6/29/2006: Animatronic flesh shoe

Undertoad • Jun 29, 2006 1:28 pm
Image

Slight sent this along, and it sort of fits well with yesterday's item, the gumball Hummer. This is also edgy art; it's called Animatronic Flesh Shoe, by artist Adam Brandejs. Not actual flesh, but a good simulation; and the point is, when you're looking at this thing, it moves:

Image

from the link wrote:
The shoe is stitched together with multiple pieces of latex rubber cast out of moulds made from my own skin. The shoe's toe and heel raise and lower as it occasionally vibrates/pulsates, and twitches on the floor as if it were still alive. The movement is not constant, and usually causes people to jump back while they are in the middle of leaning in for a closer look.

Artist statement
It's a Nike shoe stapled together with human flesh, twitching...

Other than simply being twisted, this piece comments on issues of sweatshop labour and content ownership. Each piece of skin is therefore different in colour, size, and texture and the Nike Logo is done in white, slapped overtop of all the other colours.

We live in a culture disconnected from what it is doing to itself and others, we choose to ignore rather than deal with the reality we have created for ourselves. This piece ultimately comments on this simple idea.
But like much art, you can enjoy this on many levels if you wish.
barefoot serpent • Jun 29, 2006 1:30 pm
Just don't do it
glatt • Jun 29, 2006 1:35 pm
It may be art. But it's ugly.
axlrosen • Jun 29, 2006 1:35 pm
I love how in art, you get to sound smart by stating all the profound issues that your art comments on, without having to actually specify what that comment is, or how your art makes that comment.
Happy Monkey • Jun 29, 2006 1:38 pm
If you could say it, you wouldn't need to make the art.
xoxoxoBruce • Jun 29, 2006 1:42 pm
I guess it's for running away from the skin gun.:eek:
Emrikol • Jun 29, 2006 2:36 pm
xoxoxoBruce wrote:
I guess it's for running away from the skin gun.:eek:


...the artist at work? :greenface
capnhowdy • Jun 29, 2006 11:15 pm
I'm with glatt on this one. Art CAN be ugly.
Size 10. Finally a shoe manufacturer who considers the one legged customer.
Elspode • Jun 30, 2006 1:17 am
A truly dedicated artist would have made it from his own *actual* skin so that it would smell really bad as well as being incredibly ugly and disgusting. Slacker.
Torrere • Jun 30, 2006 3:07 am
DISGUSTING! This might be the vilest IotD that I have ever seen.
TropicFever • Jun 30, 2006 7:32 am
Not the first thing I needed to see on my screen this morning.

I bet it would get really tiresome keeping the dogs away from these shoes.
Griff • Jun 30, 2006 7:57 am
Yah, I threw up a little...
Sundae • Jun 30, 2006 8:51 am
I think it's strangely beautiful. And if the artist's comment hadn't included the information re ignoring the reality of our purchases I'd be suggesting that myself as the reaction it provokes in me.

Although the child in me still thinks it would be a great thing to hide in the fridge at work. HA! Try pinching my yoghurts now - didn't realise I was Ed Gein's daughter did you?
srom • Jul 4, 2006 9:18 pm
what's not to get about this piece? it's pretty gross, but it wouldn't make any sense if it was pretty.