Evolutionary Science-v- Creationism - Page 25

jaguar · 02-10-2005, 03:43 AM

someone forgot their pills today.

Brown Thrasher · 02-10-2005, 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by garnet

Have you ever had C02 poisoning?

nO NOT tHAT i'M AWARE OF. hAVE YOU EVER HAD LEAD POIsONING?

lookout123 · 02-10-2005, 02:16 PM

wow, i haven't popped into this thread in awhile. looks like i wasn't missing much... just mediocre trolling.

OnyxCougar · 02-11-2005, 05:14 AM

Yeah, it's pretty much been trashed.

mrnoodle · 02-15-2005, 04:07 PM

Actually, it might be a useful case study for the thread. Did that evolve, or was it created by too much meth?

Brown Thrasher · 02-16-2005, 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Undertoad

100% certainty is one of the worst errors you can commit.

That is the most intellegent comment I have heard on this post!!!!!!!

Happy Monkey · 02-16-2005, 05:31 PM

Are you sure?

Brown Thrasher · 02-16-2005, 06:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Happy Monkey

Evolution says nothing about the reason for life. That's a subject for philosophy, not science.

I may be wrong, but I thought this was a philosophy site. If this discussion is not based on philosophical thought, why not move it to a better suited scientific site. However, living in the 21st century, we cannot prove DNA 100% accurate, so why the argument on such a subjective subject?

Happy Monkey · 02-16-2005, 06:48 PM

You or I can say what we like about the reason for life. Evolution, being science, can not. It can only describe the mechanism, not the reason.

Brown Thrasher · 02-16-2005, 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Happy Monkey

You or I can say what we like about the reason for life. Evolution, being science, can not. It can only describe the mechanism, not the reason.

Again, I did not think this was a scienctific site. However I guess a creationist would say the origin of life was to make a man in god's image. Maybe he was bored I don't know.... Evolution on the other hand, which has been argued now on over 360 post is a scientific theory. Creationist believe in the fundamentalism of the christian doctrine, where evolutionst believe in many different theories of the origin of life. Who cares???? When something is proven without a doubt concerning this topic, I will assure my undivided attention. Until then, let the sun shine in........

Happy Monkey · 02-16-2005, 10:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brown Thrasher

Again, I did not think this was a scienctific site.

This is a discussion site. All topics are valid.

tw · 02-17-2005, 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brown Thrasher

I may be wrong, but I thought this was a philosophy site. If this discussion is not based on philosophical thought, why not move it to a better suited scientific site.

Religion is only a science that became so introverted as to not advance itself. And that is the overall philosophy.

Did I miss any important buzz words?

Brown Thrasher · 02-17-2005, 06:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tw

Religion is only a science that became so introverted as to not advance itself. And that is the overall philosophy.

Did I miss any important buzz words?

Pretty strong words. "When a speculative philosopher believes he has comprehended the world once and for all in his system, he is deceiving himself, he has merely comprehended himself and then naively projected that view upon the world." C.G. Jung
I can't believe that statement about religion being so intoverted as to not advance itself. I am neither religious nor atheisis. I consider myself agnostic.
However, the argument you presented is of shallow thought in my opinion.
Let me get this straight. religion is science and because of the introversion it is now philosophy..... Is that your qoute? I hope not. One of the problems with religion as I see it is the extroversion. Trying to get others to believe because you do...... You didn't miss any "buzz" words, I could reconize. However, I am still reeling over your statement......

Happy Monkey · 02-17-2005, 06:52 PM

Religion was the equivalent of science - an attempt to make an orderly description of the operation of the world - before science was invented.

Brown Thrasher · 02-18-2005, 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Happy Monkey

Religion was the equivalent of science - an attempt to make an orderly description of the operation of the world - before science was invented.

If that's the case, why the continued argument on this subject. Probably because others have different views......

02-10-2005, 03:43 AM	#361
jaguar whig Join Date: Apr 2001 Posts: 5,075	someone forgot their pills today. __________________ Good friends, good books and a sleepy conscience: this is the ideal life. - Twain

02-10-2005, 02:16 PM	#363
lookout123 changed his status to single Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Right behind you. No, the other side. Posts: 10,308	wow, i haven't popped into this thread in awhile. looks like i wasn't missing much... just mediocre trolling. __________________ Getting knocked down is no sin, it's not getting back up that's the sin

02-11-2005, 05:14 AM	#364
OnyxCougar Junior Master Dwellar Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Kingdom of Atlantia Posts: 2,979	Yeah, it's pretty much been trashed. __________________ Impotentes defendere libertatem non possunt. "Repetition does not transform a lie into a truth." ~Franklin D. Roosevelt

02-15-2005, 04:07 PM	#365
mrnoodle bent Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: under the weather Posts: 2,656	Actually, it might be a useful case study for the thread. Did that evolve, or was it created by too much meth? __________________ Sìn a nall na cuaranan sin. -- Cha mhór is fheairrde thu iad, tha iad coltach ri cat air a dhathadh

02-16-2005, 05:31 PM	#367
Happy Monkey I think this line's mostly filler. Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: DC Posts: 13,575	Are you sure? __________________ _________________ \|...............\| We live in the nick of times. \| Len 17, Wid 3 \| \|_______________\| [pics]

02-16-2005, 06:48 PM	#369
Happy Monkey I think this line's mostly filler. Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: DC Posts: 13,575	You or I can say what we like about the reason for life. Evolution, being science, can not. It can only describe the mechanism, not the reason. __________________ _________________ \|...............\| We live in the nick of times. \| Len 17, Wid 3 \| \|_______________\| [pics]

02-17-2005, 06:52 PM	#374
Happy Monkey I think this line's mostly filler. Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: DC Posts: 13,575	Religion was the equivalent of science - an attempt to make an orderly description of the operation of the world - before science was invented. __________________ _________________ \|...............\| We live in the nick of times. \| Len 17, Wid 3 \| \|_______________\| [pics]

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)