The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Politics

Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-14-2011, 06:31 PM   #166
Lamplighter
Person who doesn't update the user title
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bottom lands of the Missoula floods
Posts: 6,402
In the GOP foreign policy debate Sunday in South Carolina, candidates were asked
whether they believed the U.S. should waterboard terror detainees.

This question did two things totally unique to this year's debates.
It resurrected the ghost of Dick Cheney on the issue of water boarding, and
it brought emphatic, yet matching responses from President Obama and Senator McCain.

Michele Bachmann explicitly endorsed waterboarding:
Quote:
“If I were president, I would be willing to use waterboarding.”
"I’m on the same side as Vice President Cheney on this issue".
Cain told the debate moderators:
Quote:
“I don’t see it as torture. I see it as an enhanced interrogation technique,”
Ron Paul, in contrast, upset a portion of the partisan crowd by declaring:
Quote:
"water boarding is torture" and reminding the crowd that
"torture is illegal" under both US and international laws.

"Why would you accept the position of torturing a hundred people because
you know one person might have information?" Paul asked,
“I think it’s uncivilized. It would have no practical advantages
and is really un-American
to accept on principle that we will torture people we will capture.”
Huntsman, agreed, saying,
Quote:
"We diminish our standing in the world and the values that we project,
which include liberty, democracy, human rights and open markets, when we torture."
Reactions from McCain and Obama were:

John McCain said:
Quote:
“Very disappointed by statements at SC GOP debate supporting waterboarding.
Waterboarding is torture.”
President Obama responded: Let me just say this:
Quote:
They’re wrong. *Waterboarding is torture. *It’s contrary to America’s traditions.
It’s contrary to our ideals. *That’s not who we are. *That’s not how we operate.
We don’t need it in order to prosecute the war on terrorism. And we did the right thing by ending that practice.
If we want to lead around the world, part of our leadership is setting a good example.
And anybody who has actually read about and understands the practice of waterboarding
would say that that is torture. *And that’s not something we do, period.
And besides all that:

Today Herman Cain showed that he is a manly man, with a link back
to Red Skelton's skits about the "Mean 'ittle Kid":

"Manly" men like more pizza toppings
Quote:
Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain said in an interview
with GQ Monday that one can tell how "manly" a man is by looking at
how many toppings he puts on his pizza.
He also said a pizza covered in vegetables is a "sissy pizza."

"The more toppings a man has on his pizza, I believe the more manly he is," <snip>.

Cain, laughing, then explained that "the more manly man is not afraid of abundance"
before calling into question the manliness of a pizza with vegetables on it.
"A manly man don't want it piled high with vegetables!
He would call that a sissy pizza," Cain said.

Those were not the only food-related comments Cain made in the interview.
Cain has compared himself to black walnut ice cream;
asked what flavor Mitt Romney would be, Cain responded, "just plain vanilla."
He went on to call Rick Perry "rocky road" and deem
Michele Bachmann "tutti-frutti" after initially insisting, when asked about Bachmann,

"I'm not going to say it. I'm not going to say it."
"I know I'm going to get in trouble!," Cain said after deeming Bachmann tutti-frutti.
.
Lamplighter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2011, 06:36 PM   #167
DanaC
We have to go back, Kate!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 25,964
Calling Pelosi 'Princess Nancy' really pissed me off.



Why? How? WTf is this man doing at the forefront of politics? I mean....I am assuming he isn't as thick as he appears to be (roughly the thickness of two short planks) ... because that really would be scary. But if he isn't as thick as he appears to be then he has no fucking excuse for his unreconstructed, macho, sexist, homophobic dickery.
__________________
Quote:
There's only so much punishment a man can take in pursuit of punani. - Sundae
http://sites.google.com/site/danispoetry/
DanaC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2011, 07:01 PM   #168
Happy Monkey
I think this line's mostly filler.
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: DC
Posts: 13,575
You can't go wrong in the Republican party when insulting Nancy Pelosi.
__________________
_________________
|...............| We live in the nick of times.
| Len 17, Wid 3 |
|_______________| [pics]
Happy Monkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2011, 07:23 PM   #169
Undertoad
Radical Centrist
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cottage of Prussia
Posts: 31,423
After this weekend's 60 Minutes, hating Pelosi should be some sort of bipartisan thing.
Undertoad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2011, 07:52 PM   #170
Lamplighter
Person who doesn't update the user title
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bottom lands of the Missoula floods
Posts: 6,402
Quote:
Originally Posted by Undertoad View Post
After this weekend's 60 Minutes, hating Pelosi should be some sort of bipartisan thing.
While I still really admire Pelosi, she was a deer in the headlights in that show.
Lamplighter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2011, 08:03 PM   #171
Griff
still says videotape
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,813
I'm shocked just shocked... that 60 Minutes is still on television.
__________________
If you would only recognize that life is hard, things would be so much easier for you.
- Louis D. Brandeis
Griff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2011, 08:09 PM   #172
Happy Monkey
I think this line's mostly filler.
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: DC
Posts: 13,575
It looks to me like Pelosi and Boehner were added to pad the guy's book with big names, when he really only found a smoking gun with the unknown guy from Alaska.
__________________
_________________
|...............| We live in the nick of times.
| Len 17, Wid 3 |
|_______________| [pics]
Happy Monkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2011, 11:17 PM   #173
Clodfobble
UNDER CONDITIONAL MITIGATION
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 20,012
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanaC
Why? How? WTf is this man doing at the forefront of politics? I mean....I am assuming he isn't as thick as he appears to be (roughly the thickness of two short planks) ... because that really would be scary.
Well I'll say it, since I find it unlikely anyone else will: Cain is in the forefront at this exact moment in time because he is black. It's the same reason John McCain chose a female running mate back in 2008. Because you have to have something to counter the people who vote purely on idealism--both the racists who would vote against him no matter what, as well as the symbolists who would vote for him no matter what in order to ensure we finally got our first African-American president.

