The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Technology
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Technology Computing, programming, science, electronics, telecommunications, etc.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-17-2011, 08:44 PM   #1
footfootfoot
To shreds, you say?
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: in the house and on the street-how many, many feet we meet!
Posts: 18,449
Tin Eye for your hard drive. Sort of...

I'm trying out this new duplicate image finder software that appears to work like TinEye-- it looks at the pixels rather than file name or hash. It is scanning my drive now. It's been about an hour and it has scanned 14,000 out of 24,000 images and found 3700 similars. I am guessing it doesn't "see" RAW files, but it does "see" DNG so there's a case for DNG conversion as a matter of course in asset management.

I'll report back when the thing is done and let you know how well it works and how useful it is. Having something like this working with picasa or lightroom would be hella awesome.

awesome duplicate photo finder
__________________
The internet is a hateful stew of vomit you can never take completely seriously. - Her Fobs
footfootfoot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2011, 09:48 PM   #2
footfootfoot
To shreds, you say?
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: in the house and on the street-how many, many feet we meet!
Posts: 18,449
OK
notes so far:
Took 1:45 to scan 24,354 jpgs and bmp. didn't scan gif, raw or psd files. It found 5626 duplicates and rated their similarity from 1% to 100% Pretty good, but gave 14% accuracy to the same image where one version was full sized and the other was 750x500. Conversely it gave 100% accuracy to two adjacent frames where the images were clearly different. So it seems to weight size more heavily than image information.

There is a confirm delete button and an acknowledgement of delete button and no provision for multiple selections so numerous deleting is a chore.

It only compares two images at a time, not sure what happens when you have five versions of the same image.
You can't save a search, so the next time I do this I have to allow for nearly two hours to scan my drive.
__________________
The internet is a hateful stew of vomit you can never take completely seriously. - Her Fobs
footfootfoot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2011, 01:52 PM   #3
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
Sounds a little cumbersome for 24k images, but might be ok for a couple k.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2011, 10:50 PM   #4
Flint
Snowflake
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Dystopia
Posts: 13,136
You gonna organize your files better from now on?
__________________
******************
There's a level of facility that everyone needs to accomplish, and from there
it's a matter of deciding for yourself how important ultra-facility is to your
expression. ... I found, like Joseph Campbell said, if you just follow whatever
gives you a little joy or excitement or awe, then you're on the right track.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Terry Bozzio
Flint is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2011, 08:34 AM   #5
footfootfoot
To shreds, you say?
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: in the house and on the street-how many, many feet we meet!
Posts: 18,449
I promise I will name all my files and put them in the proper folder.
I promise I will name all my files and put them in the proper folder.
I promise I will name all my files and put them in the proper folder.
I promise I will name all my files and put them in the proper folder.
I promise I will name all my files and put them in the proper folder.
I promise I will name all my files and put them in the proper folder.
I promise I will name all my files and put them in the proper folder.
I promise I will name all my files and put them in the proper folder.
__________________
The internet is a hateful stew of vomit you can never take completely seriously. - Her Fobs
footfootfoot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2011, 09:14 AM   #6
Pete Zicato
Turns out my CRS is a symptom of TMB.
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Chicago suburbs
Posts: 2,916
I can tell you from experience that filing only helps. It does not eliminate the problem.

The major issue is the fallacy of categorization. There isn't anything that fits in only one category.
__________________


Talk nerdy to me.
Pete Zicato is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2011, 09:26 AM   #7
Shawnee123
Why, you're a regular Alfred E Einstein, ain't ya?
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 21,206
Tin Eye? Tin Eye?

Braceface!
__________________
A word to the wise ain't necessary - it's the stupid ones who need the advice.
--Bill Cosby
Shawnee123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2011, 01:10 PM   #8
Clodfobble
UNDER CONDITIONAL MITIGATION
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 20,012
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete Zicato
The major issue is the fallacy of categorization. There isn't anything that fits in only one category.
Y'all are weird. I organize by the date the photo was taken, which is part of the filename. Each month gets a folder, and that folder is named by a descriptive list of what's inside, like "01-2011 - Snowballs, Grandma's house, D's Birthday, Birds."
Clodfobble is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2011, 01:15 PM   #9
glatt
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 27,717
Date is easiest by far. It's how we live our lives. We steadily march through time. Organizing your pictures this way tells a story.
glatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2011, 02:54 PM   #10
Pete Zicato
Turns out my CRS is a symptom of TMB.
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Chicago suburbs
Posts: 2,916
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clodfobble View Post
Y'all are weird. I organize by the date the photo was taken, which is part of the filename. Each month gets a folder, and that folder is named by a descriptive list of what's inside, like "01-2011 - Snowballs, Grandma's house, D's Birthday, Birds."
Right. That works. Until you have a photo of a snowball fight at Grandma's House on D's Birthday. And there were birds in the background. Now what?

I realize that this is an uncommon occurrence. But it is well to remember that the uncommon does occur from time to time.
__________________


Talk nerdy to me.
Pete Zicato is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2011, 03:06 PM   #11
Shawnee123
Why, you're a regular Alfred E Einstein, ain't ya?
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 21,206
Were the birds falling to the ground, dead?
__________________
A word to the wise ain't necessary - it's the stupid ones who need the advice.
--Bill Cosby
Shawnee123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2011, 03:13 PM   #12
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clodfobble View Post
Y'all are weird. I organize by the date the photo was taken, which is part of the filename. Each month gets a folder, and that folder is named by a descriptive list of what's inside, like "01-2011 - Snowballs, Grandma's house, D's Birthday, Birds."
Quote:
Originally Posted by glatt View Post
Date is easiest by far. It's how we live our lives. We steadily march through time. Organizing your pictures this way tells a story.
You're dealing with family snapshots, 3foot is a photographer. He's got all sorts of photos taken by him, and others, for reference, fun, and occasional profit. That's why he's dealing with 24k+.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2011, 05:16 PM   #13
Clodfobble
UNDER CONDITIONAL MITIGATION
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 20,012
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete Zicato
Until you have a photo of a snowball fight at Grandma's House on D's Birthday. And there were birds in the background. Now what?
Nothing changes. It still goes in the January of 2011 folder, and it's extra easy because the name of the folder doesn't even need anything appended to it.
Clodfobble is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2011, 10:17 AM   #14
Perry Winkle
Esnohplad Semaj Ton
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: A little south of sanity
Posts: 2,259
My wife uses Lightroom (I think) to organize her photos. It lets her tag (like a category/folder but many-to-many) and create sets of photos.

She's using it to put together a photo album DVD of our wedding pictures. It looks pretty slick to me.
Perry Winkle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2011, 10:17 AM   #15
Pete Zicato
Turns out my CRS is a symptom of TMB.
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Chicago suburbs
Posts: 2,916
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clodfobble View Post
Nothing changes. It still goes in the January of 2011 folder, and it's extra easy because the name of the folder doesn't even need anything appended to it.
I see. I read it too quick and thought you had subfolders.

Still falls into the fallacy of categorization, though. That's how I have ours set up as well, 'cause I think that's about the best you can do in practical terms. But when I went to make a slideshow of Zing1 for her graduation, I had to go through all the folders looking for pictures of her.
__________________


Talk nerdy to me.
Pete Zicato is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:21 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.