This site has my "stamp of approval"

Flint • Mar 28, 2006 4:58 pm
You'll all be glad to know, you have been rated as "acceptable"
Trilby • Mar 28, 2006 4:59 pm
well. We're all veklempt.
capnhowdy • Mar 28, 2006 10:00 pm
Thank You
SteveBsjb • Mar 28, 2006 10:03 pm
hahaha @ Brianna's response
Kagen4o4 • Mar 29, 2006 12:00 am
thankyou so much, you have no idea how little this means to me.

dont waste time with unimportant crap.
Flint • Mar 29, 2006 12:06 am
The genuinely funny thing about this is how I was totally serious and not joking at all when I posted that. Also, how I didn't do it just to draw out the predictable response you so kindly posted for me. Thanks, Kagen, you're my "straight man" :::smooch::: you'll get used to me . . .

(To clarify, and prevent further confusion, I was serious about the "stamp or approval" but joking about y'all caring about it)
Kagen4o4 • Mar 29, 2006 4:20 am
ooo look at me! im making people happy! im the magical man, from happyland, in a gumdrop house on lollypop laaaaane.

the ag'ers that burst through the door of the dinner party shouting about what happened at the pissup down the street have calmed down and sat on the couches, waiting to hear of our night now. so grap a beer, spark a joint/bong/crack pipe, sit back and let the soothing sound of mari's voice and the site of bri's perky breasts (all breasts are perky here bri, even yours), carry you off into a wonderful land of mystery and insight.
seakdivers • Mar 29, 2006 4:34 am
Wheeew. I was worried that I had been wasting my time 'till now.
Trilby • Mar 29, 2006 5:54 am
Kagen4o4 wrote:
the ag'ers that burst through the door of the dinner party shouting about what happened at the pissup down the street have calmed down and sat on the couches, waiting to hear of our night now. so grap a beer, spark a joint/bong/crack pipe, sit back and let the soothing sound of mari's voice and the site of bri's perky breasts (all breasts are perky here bri, even yours), carry you off into a wonderful land of mystery and insight.


Dude. I've no idea what you are talking about. Don't be mean to me just because you can. have a reason at least! :(
SteveBsjb • Mar 29, 2006 6:18 am
Some senses of humor here are great. Message board humor is great when people "get it". The Homer Simpson line was appreciated, Kagen!
Kagen4o4 • Mar 29, 2006 6:36 am
Brianna wrote:
Dude. I've no idea what you are talking about. Don't be mean to me just because you can. have a reason at least! :(



im sorry :sniff: just trying to be playful. would you like some chocolate? :)
Trilby • Mar 29, 2006 6:55 am
Kagen4o4 wrote:
im sorry :sniff: just trying to be playful. would you like some chocolate? :)


Ohhh, yes please! And some french fries with mayo, too, right? ;)
Kagen4o4 • Mar 29, 2006 7:20 am
Brianna wrote:
Ohhh, yes please! And some french fries with mayo, too, right? ;)


im australian not english!! how about chips and gravy? but definately some mouth watering aussie cadbury chocolate.
wolf • Mar 29, 2006 6:41 pm
A bag of flaming dogshit is not technically a "stamp," of approval, or anything else.
SteveBsjb • Mar 29, 2006 6:53 pm
Well, it's SOMETHING else.

I still like Brianna's response.

Anyway, to Kagan, how is making a thread that others don't like a waste of time. If you don't like, isn't easier to just not open it? How much time is really wasted?
capnhowdy • Mar 29, 2006 8:13 pm
Sometimes I get bored enough to feed post builders and attention whores.

Ever thought of the W/A thread? Just saying.
DucksNuts • Mar 29, 2006 8:31 pm
capnhowdy wrote:
Sometimes I get bored enough to feed post builders and attention whores.


I'm fairly sure I resemble that remark.:neutral:
wolf • Mar 30, 2006 2:41 am
You're 'Straylan. You come by it honestly.

Okay, maybe dishonestly, given your national history. But you have such a good time going about it.

Do you ride a kangaroo to work?
DucksNuts • Mar 30, 2006 4:51 am
wolf wrote:


Do you ride a kangaroo to work?


I find the ol Emu gets better *mileage*.
Kagen4o4 • Mar 30, 2006 7:04 am
DucksNuts wrote:
I find the ol Emu gets better *mileage*.


dont give in to them. its "kilometreage"

kangaroos are just like rats in american. except our "rats" provide good steaks :yum:
MaggieL • Mar 30, 2006 9:43 am
Kagen4o4 wrote:
dont give in to them. its "kilometreage"
Like they say, "In for a centiEuro, in for 453.59 grams."
capnhowdy • Mar 30, 2006 8:14 pm
psssttt.... don't say "grams" here. :lol:
JayMcGee • Mar 30, 2006 8:21 pm
*diverts PoliceWoman strip-o-gram away from capn at the last moment*
Flint • Mar 30, 2006 8:23 pm
@JayMcGee: cardigans are my schtick btw . . .

Every day I wear cardigans, undershirts, walking shoes.
capnhowdy • Mar 30, 2006 8:28 pm
:cop: :bolt:
JayMcGee • Mar 30, 2006 8:32 pm
mmmm... nOt sure what u mean by 'schtick'......


still, my fave cardigan at the mo' is an orange cable-knit with simulated leatherette buttons.
Flint • Mar 30, 2006 8:33 pm
"simulated leatherette buttons" ??? okay . . . you win.
Rock Steady • Mar 31, 2006 1:14 pm
SteveBsjb wrote:
Well, it's SOMETHING else.

I still like Brianna's response.

Anyway, to Kagan, how is making a thread that others don't like a waste of time. If you don't like, isn't easier to just not open it? How much time is really wasted?


