|
Current Events Help understand the world by talking about things happening in it |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
02-29-2012, 12:16 PM | #16 |
Person who doesn't update the user title
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 13,002
|
Howdy, I'm Trespass Bill, and I'm the rootinest tootinest cowboy this side of the Pecos. Yeeeeehaaaaaa! Tell y'all whut I'm gonna...duh-huh...
Last edited by infinite monkey; 02-29-2012 at 12:26 PM. |
02-29-2012, 12:20 PM | #17 |
Makes some feel uncomfortable
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 10,346
|
__________________
"I'm certainly free, nay compelled, to spread the gospel of Spex. " - xoxoxoBruce |
02-29-2012, 12:32 PM | #18 |
Person who doesn't update the user title
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 13,002
|
|
02-29-2012, 01:59 PM | #19 |
barely disguised asshole, keeper of all that is holy.
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,401
|
I've found conflicting info on who voted against this here
This shows two R's and one D voted against. ETA - I also found that the two bills are identical = H.R.347 & S.1794 Still nothing on Boehner. Perhaps its because he is the speaker?
__________________
"like strapping a pillow on a bull in a china shop" Bullitt |
02-29-2012, 02:05 PM | #20 |
Person who doesn't update the user title
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 13,002
|
Nope. Speaker can vote. I wasn't sure either (though that didn't make sense I thought maybe...) so I looked it up.
He's only voted twice in 2012: http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote...&person=400036 Weird. I really do wonder what the explanation is. They just totally left Ohio's 8th district off the list. |
02-29-2012, 02:14 PM | #22 |
barely disguised asshole, keeper of all that is holy.
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,401
|
Govtrack doesn't have anything on H.R. 347 since 2/6/12
the link I posted is from clerk.house.gov - which is usually correct... (shrug)
__________________
"like strapping a pillow on a bull in a china shop" Bullitt |
02-29-2012, 02:18 PM | #23 |
barely disguised asshole, keeper of all that is holy.
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,401
|
I wonder why so many didn't vote on this. That is their job, after all.
I never really understood why we vote someone in to represent us and then when its time to make a decision, they don't. I'm sure this had nothing to do with it being an election year.
__________________
"like strapping a pillow on a bull in a china shop" Bullitt |
02-29-2012, 03:27 PM | #24 |
™
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 27,717
|
Well, Giffords took a bullet in the brain, so I'll give her a pass. But I though she had resigned? I'm confused.
|
03-01-2012, 10:31 PM | #26 |
erika
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: "the high up north"
Posts: 6,127
|
I just read a point by point debunking of this that I can't link to on my phone (and my landlords a dick and unplugged the Internet so no computer Internet, thank god for 3G), but, when I can go back and cite next week, remind me to put up the data. The gist is, this only slightly changes the language of EXISTING legislation. It is a little bit worse than what's on the books, and expands what's on the books to include the white house and vp's residence. As he put it, " if I were in congress I'd vote against it", but it's not egregious. At least compared to what's already law.
__________________
not really back, you didn't see me, i was never here shhhhhh |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|