|
Home Base A starting point, and place for threads don't seem to belong anywhere else |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
12-06-2003, 05:10 PM | #1 |
no one of consequence
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 2,839
|
New World Monkey origins
Hey all! I thought I'd relate to you folks something I was telling a few Cellarites in chat the other day.
Today, there are monkeys living in Africa, Asia, and South America. Species that were ancestral to monkeys, however, are NOT found in any of the fossil deposits in South America. This is because South America was an island continent for most of the Cenozoic era (65 million years ago to present). This means that at some point in time, monkeys, who had been evolving in Africa for quite some time, just magically appeared in South America. In the Eocene (37 - 53 million years ago), which is about the time anthropologists think monkeys arrived in South America, the earth looked like this: This geography presents a problem to anthropologists. Since South America was an island when monkeys first appeared there, how in the bloody hell did they get there?? The current working theory is that they rafted there from Africa on floating masses of vegetation. Apparentely, huge chunks of vegetation actually do break off now and then and just float away. I don't know much about this, except that I'm told it's been documented to happen, and still happens today. If monkeys did raft to South America, they could have come from three places: North America, Africa, or Asia (through Antartica). Most anthropologists seem to think an African origin is most likely, based on the similarities of certain fossils. The ancient water currents would also have been favorable for an African origin. They could have also traveled from North America via Island-hopping. Lots of people seem to also be for this origin, but it seems unlikely because A) rafts of vegetation don't form on small islands, and B) the species in North America that NWMs would have evolved from are much farther down the evolutionary tree than the potential African ancestors. Another suggestion is that they came from Asia, rafted across to Antartica, and traveled via a land connection to South America. But since no primate ancestors have been discovered in Antartica, not many people are for this idea. When I told Whit and Slang about this, Slang asked about travel times. That's answered in this paper, which has the following chart: The linked PDF argues for an Antartic route, and it goes into much more depth about this stuff. So it's worth checking out if you're interested. Anyway, that's all I'll say on that for now. It's really fucked up, sounds compeletely ridiculous, and is only the current working theory because there are no other ideas. edit: According to the linked articlle, this theory is also used to explain to origins of South American acridian insects, West Indian Coleoptera, Lake Malawi fishes, many shallow-water animals, some amphibians and reptiles including Crocodilia, Crotalus rattlesnakes of Baja California, land reptiles of Western Samoa, South American indigenous gekkos, some land vertebrates of the Krakatau Islands, land mammals of the Mediterranean islands, South American caviomorph rodents, a group of Australian rodents, and possibly a group of South American sloths. Last edited by juju; 12-06-2003 at 05:20 PM. |
12-06-2003, 05:18 PM | #2 |
Professor
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Spring, Texas
Posts: 1,481
|
Interesting research juju. And to think is was a big deal when Gertrude Ederly swam the English Channel.
My own theory involves some monsterous tornado that picked up a breeding pair in Africa and deposited them in South America. Hey, could have happened. "Toto, I don't think were in the Congo anymore..." |
12-06-2003, 05:35 PM | #3 |
Radical Centrist
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cottage of Prussia
Posts: 31,423
|
What about other little islands?
|
12-06-2003, 05:39 PM | #4 |
still says videotape
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,813
|
I don't see that in here anywhere... which one are you reading, King James?
__________________
If you would only recognize that life is hard, things would be so much easier for you. - Louis D. Brandeis |
12-06-2003, 06:03 PM | #5 |
no one of consequence
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 2,839
|
What do you mean, UT?
|
12-06-2003, 08:01 PM | #6 |
Radical Centrist
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cottage of Prussia
Posts: 31,423
|
Well, the canary islands are kinda in the zone there, and if the continents were in different locations they could provide a mid-point for a for a few tens of thousands of years until it could make the final leap.
|
12-06-2003, 08:28 PM | #7 | |
I can hear my ears
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 25,571
|
Quote:
__________________
This body holding me reminds me of my own mortality Embrace this moment, remember We are eternal, all this pain is an illusion ~MJKeenan |
|
12-06-2003, 10:35 PM | #8 |
Paramour of Paradigm
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Conway, Arkansas
Posts: 42
|
Clearly they were brought over by the same aliens that later influenced the local architecture.
It all started when K'Thagon ran for office on a platform of "a monkey for every continent". |
12-06-2003, 11:03 PM | #9 | |
When Do I Get Virtual Unreality?
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Raytown, Missouri
Posts: 12,719
|
Quote:
__________________
"To those of you who are wearing ties, I think my dad would appreciate it if you took them off." - Robert Moog |
|
12-06-2003, 11:39 PM | #10 |
a real smartass
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 1,121
|
Well, maybe a team of swallows could carry a monkey!
-- I had not realized that Europe had ever been a continent in it's own right! Damn. Now I might have to stop ranting about Europe not being a continent .. and start ranting about how it should be treated as a subcontinent, like India! I also hadn't realized that Asia has been spinning! That would have been wonderful geography, though. Excellent shipping lanes by sea. Chicxulub seems quite evident in this picture, too. |
12-06-2003, 11:49 PM | #11 | |
no one of consequence
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 2,839
|
Quote:
According the linked article: "tropical large rivers and lakes with an access to the ocean are likely places of floating island growth, and these kinds of rivers and lakes are rarely found on small oceanic islands". So, it seems unlikely (though, so does this whole scenario). |
|
12-07-2003, 12:44 AM | #12 | |
no one of consequence
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 2,839
|
Quote:
I'm trying to find more details on the net, but failing. Still, it's really cool how one seemingly insignificant geographic thing can change the entire world. |
|
12-07-2003, 07:24 AM | #13 | |
The future is unwritten
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
|
Quote:
BTW- Tethys Sea closing up is an "insignificant geological thing"?
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump. Last edited by xoxoxoBruce; 12-07-2003 at 07:29 AM. |
|
12-07-2003, 08:17 AM | #14 | |
I think this line's mostly filler.
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: DC
Posts: 13,575
|
Quote:
__________________
_________________ |...............| We live in the nick of times. | Len 17, Wid 3 | |_______________| [pics] |
|
12-07-2003, 10:42 AM | #15 |
no one of consequence
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 2,839
|
Nah, I just meant that it seems insignificant, but of course it isn't.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|