Respond to the Dwellar three hundred and twenty seven posts below

[footfootfoot]

This is an automatically generated post, please do not respond to this post. Please respond the the post 327 posts below this one. (i.e. #328)

Please consider the environment before printing out this thread.

[monster]

Bullshit, you are a bully and there you go again swanning into a thread and calling people festering cauliflowers when they've done absolutely nothing to offend you apart from sleeping with your gonorhea-dripping mother and posting the pics in the dwellar RFN thread without NSFW tags. You just can't keep things in context can you? And now you're responsible for long-term-valued member thinking-thurma leaving the forum for 5 minutes in a fit of apathy

[Pico and ME]

Goddamn.

[infinite monkey]

Six days do not a week make!

[footfootfoot]

You invoked Godwin's law after seven posts and you are calling me a hypocrite?

[Undertoad]

Aw... I appreciate that. I love you too.

[Nirvana]

And while you're at it, who raised those kids with their lack of standards and behavior?

[infinite monkey]

It has been duly researched and noted that the conspiracy theory perpetuated by the aforementioned Rag and Muffin Party has been thought to be believed to be an actual absturbation of the affective diagnosis of the hammerstein. Furthermore, no one in attendance actually saw the perp, though all were present and legally sighted. Therefore it is only presumptuous and appropriate to assume that all misgivings given to the Thanksgiving day of the second eve of the twelfth were unfortunately purposely apprehended for the fate of the final sixteen who were to have plundered forward in their assignation.

Cite? Fuck YOU. Google it!

[footfootfoot]

While I love an NSFW post as much as the next dwellar, there is a thread for that.

[DanaC]

Originally Posted by monster

Bullshit, you are a bully and there you go again swanning into a thread and calling people festering cauliflowers when they've done absolutely nothing to offend you apart from sleeping with your gonorhea-dripping mother and posting the pics in the dwellar RFN thread without NSFW tags. You just can't keep things in context can you? And now you're responsible for long-term-valued member thinking-thurma leaving the forum for 5 minutes in a fit of apathy

In fairness though, thinking-thurma did ButtFuck him in the mouth first.

[Undertoad]

Respond to the Dwellar three hundred and twenty seven posts below

You people here in posts #336, #334 and #333 are forgetting what we reminded Dana, classic, and infin, way back when the thread was started. Don't be all responding to the post 2 above. Respond to the post 327 below.

[footfootfoot]

Originally Posted by classicman

Link

Originally Posted by DanaC

In fairness though, thinking-thurma did ButtFuck him in the mouth first.

Originally Posted by footfootfoot

Please respond the the post 327 posts below this one. (i.e. #328)

FAIL

[infinite monkey]

Science simply does not support that statement.

[SamIam]

Well, I was too lazy to count down 327 posts from the OP, but I did count down 327 threads, and here it is:

Originally Posted by XOXOBruce

The Truth About Cats & Dogs
Well maybe. At least the truth as one reporter has ascertained.
Quote:
Cat people really are different from dog people, it turns out, according to a study that really was conducted and, presumably, really did receive some kind of funding. Specifically: dog people are more extrovert and agreeable; cat people are more neurotic, but also more open to new experiences. As a cat person, though currently petless, I accept that trade-off.

~~~~~~~~

Restricting the discussion to pet-keeping, however, you might imagine things would be clearer – everyone knows pets make us happier and healthier. Who'd argue with that? Well, a fair few anthrozoologists, in fact. (Which is rather awkward and irritating of them. They must be cat people.) Herzog notes that pet ownership has been shown to correlate with better survival in coronary patients and lower levels of depression among the elderly; then again, a Warwick University study found no effect on loneliness in adults, while a Finnish one found pet owners got less exercise and were more susceptible to kidney disease, arthritis and more. Studies of "therapy animals" are similarly ambiguous: dogs seem to bring psychological benefits, dolphins don't.

~~~~~~~~~

Yet to say that our relationships with pets are all in our heads isn't necessarily to denigrate them. Isn't the same true, ultimately, about our relationships with humans, too? There's even an argument that animals' lack of language enriches the interaction, freeing it from the complexities and confusion of thought, leaving only wordless clarity. As the spiritual teacher Eckhart Tolle puts it: "I have lived with several Zen masters – all of them cats."

As a cat person, I feel a severe attack of neurosis coming on, merely from having to go to all the trouble of counting back 327 threads. But I WAS open to the experience!

OK, next contestant!

[DanaC]

Right. I am fucking confused.