotD has increased the amount they generate from the Google ads, and so IotD now earns the Cellar like $50/month which goes into the connection bill. In addition, I've put Google ads on the Cellar archives which generates an additional $15/month or so (still early on that figure).
It's not enough offset to discourage the tip mug yet - we still need the mug, especially while I'm unemployed and can't put my own money into it. But things are improving.
I didn't want to bring it up for discussion because I think Tony will stand on principle that he doesn't censor anyone, even though it's fucking with his income. So I've been suggesting directly, when ever it happens.I was right there also.
xoxoxoBruce wrote:lumberjim][quote=xoxoxoBruce][quote=lumberjim][quote=xoxoxoBruce]In the IOtD thread, because it' wrote:
You don't have to respond.
I've introduced a thought, which you can mull and incorporate it in your thinking or discard it.
I've no wish to censor or chastise or regulate anyones behavior, just put it out there for consideration....for the benefit (I think) of the people that suffer net nanny, and Tony's IOtD.
I've proposed the idea to a half dozen people with only one person arguing unamerican censorship.
I haven't posted it for discussion because I'd rather avoid the debate and those opposing, demonstrating their right to be as vulgar as possible in IOtD.
yeah, well that's most of my confusion. a behind the scenes movement may make a few think twice about cursing, but if no one else knows that it's even something to be concerned about.....???
I think that if this is something you feel would be beneficial in a general sense, and people mainly agree with you.....i'm not one of those people that feels the need to rebel against a rule or guideline just because it's there. [COLOR=Red]But for your idea to have any result at all, it would have to be publicly known.[/COLOR]
If you don't think it is an appropriate thread for you to start as a moderator, I'd pose the question for you. I won't do it if you'd rather i didn't, and [COLOR=Red]I don;t see any reason to refrain from using blue language if I'm one of seven people that know about this.[/COLOR] Not trying to be a dick, understand....just....i curse. i'm a curser. i like to type like i talk.
I will try to comply if the consensus is that we should censor ourselves, however. .... I'm also a team player.[/quote]
Well, I'm pretty crude myself most of the time and hadn't thought about it until a couple of people complained about net nanny not letting them see certain threads.
So, I started watching IOtD, because it's so important to Tony, and separate from the rest of the Cellar, in that it's the window other webmasters use to see and judge him by. Actually it's been pretty clean, which surprised me.
You can certainly start a thread, if you wish, but I'll bet Tony gives his speech about his mother teaching him there are no bad words, at an early age.
But I still think consideration for how important that one thread is to him, would be the least we could do for him. Just my opinion though, no big deal.[/quote]
Flint;321025 wrote:In the above scenario, one would simply need to avoid the "bot" by substituting characters, IE "fvck" or "ƒuck" for fuck. (Alt+0131 = ƒ)
Agreed, I'm not suggesting enforcement or castigation. and my intention was not to stir up any shit. Which is why I was mentioning to people, I thought would be a good idea to show some consideration if possible. It seemed to be working out, without oppressing anyone, because the people that post regularly set the tone of the thread even if they don't realize it. :dunce:Monster wrote:Yes I agree, a suggestion, but not an enforcement is the way to go. But the odd slip up is not going to hurt -coming down hard on those who slip up might.
DucksNuts;321155 wrote:I hate censorship, its soooo subjective.
xoxoxoBruce;321250 wrote:Simple, she hates the C word. :lol:
Larry;321247 wrote:I know someone who will only let her kids use curse words beginning with A or B. I suppose it makes some kind of sense to them, but I just don't see it.
wolf;321398 wrote:There are some real beauties in the A-B range, after all.
monster;321403 wrote:Bollocks!
Billions of billious barbecued blue blistering barnacles!
Shawnee123;321458 wrote:My favorite:
Shawnee123;321463 wrote:Absolutely, or the Wiz of Oz:
You clinking, clanking, clattering collection of caliginous junk!
Aliantha;321547 wrote:but that's only the a's and b's. Where's all the rest?
Larry;321247 wrote:I know someone who will only let her kids use curse words beginning with A or B. I suppose it makes some kind of sense to them, but I just don't see it.
Flint;321404 wrote:[COLOR="White"]... ... [/COLOR] Asshole.