|
Image of the Day Images that will blow your mind - every day. [Blog] [RSS] [XML] |
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
06-04-2003, 11:59 PM | #16 |
Theremin Master
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 73
|
Unless
Unless it's proving it to their buddies.
Faithfuler than thou! |
06-15-2003, 09:02 PM | #17 |
Resident-in-Training
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 7
|
<i>I've always heard the term "whirling dervish" and never understood it.</i>
And you still don't. Sufism/dervishes and this picture are totally unrelated. <i>It turns out that "dervish" is a Muslim sect especially in Turkey and Iran/Iraq. It's a fanatical sect (of Islam? surprise), a branch of the Sufi Islam which seems to be a bit more peaceful than the others (not a reach). </i> Sheer idiocy on your part. "Dervish" is not a sect, it is simply a word meaning "student". Instead of showing the world what a moron you are, you might consider consulting an encylopedia once in a while. The sufis are not a sect either; sufism is simply a spiritual dimension of mainstream Islam. To say sufism is fanatical is like saying 'psychology is a cucumber'. If you would like to learn about American sufi practioners (including the real Whirling Dervishes), check out http://www.sufism.org Anyhow, I just have to point out for those that don't know: You are really, really dumb. Really. You remind me of Cliff Claven from Cheers-- making up things as you go along, in a futile attempt to look like you know something. Last edited by rumi; 06-15-2003 at 09:06 PM. |
06-15-2003, 09:55 PM | #18 |
Radical Centrist
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cottage of Prussia
Posts: 31,423
|
That's fine -- my info, in this case, came from the official caption, probably written by the AP. And they are often a little confused.
|
06-15-2003, 10:19 PM | #19 |
The future is unwritten
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
|
I was under the impression the Muslims followed the teachings of Mohammed and the Koran. Who gave this M.J. Rumi the authority to tell people how to go about following Mohammed's teachings. Is he like the "pope" of Islam? Or in the catagory of Ghandi?
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump. |
06-16-2003, 06:16 AM | #20 | |
Resident-in-Training
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 7
|
Quote:
|
|
06-16-2003, 09:04 AM | #21 |
The future is unwritten
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
|
The problem with scholars is it comes from schoolers. As any student can tell you, the only way to successfully graduate is to agree with the teacher. Then, when the student becomes the teacher, the same ideas are carried on. When a scholar develops an independent line of thought, he can lobby his peers to accept it. But, it seems in Islam, anyone with independent thought is branded a heretic and killed.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump. |
06-16-2003, 01:38 PM | #22 | |
no one of consequence
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 2,839
|
Quote:
Simply not knowing much about an obscure subject only makes you ignorant of that subject. It doesn't make you a moron. And since no one can know everything about everything, there's absolutely nothing wrong with that. He's at least shown an interest in the subject, I'd think that would count for something. Like I said, you're being an asshole, and you're exploiting your knowledge to do it. I think that's disgusting. |
|
06-16-2003, 02:11 PM | #23 | |
Junior Master Dwellar
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Kingdom of Atlantia
Posts: 2,979
|
Quote:
One can be educated without being belittled. If anything, the person doing the belittling is ignored just for that reason. If you want to have a discussion on a topic and get your opinion across, it's not very effective to alienate your audience.
__________________
Impotentes defendere libertatem non possunt. "Repetition does not transform a lie into a truth." ~Franklin D. Roosevelt |
|
06-16-2003, 02:22 PM | #24 |
Radical Centrist
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cottage of Prussia
Posts: 31,423
|
I didn't take rumi's advice and look it up in an encyclopedia. I looked it up in the dictionary. Just now.
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=dervish For the record then, all of the definitions given: <li>A member of any of various Muslim ascetic orders, some of which perform whirling dances and vigorous chanting as acts of ecstatic devotion. <li>One that possesses abundant, often frenzied energy. <li>Word History: The word dervish calls to mind the phrases howling dervish and whirling dervish. Certainly there are dervishes whose religious exercises include making loud howling noises or whirling rapidly to induce a dizzy, mystical state. But a dervish is really the Muslim equivalent of a monk or friar, for the Persian word darvsh, the ultimate source of dervish, means “religious mendicant.” The word is first recorded in English in 1585. <li>One of the fanatical followers of the Mahdi, in the Sudan. <li>A Turkish or Persian monk, especially one who professes extreme poverty and leads an austere life. <li>An ascetic Muslim monk; a member of an order noted for devotional exercises involving bodily movements So there it is, and rumi, oh dear, none of them mention the word "student". I won't rub it in too hard though, because I'm a nice guy. |
06-16-2003, 04:40 PM | #25 | |
The future is unwritten
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
|
Quote:
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump. |
|
06-16-2003, 04:59 PM | #26 |
Resident-in-Training
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 7
|
Dervishes are not a sect. They are student initiates in sufi orders. Sufism is not a sect either; they are brotherhoods/sisterhoods that Muslims (and occasionally some Christians and Jews) belong to. The definitions you cite are at best incomplete. The fellow in the photograph is more likely a circus performer than a sufi dervish.
I am very pleased, however, to see that you're taking the time to learn more. Keep it up, and I'm sure we'll see less inaccurate/xenophobic statements from you. If you really want to understand what it means to be a dervish, check out the aforementioned http://www.sufism.org and http://www.uga.edu/islam/ (written by U of Georgia professors). It's fascinating stuff. The latter is an incredible source of information, from an American perspective. |
06-16-2003, 05:26 PM | #27 |
lurkin old school
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,796
|
Well thanks for the links. Seems the basic difference with the Sufi's is they encourage letting your freak flag fly to find god. This pisses off the rest of Islam, particularly those scholars that have secured the ability to get the straight scoop over the rest of the gang. I'll keep trying to learn.
|
06-16-2003, 06:16 PM | #28 | |
Resident Denizen
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Peterborough, UK
Posts: 60
|
Quote:
__________________
"I am after all," said Pooh, "a bear of little brain." - A.A. Milne |
|
06-16-2003, 06:17 PM | #29 | |
Resident-in-Training
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 7
|
Quote:
The mainstream scholars who accept sufi practices certainly aren't encouraging people let their 'freak flag fly to find God'. They strive to integrate the letter and the spirt of the law. You could say that the wahhabis focus only on the letter, while new age people focus only on the spirit. Well, just keep on reading, the links will explain better than I can in this short space. |
|
06-16-2003, 06:17 PM | #30 |
Radical Centrist
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cottage of Prussia
Posts: 31,423
|
rumi, my user title used to be "sometimes wrong", until people made me change it because they got tired of looking at it.
I imagine I'm dead wrong about 20% of the time and somewhat incorrect another 20% of the time. But I can't tell the difference between the things I'm wrong about and the things I'm right about, because everything I write and say comes out of my own perspective, with imperfections all around. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|