The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Technology
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Technology Computing, programming, science, electronics, telecommunications, etc.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-09-2011, 06:01 PM   #136
glatt
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 27,717
Grr. Someone clipped the front driver's side corner of our car today. It was parked on the street near the elementary school and they were pulling in front of it to park. It looks like we'll need a small dent hammered out of the fender, a new light housing, and a new front bumper.

Fortuneately, they left a note on the windshield. It's even someone we know.

And the really good news is that we need to get it inspected this month, and Mrs. Glatt had just inspected it a couple hours earlier. So there won't be a rush to get it fixed AND inspected before the end of the month.
glatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2011, 06:28 PM   #137
Undertoad
Radical Centrist
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cottage of Prussia
Posts: 31,423
Quote:
Originally Posted by ehow page
Resetting the check engine light will not allow the MPV to sneak through state inspections that require emissions testing; even if not illuminated on the dash. The inspection and maintenance monitors (IM monitors) will not be reset and most all onboard computers hooked to the DLC will be able to detect that the powertrain control module is not "ready." As a result, the vehicle will fail emissions testing until the powertrain control module is in its "ready" mode, and, once it is, if the repair hasn't been made, it will retrigger the DLC and the vehicle will still fail.
Fuckin Christ
Undertoad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2011, 06:42 PM   #138
Clodfobble
UNDER CONDITIONAL MITIGATION
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 20,012
Yeah, assuming that it really truly is a failing emissions level triggering the light, and not a poor gas mixture like Lamplighter suggested. If it's a gas mixture problem, turning off the light may allow it to stay off, or it may come back on again and then I'll know for sure.
Clodfobble is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2011, 06:49 PM   #139
Clodfobble
UNDER CONDITIONAL MITIGATION
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 20,012
Mr. Clod and I were calculating, how many "expired inspection" tickets I would have to be pulled over for before it became worth the cost of a new catalytic converter... it's a lot of tickets.
Clodfobble is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2011, 06:52 PM   #140
ZenGum
Doctor Wtf
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Badelaide, Baustralia
Posts: 12,861
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clodfobble View Post
Fuck. Check engine light is on. Got the codes read at AutoZone, they say:

P0421 - Warm up catalyst system (RH) efficiency below threshold
P0431 - Warm up catalyst system (LH) efficiency below threshold
P0174 - Lean Air/Fuel ratio bank 2

I know it will not pass inspection with this issue. But I just passed in November, so I'm safe there for 11 more months. My question is, is this a dangerous thing to be driving around with, or can it hang out for a few months with no real problems other than continuing to degrade a catalytic converter that is probably going to need replacement either way? I have to drive this thing for about 10 hours of holiday travel in just a couple weeks, and fixing it right now is going to be very painful.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clodfobble View Post
Yeah, assuming that it really truly is a failing emissions level triggering the light, and not a poor gas mixture like Lamplighter suggested. If it's a gas mixture problem, turning off the light may allow it to stay off, or it may come back on again and then I'll know for sure.
Just pulling stuff out of my ear here but ...
The fact that both LH and RH (left hand and right hand?) catalysts are showing errors at the same time suggests either:
a. These catalysts are shitty and have a poor lifespan built in or
b. The catalysts are fine and the problem is caused by some factor shared between them, most likely the gas you are using.

B. Let it be b.

ETA: or c. the catalysts were fine but have been irreversibly cocked up by using shitty gas. Hope not.
__________________
Shut up and hug. MoreThanPretty, Nov 5, 2008.
Just because I'm nominally polite, does not make me a pussy. Sundae Girl.
ZenGum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2011, 08:46 PM   #141
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
You've got the cats, and some sensors (usually oxygen sensors) to report back to the computers how the cats are performing. A bad report could be a failure of either.

Only after you're sure of what the problem actually is, then explore your options
Here's a couple out of a list of 76.
Attached Images
   
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2011, 09:30 PM   #142
tw
Read? I only know how to write.
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clodfobble View Post
Yeah, assuming that it really truly is a failing emissions level triggering the light, and not a poor gas mixture like Lamplighter suggested.
The combination of codes imply a least expensive suspect. To say more requires information you cannot obtain.