If the Republicans run a black guy, maybe they can head off at the pass all the people who would vote for the black guy over the white guy no matter what. If the Republicans run a black guy, then the marginally racist members of the base can make the effort to vote for him to prove that 'some of their best friends (candidates) are black.' The best way for everyone to show that race has nothing to do with anything, is to run a candidate of a matching race. If Hilary Clinton had won the democratic primary and then the presidency, then Bachmann or Palin or someone else with a uterus would be polling with undeservedly high numbers right now instead.
Clodfobble is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2011, 11:43 PM   #174
ZenGum
Doctor Wtf
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Badelaide, Baustralia
Posts: 12,861
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lamplighter View Post
While I still really admire Pelosi, she was a deer in the headlights in that show.
I can has explanation plz?
__________________
Shut up and hug. MoreThanPretty, Nov 5, 2008.
Just because I'm nominally polite, does not make me a pussy. Sundae Girl.
ZenGum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2011, 12:21 AM   #175
Lamplighter
Person who doesn't update the user title
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bottom lands of the Missoula floods
Posts: 6,402
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZenGum View Post
I can has explanation plz?
60 Minutes TV show had a segment on how members of congress are exempt from "insider information trading laws" because they are privy to information about upcoming Bills in committees, etc.

The reporter started with Pelosi in what looked like a large press conference, asking if she thought it was ethical for the Speaker to invest in stocks based on such insider information.

Pelosi looked (to me) as though she was caught completely unawares, and tried a couple of times to divert the question.
Finally, she denied she or her husband made such investments.
This was my "deer in the headlights"

Next, the reporter confronted Boehner with the same question, and Boehner gave a similar denial.

Then the reporter talked about several other Congressmen (heads of committees, etc) doing the same thing.
Lamplighter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2011, 12:37 AM   #176
classicman
barely disguised asshole, keeper of all that is holy.
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,401
Never admired her, this just gave me more reason to dislike her ... and the rest of them all the more.
__________________
"like strapping a pillow on a bull in a china shop" Bullitt
classicman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2011, 12:45 AM   #177
ZenGum
Doctor Wtf
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Badelaide, Baustralia
Posts: 12,861
Thanks LL.

So, she poorly handled a loaded question, but there's no evidence (yet) that she was doing insider trading, is that it?
__________________
Shut up and hug. MoreThanPretty, Nov 5, 2008.
Just because I'm nominally polite, does not make me a pussy. Sundae Girl.
ZenGum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2011, 05:09 AM   #178
DanaC
We have to go back, Kate!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 25,964
Quote:
Originally Posted by Undertoad View Post
After this weekend's 60 Minutes, hating Pelosi should be some sort of bipartisan thing.
Oh I wasn't objecting to him hating Pelosi. But referring to her as 'Princess' in that context was dodgy as fuck. particularly coming from a man who is desparately trying to make people think he has respect for women.

The equivalent, in my view would be if one of the Democrats referred to Cain as Uncle Tom.



@ Clod: thanks for the explanation. When you spell it out like that it makes more sense.
__________________
Quote:
There's only so much punishment a man can take in pursuit of punani. - Sundae
http://sites.google.com/site/danispoetry/
DanaC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2011, 08:14 AM   #179
Lamplighter
Person who doesn't update the user title
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bottom lands of the Missoula floods
Posts: 6,402
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZenGum View Post
Thanks LL.

So, she poorly handled a loaded question, but there's no evidence (yet) that she was doing insider trading, is that it?
Well, you know how accurately you can read someone's facial expressions ?
She looked guilty as all h;;;.
Boehner had one of Sandy's painted stone faces.

I would say the reporter was on to something that probably involves all of Congress.
But then, sometimes I'm just can't help being cynical.
Lamplighter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2011, 10:45 AM   #180
Undertoad
Radical Centrist
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cottage of Prussia
Posts: 31,423
Yeah, I'm sure it's a problem for all of Congress. Fuckers are getting rich playing games. Pelosi is one of the worst examples, to sum up:

Through her husband, in 2008, Pelosi bought at least $1.3M, maybe a much greater amount, of Visa stock.

Some of it was bought during Visa's IPO, and it's not clear whether this was an invite-only party, or an excellent investment decision on behalf of Mr. Pelosi.

Shortly thereafter, the legislation that led to the BoA $5 surcharge was debated and passed through committee. (Here's our thread discussing it.) We found that it had a $19B impact on banks in 2009 (a much greater amount in 2008) but apparently it would have a similar impact on Visa.

It failed to come up for a vote in the House. Pelosi is roughly the person who decides which bills will go to a vote.

A year later in 2009, similar legislation was introduced, passed committee again, gained additional support, and again failed to come up for a vote.

Finally in 2010 it gained more support and was passed.

In her defense, Pelosi offers that a Cardholders Bill of Rights passed in 2009 and the card companies didn't like it. But that didn't hurt Visa as much as the interchange fees matter, and in the meantime, the IPO shares doubled in price.

Hastert's example is also particularly obvious. He bought a bunch of worthless land. Then he got earmarked money to build a highway next to it. Then he sold the land for $2M.

Can it be proven that they intended to make money from these deals, probably not. They merely did. But since we are stuck in the false dichotomy of left-right politics, it can all be written off as partisan attack, and there will always be people to defend them.
Undertoad is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:30 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.