The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-05-2008, 01:44 PM   #1
lumberjim
I can hear my ears
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 25,571
who is this 'wolf' person......they seem familiar somehow.
__________________
This body holding me reminds me of my own mortality
Embrace this moment, remember
We are eternal, all this pain is an illusion ~MJKeenan
lumberjim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2008, 08:18 PM   #2
flaja
High Propagandist
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 112
If she only suspends her campaign, then she will still have her pledged delegates when the convention starts. This means that she could still make a fight for the superdelegates and make a play for the nomination.

I expect the Clintons to drag up everything and anything that can slime Obama between now and the convention in an effort to make Obama un-electable by November.
flaja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2008, 10:55 PM   #3
Clodfobble
UNDER CONDITIONAL MITIGATION
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 20,012
No, at this point he has enough pledged delegates that mathematically it wouldn't matter even if she got the support of every single superdelegate.
Clodfobble is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2008, 09:45 AM   #4
smoothmoniker
to live and die in LA
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,090
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clodfobble View Post
No, at this point he has enough pledged delegates that mathematically it wouldn't matter even if she got the support of every single superdelegate.
Not true. He has 1763 pledged delegates, you need a total of 2118 to win. He has enough pledged + declared superdelegates to win.

Hillary can still get some of his declared supers to switch sides, and walk away with the nomination. She would need 192 additional superdelegates to vote for her.

Are there 192 open seats on the Supreme Court?
__________________
to live and die in LA
smoothmoniker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2008, 08:30 PM   #5
flaja
High Propagandist
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 112
Quote:
Originally Posted by smoothmoniker View Post
Not true. He has 1763 pledged delegates, you need a total of 2118 to win. He has enough pledged + declared superdelegates to win.

Hillary can still get some of his declared supers to switch sides, and walk away with the nomination. She would need 192 additional superdelegates to vote for her.

Are there 192 open seats on the Supreme Court?
Hasn't Clinton already tried to make the case that even the pledged delegates are not legally-bound to vote for the candidate that they were elected to support?

And what happens if Obama is sidelined by scandal between now and August?

I am not a Democrat. I have never been a Democrat, and I will never be or vote for a Democrat. But I hope that Clinton still makes an issue of the Florida and Michigan delegates. According to the Florida state constitution, the state legislature can regulate political parties. I question the validity of this under the U.S. Constitution since it restricts our right to assemble and petition the government for redress of grievances. But if state law can regulate national political parties, then I don’t see how party rules can dictate when state law says a party can have its primary. However, if party rules can override statutory law, then the parties should be paying the cost of holding the primary elections. As it stands now the state of Florida will only pay the cost of holding a primary election for the Democrats and Republicans- third parties must foot their own bill. This is fundamentally wrong and I hope that a challenge from Clinton can bring public attention to this issue.
flaja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2008, 01:10 AM   #6
Urbane Guerrilla
Person who doesn't update the user title
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 6,674
George Will and the Fox newsies basically are saying that taking Hillary on as Veep will make Obama unelectable. Bonnie Erbe, of the Boston Globe and not exactly a rock-ribbed conservative, writes ". . .for her to campaign for that spot is nothing short of unseemly. And that goes double for her husband. Yet, "campaigning" for it is exactly what some of her supporters, including Big-Mouth Bill, are doing."

For the Dems to try an Obama-Clinton slate would be... more stupid than I'd believe, and that's saying something.
__________________
Wanna stop school shootings? End Gun-Free Zones, of course.
Urbane Guerrilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2008, 03:19 AM   #7
Urbane Guerrilla
Person who doesn't update the user title
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 6,674
Bruce, you know I don't take crap advice, or ill-founded remarks, at all seriously.

If I did, I'd agree with tw about politics a lot more. Or radar.

Now my golden, wonderful, excellent advice is for you to blow away the fog that blinds you.
__________________
Wanna stop school shootings? End Gun-Free Zones, of course.
Urbane Guerrilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2008, 09:33 AM   #8
classicman
barely disguised asshole, keeper of all that is holy.
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce View Post
Can you say, delusional?
Yup and I can read it too.
__________________
"like strapping a pillow on a bull in a china shop" Bullitt
classicman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2008, 10:16 AM   #9
Clodfobble
UNDER CONDITIONAL MITIGATION
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 20,012
Ah, my mistake.
Clodfobble is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2008, 11:58 PM   #10
Urbane Guerrilla
Person who doesn't update the user title
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 6,674
What Peggy Noonan Had To Say On It.

Exerpted from her June 6 column:

Quote:
But this I believe is the truth: America dodged a bullet. That was the other meaning of the culminating events of this week.

Mrs. Clinton would have been a disaster as president. Mr. Obama may prove a disaster, and John McCain may, but she would be. Mr. Obama may lie, and Mr. McCain may lie, but she would lie. And she would have brought the whole rattling caravan of Clintonism with her—the scandal-making that is compulsive, the drama that is unending, the sheer, daily madness that is her, and him.

We have been spared this. Those who did it deserve to be thanked. May I rise in a toast to the Democratic Party.
__________________
Wanna stop school shootings? End Gun-Free Zones, of course.
Urbane Guerrilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2008, 05:43 PM   #11
TheMercenary
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
__________________
Anyone but the this most fuked up President in History in 2012!
TheMercenary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2008, 06:12 PM   #12
Sundae
polaroid of perfection
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 24,185
I'm intrigued that you see fascists everywhere UG. Left, right, pacifists, liberals, gun-control, vegetarins, nuns (okay I made the last two up)
Methinks you doth protest too much.
__________________
Life's hard you know, so strike a pose on a Cadillac
Sundae is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2008, 12:32 AM   #13
Urbane Guerrilla
Person who doesn't update the user title
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 6,674
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sundae Girl View Post
I'm intrigued that you see fascists everywhere UG. Left, right, pacifists, liberals, gun-control, vegetarins, nuns (okay I made the last two up)
Methinks you doth protest too much.
I could gripe about your grammar, but I'll just let you go study it. The KJV does use correct grammar, btw.

Fascists, communists -- not only would I hate to have to live on the difference, you'd hate to too. One will do for the other in all but the most minute policy details, and it ends up being more a difference of style than of substance.

Pacifists are not in my experience fascists. But the poor wretches can't rescue anybody from them -- not and remain pacifists. They're better neighbors than fascists are -- and utterly useless at quelling a riot. That's bad if you don't want your roofs given to the flame and your flesh to the eagles.

Gun control is of course a great help to fascists or their inspiration the communists. This alone is reason to reject it.

I'd rather digest vegetarian dishes than vegetarian, uh, philosophy. Our teeth and our tracts declare us omnivorous.
__________________
Wanna stop school shootings? End Gun-Free Zones, of course.
Urbane Guerrilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2008, 03:19 PM   #14
Griff
still says videotape
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,813
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sundae Girl View Post
I'm intrigued that you see fascists everywhere UG. Left, right, pacifists, liberals, gun-control, vegetarins, nuns (okay I made the last two up)
Methinks you doth protest too much.
To be fair, unless he changed tone since he qualified for ignore, he doesn't find fascists among the hard right ultra-nationalists.
__________________
If you would only recognize that life is hard, things would be so much easier for you.
- Louis D. Brandeis
Griff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2008, 06:17 PM   #15
TheMercenary
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
vegetarians make great lovers. Except they refuse to shave their bush and that is a bit of a problem.
__________________
Anyone but the this most fuked up President in History in 2012!
TheMercenary is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:55 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.