My art & stuff - Page 2

Whit · 09-03-2003, 12:55 AM

      I remember this commercial. Damn it, Bruce, are you the reason this chic is so pissed? Screw it, I've got a thing for intense borderline psychotic chics anyway...

Happy Monkey · 09-03-2003, 09:45 AM

If people can get copyrights on collages, or "photomosaics", or Warhol-style images, or any number of bits of modern art, I think curiousgemini is OK.

09-03-2003, 10:00 AM

Yeh. Knowing from a ton of copyright research I did a few years ago after I got threatened by someone (for parody - it was a ridiculous claim, my response said so, and I never heard from her or her lawyer again), those pictures are OK in the sense of him copyrighting them. What may be fuzzy (I don't recall) is his right to distribute modified copies of the originals. Copyright law is a mess. I don't feel like researching. But yes, he can copyright his derivations.

Uryoces · 09-03-2003, 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by dave
Yeh. Knowing from a ton of copyright research I did a few years ago after I got threatened by someone (for parody - it was a ridiculous claim, my response said so, and I never heard from her or her lawyer again)

If you mean the work was parody/satire, that's protected by law.

09-03-2003, 12:55 AM	#16
Whit Umm ... yeah. Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Arkansas, USA Posts: 949	I remember this commercial. Damn it, Bruce, are you the reason this chic is so pissed? Screw it, I've got a thing for intense borderline psychotic chics anyway... __________________ A friend will help you move. A true friend will help you move a body.

09-03-2003, 09:45 AM	#17
Happy Monkey I think this line's mostly filler. Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: DC Posts: 13,575	Well, If people can get copyrights on collages, or "photomosaics", or Warhol-style images, or any number of bits of modern art, I think curiousgemini is OK. __________________ _________________ \|...............\| We live in the nick of times. \| Len 17, Wid 3 \| \|_______________\| [pics]

09-03-2003, 10:00 AM	#18
dave Guest Posts: n/a	Yeh. Knowing from a ton of copyright research I did a few years ago after I got threatened by someone (for parody - it was a ridiculous claim, my response said so, and I never heard from her or her lawyer again), those pictures are OK in the sense of him copyrighting them. What may be fuzzy (I don't recall) is his right to distribute modified copies of the originals. Copyright law is a mess. I don't feel like researching. But yes, he can copyright his derivations.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)