|
Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
12-06-2011, 11:52 AM | #1 |
barely disguised asshole, keeper of all that is holy.
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,401
|
Gah - communication breakdown ...
To some, marriage is a religious contract, a civil union is not. Essentially the same, but without that one element. Is it right, fair, just... not the issue. All I am saying is that some do not view the two as equal with respect to the religious component and that is a BIG difference to those people. I am not saying they cannot nor should not have all the same benefits, just that the two terms have different meanings to some.
__________________
"like strapping a pillow on a bull in a china shop" Bullitt |
12-06-2011, 12:30 PM | #2 | |
Person who doesn't update the user title
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bottom lands of the Missoula floods
Posts: 6,402
|
Quote:
If marriage is a "religious contract", then should it be a matter of federal law providing for - or protecting - some citizens, but not others? If one agrees that separate is not equal, then the "civil unions" are only the current step in the direction of equal civil rights for everyone. Anyone believing they are equal, essentially owns the burden of proof to justify and to rectify each and every instance of inequality. It would be easier to change the word "marriage" throughout our laws to mean only the religious contract within any given religion, and to have all legal aspects of "marriage license" changed to words meaning something akin to "civil union". In any case, whether one believes a candidate will separate his "religion" or beliefs from his "elected office" is simply a matter of each person's own judgment of the candidate... no rules to be followed, just personal perception. Isn't it odd that we don't usually even consider such an issue with a candidate whose religion is similar to our own. . Last edited by Lamplighter; 12-06-2011 at 01:09 PM. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|