The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-09-2006, 09:10 AM   #16
FallenFairy
nope
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 322
Quote:
Originally Posted by Undertoad
Not me dude. (Am I everyone you argue with now?)
__________________
~going, going... gone now
FallenFairy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2006, 01:28 PM   #17
unlawflcombatnt
Layperson
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: California
Posts: 13
Wages vs. Income

Quote:
Originally Posted by Undertoad
Why use wages and not personal income for the comparison? Almost everyone in the country, from rich to poor, receives non-wage income.
Though that may be qualitatively true, non-wage income is minuscule to most Americans. Most Americans derive nearly all their income from wages. It's only those at the top who receive enough rent and dividend income to make a significant difference. As a result, the use of average income overstates what the average American actually receives.

Most working Americans with IRAs or 401Ks receive 0 income annually from them. And that's where most of middle America's so-called stock market investment is. Outside of that, the majority of Americans have little in the way of investment income. Interest on bank or savings deposits contributes only a trickle to most people's income.

Thus the bulk of most Americans spendable income comes from wages. It is these wages (supplemented by borrowing) that finance the necessary consumer spending to keep our economy alive. If wages continue to stagnate, and borrowing declines, that necessary consumer spending will also decline. Purchase of America's production will decline as a result. This will reduce the demand for production and the demand for labor to provide that production. If demand for labor declines, so will employment and wages. As a result, aggregate worker/consumer income will decline even further. There will be progressively less spendable consumer wealth, resulting in less spending & demand for goods, and still less demand for the labor to produce goods.
unlawflcombatnt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2006, 01:51 PM   #18
Undertoad
Radical Centrist
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cottage of Prussia
Posts: 31,423
Well there's non-wage income, and then there's income that is not wages. Things like medical benefits, pensions, waitstaff tips, medicaid/medicare checks, social security checks, veterans benefits checks, other entitlement checks, inheritances and eBay sales also figure into people's standard of living.

As a sole proprietor I can take income from my dying company which is not wages (which is still reported on a different IRS schedule). And I am just next to poor at this point, so I "count".
Undertoad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2006, 05:15 PM   #19
unlawflcombatnt
Layperson
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: California
Posts: 13
Income

Quote:
Originally Posted by Undertoad
As a sole proprietor I can take income from my dying company which is not wages (which is still reported on a different IRS schedule). And I am just next to poor at this point, so I "count".
How do you report your income to the IRS?
unlawflcombatnt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2006, 06:52 PM   #20
Undertoad
Radical Centrist
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cottage of Prussia
Posts: 31,423
Schedule C.
Undertoad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2006, 07:07 PM   #21
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
But you are not mainstream, or typical.......... or normal.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2006, 10:19 PM   #22
Clodfobble
UNDER CONDITIONAL MITIGATION
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 20,012
I file with Schedule C as well. Along with at least 30 or so other people at my company. But as a rule they hire a lot of contract labor, I couldn't tell you how many people in the general population have work situations like I do.
Clodfobble is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2006, 02:31 AM   #23
tw
Read? I only know how to write.
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
Quote:
Originally Posted by Undertoad
Not me dude. (Am I everyone you argue with now?)
I don't have any problem with the facts provided by that economist. I have a problem with what he suggests as solutions; that changing monetary policy can fix these problems.

Meanwhile, whether wages are most of or just one source of America's income, the fact remains that American wages and other income sources have remained flat while corporate productivity and profits have climbed immensely. I don't believe anyone here disputes that - at least from the perspective as I read them.

Facts from that economist were also stated in a cited article from The Economist. I am not entirely sure, but I believe Greenspan also said that. However if one listens to Greenspan, one cannot always be sure what he said.

I believe the consensus here is that common man American income has not increased in this short century.

Last edited by tw; 03-10-2006 at 02:35 AM.
tw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2006, 03:50 AM   #24
slang
St Petersburg, Florida
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,423
Quote:
Originally Posted by unlawflcombatnt
..... and borrowing declines.....

Seriously here.

Is borrowing still increasing even now? I'll be God damned if I borrow for most anything nowdays. The contracts are here one day and gone the next.

The trend with the people that I know is to pay off debt with an urgency I've personally never seen before.

Borrowing SHOULD be on the decline.

Oh, and yes of course....this is vewy vewy bad ....and Bush's fault. That's obvious
slang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2006, 08:50 PM   #25
slang
St Petersburg, Florida
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,423
Just call me.....Mr. Thread killer slang
slang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2006, 10:58 PM   #26
Torrere
a real smartass
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 1,121
Ooh! That graph of productivity resembles a purty exponential function!
Torrere is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2006, 12:11 PM   #27
unlawflcombatnt
Layperson
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: California
Posts: 13
Wage-Productivity Gap

Quote:
Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce
I'm not convinced it will help us by increase US wages to stimulate Chinese production. That's the fly in the ointment.

Of course somes wages are increasing.
Excellent points. Wages are increasing for the top income earners, and have been for the last 20 years. Increases in the wages of high income earners does much less to increase consumer spending than wage increases of lower income earners. As people earn more, they spend a smaller fraction of their income on consumer goods. They do, however, have more money to invest. But as consumer income stagnates, there are fewer investment opportunities created, because consumer spending creates those investment opportunities. The result is that this extra "capital" goes into non-capital investment areas, such as stocks and bonds, or toward overvaluation of the housing market. Much capital is now going into foreign production facilities, as you alluded to. That creates NO jobs in this country. In effect, the money American workers pay for goods is slowly leaking out of the economy into non capital goods endeavors and foreign capital goods purchases, creating jobs overseas and further reducing labor demand (and jobs) in the U.S.

The economy needs balance between the "means of production" & "means of consumption."
unlawflcombatnt is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:25 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.