|
Image of the Day Images that will blow your mind - every day. [Blog] [RSS] [XML] |
|
Thread Tools | Rating: | Display Modes |
01-13-2006, 12:25 PM | #16 | |
bent
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: under the weather
Posts: 2,656
|
Quote:
Schadenfreud. It's what's for dinner. Course, I guess digital is an option.
__________________
Sìn a nall na cuaranan sin. -- Cha mhór is fheairrde thu iad, tha iad coltach ri cat air a dhathadh |
|
01-13-2006, 01:44 PM | #17 | |
™
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 27,717
|
Quote:
Now if they would just make a digital SLR that would take my old manual focus Nikon lenses. The Nikon D50 looks promising, but the exposure won't work with my old lenses. I hate having several hundred dollars worth of optics just sitting on the shelf in my closet. Come on Nikon! |
|
01-13-2006, 10:39 PM | #18 |
The future is unwritten
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
|
I'm with you there. Many $k in Nikkor lenses gathering dust.
For me it wasn’t the film but the difficulty and inconvenience of developing and QUALITY printing. Of course it’s hard to beat the convenience of resizing and emailing without having to write a literate letter to accompany them.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump. |
01-16-2006, 11:12 PM | #19 | |
Recruit or Something
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Alabama
Posts: 4
|
Quote:
However, the D200 is much more expensive that the D50 ($1700 vs. ~$600), so unless you have lots of money invested in lenses, it's not really worth it to get a D200 just for this feature. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|