|
Current Events Help understand the world by talking about things happening in it |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
05-08-2005, 06:14 PM | #16 |
halve your cake and eat it too.
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Georgia.. by way of Lawrence Kansas
Posts: 1,359
|
I'm all for it, the reason I ever found this place is from someones blog, and honestly the major media need a serious shake up.. being spoonfed information from ' official sources' has always made me wince. there is a point to a free press, and near as I can tell it's for a disemination of information so that people can make their own decisions on the subject matter... then again I am an idealist
__________________
no my child.. this is not my desire..I'm digging for fire. |
05-08-2005, 07:48 PM | #17 | |
-◊|≡·∙■·∙≡|◊-
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Parts unknown.
Posts: 4,081
|
Quote:
__________________
♠ ♥ ♣ ♦ |
|
05-09-2005, 03:39 AM | #18 |
whig
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 5,075
|
Yes, and blogs aren't any different.
__________________
Good friends, good books and a sleepy conscience: this is the ideal life. - Twain |
05-09-2005, 06:43 AM | #19 |
Radical Centrist
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cottage of Prussia
Posts: 31,423
|
Every successful blog puts its agenda on its sleeve.
|
05-09-2005, 07:42 AM | #20 |
whig
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 5,075
|
Which is what makes them such a good example of the biggest problem with this kind of 'new media', it makes it too easy to reinforce their own ignorance and prejudices and insulate themselves from anything that might challenge that. Little Green Footballs, Free Republic & Common Dreams being prime examples. The value of media that at least attempts to be objective cannot be overestimated, as more and more people turn to these 'sources' for their news the more partisan they get making common ground harder and harder to find as the misinformation and ignorance grows. It's one reason I've always felt so strongly about media-ownership laws.
__________________
Good friends, good books and a sleepy conscience: this is the ideal life. - Twain |
05-09-2005, 08:45 AM | #21 |
Radical Centrist
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cottage of Prussia
Posts: 31,423
|
And yet this country's experience with media ownership laws, which existed here for many decades and were strictly enforced, is that they produced a system in which 90% of journalists are self-described Democrats (there's your monoculture) and where CBS News could not admit to the truth when it leaped up and bit them straight on the ass.
Everyone has biases. The reason blogs are popular is that this is finally admitted flat-out, after which it's suddenly possible to have real conversations. Blogs convert news into conversations. I've found that the different edges produce their share of truths, and if you read all sides you can determine what's really happening with a clearer narrative than before. LGF versus Daily Kos, both produce great information after you take their bias into account, followed by lousy monoculture conversations. (Our conversations here are better, because we have different agendas; this is the strength of the Cellar, because some of us think others of us are asses and that's what it is in real life!) |
05-09-2005, 10:02 AM | #22 | |
changed his status to single
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Right behind you. No, the other side.
Posts: 10,308
|
Quote:
i would much rather read some of the larger blogs where i know EXACTLY what their agenda is - read their stories, filter out the agenda and compare to some other sources of info. chances are that i will probably get a clearer understanding of the situation than if i'd listened to only the mainline media.
__________________
Getting knocked down is no sin, it's not getting back up that's the sin |
|
05-09-2005, 10:29 AM | #23 |
-◊|≡·∙■·∙≡|◊-
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Parts unknown.
Posts: 4,081
|
I also think that big media got away with it for so long because they had no challengers. And with no credible dissenting views to contend with, big media had no incentive to shoot straight.
The minute a challenger with the same distribution power as big media cropped up, big media began to implode. Dan Rather is the poster boy for this phenomenon. But for the bloggers, he'd still be shovelling the same old liberal manure onto America's plate. And CNN can't get enough of the runaway bride. Hell, even the National Enquirer has moved on.
__________________
♠ ♥ ♣ ♦ |
05-09-2005, 10:45 AM | #24 | |
to live and die in LA
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,090
|
Quote:
A bit of an exageration, I know, but the principle holds. They don't merely intend to be balanced, they beleive that they ARE balanced, and they can't figure out where Fox News' 50 bajillion viewers are coming from.
__________________
to live and die in LA |
|
05-09-2005, 10:57 AM | #25 | |
whig
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 5,075
|
Quote:
I think good media either has far more subtle or a greater tendancy to report both sides of the story. Of course the US media is probably the worst in the free world (along with Italy) for this so YYMV. Here we have both ends of the spectrum from News of The World that usually leads with a celeb scandal to The Independant that I've seen accused of being both left and right wing, usually a good sign that the paper is doing a good job. I should clarify that while I think good media tries to be unbiased, I don't think The Guardian or CNN or Fox really are in this category but there are still papers that (gosh!) when a major issues comes up publish one editorial for each side. Then there's traditional papers that have a public bias but a very high quality of reporting such as The Economist which covers a lot of issues that otherwise don't get airtime, they have a strong bent but it's clear and easy to read though. Ever wonder why most journos were left leaning? Food for thought.
__________________
Good friends, good books and a sleepy conscience: this is the ideal life. - Twain |
|
05-09-2005, 11:43 AM | #26 | |
-◊|≡·∙■·∙≡|◊-
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Parts unknown.
Posts: 4,081
|
Quote:
Before anybody decides to debate the point that colleges and universities are almost 90 liberal or democratic, the Washington Post removed all doubt about that with an intensive study of the higher education system across the country and proclaimed liberal domination of the system to be a verified fact. I don't have a link but I'm sure its googleable.
__________________
♠ ♥ ♣ ♦ |
|
05-09-2005, 11:59 AM | #27 | |
changed his status to single
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Right behind you. No, the other side.
Posts: 10,308
|
Quote:
he asked me about the other 10%. i explained that those are the professors who did something in the real world before they entered academia. they understand the difference between "theory" and "reality".
__________________
Getting knocked down is no sin, it's not getting back up that's the sin |
|
05-09-2005, 12:07 PM | #28 |
whig
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 5,075
|
That hardly applies to journos lookout. Beestie, I've got quite a few friends who studied or are studying journalism, that isn't the case. As for academics, yes and no, depends on the field as much as anything.
__________________
Good friends, good books and a sleepy conscience: this is the ideal life. - Twain |
05-09-2005, 12:17 PM | #29 |
I think this line's mostly filler.
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: DC
Posts: 13,575
|
The divide is between fields where thinking and communicating are ends in themselves, and fields where thinking and communicating are a way to get money. So journalists and professors are Democrats, and media owners and executives are Republicans. A gross simplification, but so is everything else here.
__________________
_________________ |...............| We live in the nick of times. | Len 17, Wid 3 | |_______________| [pics] |
05-09-2005, 03:50 PM | #30 |
The future is unwritten
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
|
Reading the blogs and filtering the agendas out is a great way to find the real story unless you have to work for a living and can't devote half the day to it.
OK, you put in the time and effort to find the nugget of truth....now what? What are you going to do about it besides sit smugly at your PC(or apple) and feel proud of yourself for finding the truth (that may not be)? Does this make you better than the people that grab on to cause they feel strongly about (opinions may vary) and go out to change the world?
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|