Bill Cosby Now Officially A Sexually Violent Predator

[Glinda]

Cosby was just handed a jail sentence of three to ten years.

Looking at a maximum sentence of 10 years behind bars for the 2004 rape of a former Temple University employee, Bill Cosby today was formally designated as a sexually violent predator. Link

Couldn't happen to a more deserving guy.

*spit*

[Gravdigr]

I didn't catch that he was violent.

[xoxoxoBruce]

I hadn't heard that either, just that he talked them into taking ludes and screwed them while they were blotto.

[fargon]

Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce

I hadn't heard that either, just that he talked them into taking ludes and screwed them while they were blotto.

Kinda takes all the fun rite out of it.

[Happy Monkey]

Drugging counts.

Originally Posted by wikipedia

Coercion, with regard to sexual violence, can cover a whole spectrum of degrees of force. Apart from physical force, it may involve psychological intimidation, blackmail or other threats – for instance, the threat of physical harm, of being dismissed from a job or of not obtaining a job that is sought. It may also occur when the person being attacked is unable to give consent – for instance, while drunk, drugged, asleep or mentally incapable of understanding the situation.

[xoxoxoBruce]

OK, dat splain it. Thanks.

[Gravdigr]

Ok, so now we're all violent rapists.

Yes you are, too.

Ever had sex w/drunk partner?

Then you are a sexually violent predator.

But, I was drunk.

No, you're responsible.

My partner was drunk.

No, they're not responsible when they're drunk, just you.






Having said that...I'm drunk.

[tw]

"Cosby sentenced to prison, classified as violent sexual predator"

http://www.nbc-2.com/story/39168916/...olent-predator

One can dislike the male's new responsibilities. But it is now a requirement.

Cosby's actions were, by definition, violent.

[DanaC]

Originally Posted by Gravdigr

Ever had sex w/drunk partner?

Then you are a sexually violent predator.



.

No - it just means you might be a sexually violent predator.

The notion of inability to consent as it relates to drunken sex is important because it replaces the assumption that a drunk woman must have been willing, or is culpable when raped.

Context matters - as does intent. Two equally drunk people getting their funk on at a party is not the same thing as a a guy deliberately plying a girl with enough alcohol to pass out and then using her for his own entertainment.

[Clodfobble]

Voluntarily drunk is not the same as secretly dosed with drugs. Many of Cosby's women didn't know they'd had a drug slipped into their drink.

[tw]

Originally Posted by Clodfobble

Many of Cosby's women didn't know they'd had a drug slipped into their drink.

And still some guys claim those woman got what they wanted. Ironically, every one of those guys is a Trump supporter.

[lumberjim]

Originally Posted by tw

And still some guys claim those woman got what they wanted. Ironically, every one of those guys is a Trump supporter.

This is what I read.

I suggest to you that your opinion of the Donald has clouded your judgement. To say that every guy that claims those women got what they wanted is a Trump supporter is a ridiculous leap born from your emotional aversion to all things Trump. How do you know that any guys even think that?

Your glass house of emotion has several cracks, bub.

[tw]

Originally Posted by lumberjim

To say that every guy that claims those women got what they wanted is a Trump supporter is a ridiculous leap born from your emotional aversion to all things Trump.

Now go back and finally read what was posted. Only discussed were the some guys (I know) who said they got what they wanted. The word 'all' was never used. But was inserted by lumberjim to read only what he wants to see. Obviously I must know those 'some guys' to also know they are all Trump supporters.

Obviously the word 'some' is not 'all'. But must be explained to one with a 5th grade comprehension level - such as The Don.

The Don has a long history of not keeping his penis inside his pants. And is a serial womanizer. The perfect patsy for spies and American enemies. Womanizers are easily converted into traitors. Tend to lie constantly. And really do believe women got what they wanted.

Bill Cosby used the same 'violence inspired' lies to attack his victims. And said in a deposition that they wanted it. Using lumberjim logic, he agrees with and supports Cosby and The Don. He believes womanizing is good. tw does not use that logic. lumberjim does. Will he deny it? Or continue reading only what he wants to see.

[lumberjim]

Was that logic or emotion speaking?

[lumberjim]

[MASSIVE image of burn ointment deleted by glatt - sorry]