|
Home Base A starting point, and place for threads don't seem to belong anywhere else |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-16-2003, 07:06 PM | #1 |
Civil Civilian
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Birmingham England
Posts: 34
|
Man or woman ... what rights.
I read an article some time ago, the details and dates elude me, based on a gender crisis for employment.
A male had undergone a sex change, he had spent years going through the process and ended up having the operations required to make him 'female' by surgery. She therefore becomes a registered female. A time after she had applied for a position with a chemical company and was informed that due to the process and chemicals used it would be detrimental to women and there reproductive system and women where not employed for that role. The case ended in a court battle. What are your thoughts?
__________________
'It takes 2 people to tell a lie,' 'One to lie, and one to listen'. Homer Simpson |
01-16-2003, 07:50 PM | #2 |
Syndrome of a Down
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: West Chester
Posts: 1,367
|
Almond Joy's got nuts. Mounds's got big coconut mounds. Take off the wrapper, and it's easy to tell the difference.
Though I will grant that when told "this job would screw up the female reproductive system," replying "I don't have one" is a pretty good comeback... |
01-16-2003, 08:01 PM | #3 |
Disorderly Orderly
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Northern Virginia/DC
Posts: 53
|
Almond joys got nuts...
Ha HA HA ... LMAO
I wasn't going to touch this one.... Literally... But, if he, converts to a she, then she has no reproductive system organs, so she is really still a he, only disguised through surgery, and make-up, as a she. Therefore, now damage can be caused to the reproductive sys.... Oh forget it. It's just too weird...
__________________
The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or... the one. -- Spock |
01-16-2003, 08:04 PM | #4 |
dripping with ignorance
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Grand Forks ND
Posts: 642
|
Where is maggie I'd like to know where she stands on this one.
__________________
After the seventh beer I generally try and stay away from the keyboard, I apologize for what happens when I fail. |
01-16-2003, 08:29 PM | #5 |
lobber of scimitars
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Phila Burbs
Posts: 20,774
|
I was thinking the same thing.
I certainly hope the lady won the suit, since the reason that they seem to use to deny the job does not apply in this situation.
__________________
wolf eht htiw og "Conspiracies are the norm, not the exception." --G. Edward Griffin The Creature from Jekyll Island High Priestess of the Church of the Whale Penis |
01-17-2003, 11:00 AM | #6 | |
in the Hour of Scampering
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Jeffersonville PA (15 mi NW of Philadelphia)
Posts: 4,060
|
Quote:
__________________
"Neither can his Mind be thought to be in Tune,whose words do jarre; nor his reason In frame, whose sentence is preposterous..." |
|
01-17-2003, 11:03 AM | #7 | |
in the Hour of Scampering
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Jeffersonville PA (15 mi NW of Philadelphia)
Posts: 4,060
|
Re: Almond joys got nuts...
Quote:
A post-operative transsexual woman has genetalia and hormone balance matching those of a born woman. So what "really a he" means is only a matter of genotype...and even that may be questionable. Unless you use a microsocope that doesn't count for much.
__________________
"Neither can his Mind be thought to be in Tune,whose words do jarre; nor his reason In frame, whose sentence is preposterous..." Last edited by MaggieL; 01-17-2003 at 12:31 PM. |
|
01-17-2003, 11:30 AM | #8 |
no one of consequence
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 2,839
|
So, just because it's out of site, it doesn't exist? Hear no XY, see no XY.
|
01-17-2003, 12:24 PM | #9 | |
Professor
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,788
|
Quote:
This case ought to be pretty easy (and wouldn't have come up if someone at the company had been thinking) -- a women with no reproductive organs (whether due to a sex change or surgical removal) isn't subject to the damage caused by the chemicals, so the reason for barring women doesn't apply. |
|
01-17-2003, 12:40 PM | #10 | |
in the Hour of Scampering
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Jeffersonville PA (15 mi NW of Philadelphia)
Posts: 4,060
|
Quote:
The somatic effects of an XX genotype are all hormonally moderated, AFAIK. The XY women with androgen insensitivity syndrome are examples of this. If I'm not mistaken, excluding a post-hysterectomy woman from a job "because of a mutagenic environment" has been adjudcated to be sex discrimination.
__________________
"Neither can his Mind be thought to be in Tune,whose words do jarre; nor his reason In frame, whose sentence is preposterous..." |
|
01-21-2003, 08:37 PM | #11 |
Drawn Druid
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: wisconsin
Posts: 32
|
Brothers, sisters, transgenders, asexuals, come together!
Sure the correct assumption is : She doesnt have female reproductive organs! So on that note, shes the winnah! I mean basically the whole thing is discriminatory to begin with. But this is science. These guys make and break the rules.
__________________
Fear profits man nothing, though you may go hide in a hole if you wish. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|