As a percentage of my Cellar time, a lot. I whiz thru, cherry pick some topics, spend time on those topics, and skip a lot of threads. The longer the list of topics, the harder it is to pick and choose. It's better for me when NewPosts results don't span mulitple pages.
FallenFairy • Mar 31, 2006 1:26 pm
Flint wrote:
@JayMcGee: cardigans are my schtick btw . . .

Every day I wear cardigans, undershirts, walking shoes.


and NO PANTS!?!
Damn I'm coming to Texas!!:lol:
Flint • Mar 31, 2006 1:28 pm
Flint wrote:
Every day I wear cardigans, undershirts, walking shoes.
- that's with my scrubs.
SteveBsjb • Mar 31, 2006 1:32 pm
Rock Steady wrote:
As a percentage of my Cellar time, a lot. I whiz thru, cherry pick some topics, spend time on those topics, and skip a lot of threads. The longer the list of topics, the harder it is to pick and choose. It's better for me when NewPosts results don't span mulitple pages.


What is the percentage, and how much actual time though?
monster • Mar 31, 2006 10:03 pm
SteveBsjb wrote:
how is making a thread that others don't like a waste of time. If you don't like, isn't easier to just not open it? How much time is really wasted?


I reckon that's the BB version of "If a tree falls in the forest but nobody hears it, does it make a sound?" :lol:
SteveBsjb • Apr 4, 2006 8:25 pm
The way I heard it the tree does make a sound but it doesn't make a noise.

A sound doesn't have to be heard.

A noise (to be a noise) has to be heard.
Rock Steady • Apr 5, 2006 2:25 am
SteveBsjb wrote:
What is the percentage, and how much actual time though?


You fuckin' bean counters drive me nuts. Does it matter what the real percentage is? What matters is if I just stop going to the Celler because of my perception that it sucks when people spam the New Posts list. It just fucking sucks. Can you measure sucks? Perception is marketing reality.
SteveBsjb • Apr 5, 2006 8:12 am
So, it's not a "waste of time" that's all I wanted to know. It only takes a second or two to scan a screen for threads you want to read. Unless you're a slow reader, I guess.

I think the addition of AG'ers (and anyone) to this board is a good thing. Many probably agree now, and will in the future.

And I don't think there has been a lot of spamming going on. There have been threads that have dropped off the screen, but even those were efforts.

I think the difference is that AG'ers like to debate in their threads. People here may think they are arguments, tied to bad feelings; when really we've all be close message-board acquaintances for years, and this is how we roll. One thread we argue, the next we laugh, and the next advise each other. It's all fun.

It's even fun if there is a spammer that we can all gang up on, or ignore together.

Some people stay away from message boards due to all the foul language found in posts.
Flint • Apr 5, 2006 9:22 am
I think more people, more posts, and more activity is a good thing! It means your community is a thriving metropolis. By comparison, if nobody posted here, there wouldn't be much human interaction, would there?

Rock Steady wrote:
Perception is marketing reality.


I agree, there appears to be a huge disparity in the perception of acceptable message board use. My opinion, and you don't have to agree with me, but it is a public message board, and my opinion is that if you have to scan all new posts in order to find any signs of human activity then your threshold of expectations is skewed towards the low side.

Are fewer posts always better? If nobody ever posted here would the site be perfect?
glatt • Apr 5, 2006 9:48 am
Flint wrote:
I think more people, more posts, and more activity is a good thing! It means your community is a thriving metropolis. By comparison, if nobody posted here, there wouldn't be much human interaction, would there?



A good message board will find a healthy balance. The Cellar has found that balance.

At the one extreme, you have places like Fark where hundreds of people are fighting to try to make their mark and be heard above the din, all making stupid one line posts. You can read through a typical thread on Fark and find one or two posts with merit, but the rest is crap. Fark has hundreds of active users. That sounds like the world you are advocating. I'm not interested in it.

Your thriving Metropolis analogy is an interesting one. I don't want to live in New York City. I prefer living in a smaller place where I can put down some roots and run into people I know when I go out.

Of course we want the Cellar to be active. New posts are good. Activity is good. But the activity should be good activity, not activity just for activity's sake.
Flint • Apr 5, 2006 9:52 am
glatt wrote:
A good message board will find a healthy balance.


I agree.


glatt wrote:
one extreme...That sounds like the world you are advocating.


It isn't. How did you arrive at that conclusion?

glatt wrote:
the activity should be good activity, not activity just for activity's sake.


Again, I agree.
SteveBsjb • Apr 5, 2006 9:53 am
Who says what is "good" activity? Maybe there should be a book burning... I mean thread deleting mod here. Who can be trusted to figure out what is "good"?

And... what's wrong with my home town? NYC is one of the greatest cities in the world.
glatt • Apr 5, 2006 9:56 am
Flint wrote:
It isn't. How did you arrive at that conclusion?


It sounded like you were saying "The more activity the better." If that's not what you are saying, then I obviously misunderstood.
Flint • Apr 5, 2006 9:59 am
@glatt: My question was a hypoythetical: is less activity always better? Same thing, looked at from the other side. I agree with what you said, the board will find a balance, what is known in nature as homeostasis.
Happy Monkey • Apr 5, 2006 12:09 pm
SteveBsjb wrote:
And... what's wrong with my home town? NYC is one of the greatest cities in the world.
And there are Farks and Slashdots for that NY feel. Some people like to visit NY, but live in Springfield.
SteveBsjb • Apr 5, 2006 12:13 pm
Oh well, guess I don't fit in here... maybe I should just move along, then. Buh-bye!


Just kidding, I'm stayin.
Flint • Apr 5, 2006 12:17 pm
Yes, me too, see you guys later ::: leaves :::