The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Images > Image of the Day
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Image of the Day Images that will blow your mind - every day. [Blog] [RSS] [XML]

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 06-09-2002, 06:42 PM   #76
BruteForce
Lead Subordinate
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 15
Effective police force?

Is this the effective police force you speak of?

http://www.efa.org.au/Campaigns/alert200205.html
BruteForce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2002, 06:51 PM   #77
Nic Name
retired
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,930
In the USA it's called the PATRIOT ACT.
Nic Name is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2002, 06:55 PM   #78
henry fitch
Dry Nurse
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 23
Quote:
Requires knowledge of the image in question which many people here would know. Basicly it says "argueing on the internet is like running in the special olympics, even if you win, you're still a retard" fark refers to a website called fark.com , talk a look.
Oh! I get it; yes, I did see that image. Your spelling threw me off; with the word "imagine" there, it isn't much of a sentence at all.
henry fitch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2002, 07:00 PM   #79
Nic Name
retired
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,930
Googlejag
Nic Name is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2002, 07:02 PM   #80
elSicomoro
Person who doesn't update the user title
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 12,486
Re: Effective police force?

Quote:
Originally posted by BruteForce
Is this the effective police force you speak of?
I'm not sure if you were referring to me or jag, but I was speaking of the United States in my post. Of course, our government is trying to do the same thing in terms of monitoring communications, and it wouldn't surprise me if they try to bring back the War Powers Act as it was used during WW1.
elSicomoro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2002, 07:29 PM   #81
Nic Name
retired
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,930
http://www.peta.edu.au/
Nic Name is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2002, 07:29 PM   #82
russotto
Professor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,788
Quote:
Originally posted by jaguar
My guess is that I’m arguing with people from the 'small-government' school of thought. Call me insane but I’m willing to delegate things like law enforcement to the government we elect.
Law enforcement? Sure; they make the laws, they can enforce them. But personal defense? A different matter entirely. Law enforcement just means they track down and punish anyone who breaks the laws (they do a bad job at this, and not just in the US, but that's another story). Thing is, if someone's attacking me, I'm MUCH more interested in stopping the attack than in whether they are punished afterwards.
russotto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2002, 07:37 PM   #83
Nic Name
retired
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,930
using sex in an attempt to get the thread off gun contol ...

Nic Name is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2002, 08:20 PM   #84
jaguar
whig
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 5,075
syc i know the second amendment to quote myself
Quote:
Each nation has its own collection of political lobby groups and socio-political hang-ups,
Mabye i should have made it more clear what i was refering to, my equlancy tends to fail early in the morning (its now 11am here). I agree, education is essential, life oppotunities and all that are the key - any solution i think is better than arming the populace in some desperate bid for self-defence as a substitute to an effective police force. Yes the word imagine would have thrown me off too =)

Quote:
Law enforcement? Sure; they make the laws, they can enforce them. But personal defense? A different matter entirely. Law enforcement just means they track down and punish anyone who breaks the laws (they do a bad job at this, and not just in the US, but that's another story). Thing is, if someone's attacking me, I'm MUCH more interested in stopping the attack than in whether they are punished afterwards.
If you know you're gooing to be caught afterwards you're not going to do it are you, or less likely. While the cops here aren't a perfect bunch they generally seem to do a pretty good job - i'm judging that by the experience of myself and those around me

pink has nice teeth.
__________________
Good friends, good books and a sleepy conscience: this is the ideal life.
- Twain

Last edited by jaguar; 06-09-2002 at 08:22 PM.
jaguar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2002, 08:40 PM   #85
elSicomoro
Person who doesn't update the user title
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 12,486
Quote:
Originally posted by jaguar
If you know you're gooing to be caught afterwards you're not going to do it are you, or less likely.
I don't know how things are going in Australia, but here, we seem to have a new breed of criminals. A group that either a)Doesn't think they'll get caught, b) Thinks they can beat the system on a technicality (which does happen), or c) Doesn't care if they get caught or not.
elSicomoro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2002, 08:42 PM   #86
juju
no one of consequence
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 2,839
Quote:
Originally posted by sycamore
Strictly as a hypothetical, maybe someone will try to mug Maggie (not that I want to see that happen, of course) and WILL draw a gun faster than her. But, because she is also carrying, there is an equalizing factor. It gives her a fighting chance. To put it plainly, it moves her status from "completely fucked" to "possibly fucked." :)
Poor Maggie. I think she's hypothetically mugged/raped every time we have a gun debate.
juju is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2002, 08:47 PM   #87
Nic Name
retired
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,930
Pink fails to change the topic ...

Nic Name is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2002, 08:55 PM   #88
elSicomoro
Person who doesn't update the user title
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 12,486
Quote:
Originally posted by juju
Poor Maggie. I think she's hypothetically mugged/raped every time we have a gun debate.
I know...that's horrible.

Seriously, the only reason I used Maggie in my example is b/c she is a fervent gun rights supporter, and she is the only one here that I know of that owns a gun (or at least talks about it).

Last edited by elSicomoro; 06-09-2002 at 09:07 PM.
elSicomoro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2002, 09:40 PM   #89
dave
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I own a number of guns, but I don't carry.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2002, 09:44 PM   #90
BrianR
Cleverly disguised as a responsible adult
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 3,338
Okay, now I'll say something.

Maggie is not the only one here who openly owns a gun(s), will admit to it, carries one for personal protection, and generally supports the NRA. I am 100% right behind her (I love the womens' movement from here). She is doing a fine job of defending herself and her opinions without me muddying the waters.

But you never know who might be on her side without saying it.

Brian

PS to Maggie, I gave you a free pass on that misquote about the ends justifying the means in an earlier forum.
You owe me one.

B
__________________
Never be afraid to tell the world who you are. -- Anonymous
BrianR is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:58 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.