Appreciate what you have and what is relevant. Oxygen sensors do nothing until the engine heats them to maybe 600 degrees. During a warm up period, the engine dumps larger amounts of gasoline into the engine. Much unburned gas is then burned by the catalytic converter when it gets hot.

Once the oxygen sensors get warm, then the engine computer changes a fuel input. Leans out the mixture based, in part, on data from an oxygen sensor.

Apparently you have two sensors. If one is proving bad data, then the engine will dump improper amounts of fuel into the engine. This can result either in a too lean mixture (causing exhaust valve failure) or too rich (causing catalytic converter failure).

A most likely suspect is a bad oxygen sensor. Fix it now to avert damage that may cost $thousands.

Bad gasoline causing this problem would be noted by mileage changes approaching maybe ten percent. Of the maybe 100 other possible errors associate with the converter, gasoline might only explain less than ten.

This failure could be something as simple as an oxygen sensor with a failed heater. Then the engine computer, after a delay, would be expecting data that was incorrect. Or it could be a thermal junction failure inside that sensor. Either way, a $100+ sensor is a least expensive solution. I believe you have two. Don't know if the shop will want to replace both or just one.

Again, your reply is only as useful as facts first provided. You (typically) cannot obtain numbers necessary for a better answer. The shop can.
tw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2011, 09:40 PM   #143
Clodfobble
UNDER CONDITIONAL MITIGATION
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 20,012
But in that case, wouldn't the presence of both (LH) and (RH) codes mean that both oxygen sensors had to fail at almost exactly the same time?
Clodfobble is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2011, 08:08 PM   #144
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
Your cats are covered by a 8 yr /128,000 km waranty, has that expired?
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2011, 09:34 PM   #145
Clodfobble
UNDER CONDITIONAL MITIGATION
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 20,012
Yeah, it was eight years old this past January, and has almost twice that mileage. But I've decided I can afford the diagnostic, and if they tell me I need new catalytic converters, I'll just tell them no and start figuring out how to wreck the thing for an insurance payout.
Clodfobble is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2011, 10:34 PM   #146
plthijinx
Master Dwellar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,197
i talked with a friend of mine about this. we came to the same conclusion. if the "good" gas doesn't solve your problem, replace both of the o2 sensors at the cat first. then if you still get the codes, you have a bad cat.
__________________
For your dreams to come true, you must first have a dream.
plthijinx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2011, 10:37 PM   #147
zippyt
LONG LIVE KING ZIPPY! per Feetz
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 7,661
BAAAAD KITTY !!!!
__________________
"Success is getting what you want. Happiness is wanting what you get. "
Brother Dave Gardner
zippyt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2011, 08:41 AM   #148
busterb
NSABFD
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: MS. usa
Posts: 3,908
Might be something here http://www.ifixit.com/Browse/Vehicle
__________________
I've haven't left very deep footprints in the sands of time. But, boy I've left a bunch.
busterb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2011, 04:50 PM   #149
tw
Read? I only know how to write.
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clodfobble View Post
... and if they tell me I need new catalytic converters, I'll just tell them no and start figuring out how to wreck the thing for an insurance payout.
If you need new converters, then an engine defect caused premature converter failure.

I mentioned two oxygen sensors. One before the converter and one after. Many cars do not use a sensor after the converter. But all must have the sensor before. Why would an engine problem cause its computer to detect those errors? A first sensor is giving bad numbers. Engine responds with a bad fuel to air ratio. Then a sensor after the converter reads bad numbers.

You don't know what to replace. This is just one likely suggestion. A likely suspect is one oxygen sensor causing bad numbers or improper engine operation. I see no reason to jump to a bad catalytic converter conclusion. Follow the evidence before fixing anything. The above scenario describes one possible reason for those codes.
tw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2011, 05:01 PM   #150
Clodfobble
UNDER CONDITIONAL MITIGATION
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 20,012
Quote:
Originally Posted by tw
Follow the evidence before fixing anything.
Is the evidence a trail of money? Because I could follow that, and then fix anything.
Clodfobble is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:39 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.