|
Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
02-15-2005, 10:16 AM | #1 |
High Propagandist
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 111
|
Why are we vilified?: US freedom, or US policies
On Meet the press this Sunday, there was a cogent, relevant, and heated debate between Natan Sharansky and Pat Buchanan. The debate cut right to the core of what has launched us into WWIV. As noted in prior posts, Pat Bucahan, has come out on the side of a policy based paradigm, as opposed to Natan Sharansky, who viewed the attack on America as a further attack on the freedoms of the Western world or so it seemed. It raises an interesting issue, ie. what is the definition of freedom? Is freedom the right to make as much money on whom ever's land, or is it the right to live in a secure world, one entriely free of tyranny. If you look at Buchanan's recent writings, you can see the logic. Although Buchanan voted for Bush, I doubt that means he'll roll over and die over the man's policies, nor will he fall prey to naive, ramblings of GW Bush. So the question remains, what is freedom? I seems as though to GW Bush and neo-cons, its the freedom to make billions on the backs of corpses and countries, thus instituting a system that gurantees that everybody will do business, or else.
-Walrus Last edited by iamthewalrus109; 02-15-2005 at 11:19 AM. |
02-15-2005, 06:02 PM | #2 |
Macavity
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: A Black Box
Posts: 157
|
Are you asking about the hypocrisy of George W. Bush, or are you actually asking about "freedom"? I think by now that it should be apparent to all that Bushco's foreign policy adventures have nothing to do with the concept of "freedom," as defined by the founding fathers of this country and most philosophers.
__________________
Macavity, Macavity, there's no on like Macavity, He's broken every human law, he breaks the law of gravity. - T.S. Eliot, Old Possum's Book of Practical Cats |
02-15-2005, 06:18 PM | #3 |
still eats dirt
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 3,031
|
I think by now that it should be apparent to all that Bushco's foreign policy adventures have nothing to do with the concept of "freedom," as defined by the founding fathers of this country and most philosophers.
Sure it does! We went into Iraq with the specific goal of removing a dictator we installed and allowing the people to vote, right? Its all about protecting our freedom by installing democracies around the world-- nobody could possibly lose from these actions which are ordained by a power above our founding fathers: God. At least, thats what I've been told. |
02-15-2005, 09:45 PM | #4 |
to live and die in LA
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,090
|
I think we're reviled for exporting our crappy reality television. And I can't say that I blame them ...
__________________
to live and die in LA |
02-15-2005, 11:23 PM | #5 |
When Do I Get Virtual Unreality?
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Raytown, Missouri
Posts: 12,719
|
I'm still waiting for the nuke that results from the overseas popularity of Baywatch.
__________________
"To those of you who are wearing ties, I think my dad would appreciate it if you took them off." - Robert Moog |
02-15-2005, 11:58 PM | #6 | |
Macavity
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: A Black Box
Posts: 157
|
Quote:
__________________
Macavity, Macavity, there's no on like Macavity, He's broken every human law, he breaks the law of gravity. - T.S. Eliot, Old Possum's Book of Practical Cats |
|
02-16-2005, 12:30 AM | #7 |
to live and die in LA
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,090
|
wow. way to bring in non-sequiter references, there Schrod. nicely done.
__________________
to live and die in LA |
02-16-2005, 10:25 AM | #8 | ||
High Propagandist
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 111
|
Quote:
Quote:
To go back to the original intention of this thread, freedom, in the sense that it is being brandied around by George Bush, is of a corporate and economic sense, not one of self-deterimination, or one that is dictated by natural law. We were attacked for our policies, and freedom doesn't mean that we are free to extract what we please from where ever we please, because the Western world believes in free trade, and women's rights, and values only the secruity of those who refuse to fight for their own freedoms. Its an abomination that will get us all killed in the end. This country was based on an agrarian society, one which was forged from the hands of white, male, wealthy, landowners, who were loosing money to England, let's face it. But when they were free of the occupation, which amounted mostly to financial tyranny, they saw a chance to create a great society. Iraqis need to realize this on there own. Although many neo-cons flash around Japan as an example of the exportation of democracy, I feel the comparision is un-waranted and incorrect. In that case the emperor agreed to a formal surrender, and the conflict was much more brutal and dramatic, in that case they're entire society was basically destroyed, including the social infrastructure. In Iraq, Islam is part of the DNA and not ready to be removed from the strain yet. In the end our forces our over deployed and are vilified by millions. Is this what America has become. In the words of Richard Nixon: "Did we come all the way for this?" -Walrus |
||
02-16-2005, 11:49 AM | #9 | |
Radical Centrist
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cottage of Prussia
Posts: 31,423
|
It's OK man, you can feel good about the Iraqi vote and still be against Bush. Here is the article, finally, that puts it in perspective (for New Yorkers at least):
When Good News Feels Bad http://www.newyorkmetro.com/nymetro/...076/index.html Quote:
|
|
02-16-2005, 01:51 PM | #10 |
still eats dirt
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 3,031
|
...a new subspecies of liberal guilt arose—over the pleasure liberals took in bad news from Iraq...
Hell, I never took pleasure in seeing bad news come out of Iraq and I was very much against the invasion. Each time another car bomb went off, everytime the death toll of US troops went up I clenched my teeth and grumbled that things in this world are seriously fucked up. Anyone who took pleasure in that kind of news needs some counseling. At a certain point during the Vietnam War, a majority of Americans—those of us who were in favor of unilateral U.S. withdrawal—were in a de facto alliance with the North Vietnamese, the Vietcong, and the Soviets. I'm sorry, but I don't agree at all with this part of the article and I think the author needs to be kicked in the head for this type of binary grouping. The violent "you're either for us or against us" mentality is going to do us all damage, someday. At this time I'm really happy for the Iraqi people, but I still don't agree that the ends justify the means in this mess. Unlike the majority of the public, I'd still like to see someone held responsible for the intelligence screw-up that lead to us thinning our military over non-existant WMD and permitting more than one thousand of our soliders to die over what is now deemed to be a bad rumor. But, ah, no one seemed to care then and no one seems to care now... |
02-16-2005, 02:57 PM | #11 |
whig
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 5,075
|
Is that meant to be journalism UT? I've vomited stuff with more intellectual nuance. I mean it's a well made troll, I'll give you that but troll it is. The elected party it looking like a bunch of Iranian stooges, the sunnis are on the warpath and the Kurds still are very much set of carving out their own little state. The soundbites might call the election a success, the reality is a little more complex. Looking at history and looking beyond the headlines might not be trendy but it's more intellectually rigourous than pretending that since the elections everything in Iraq has been coming up roses.
__________________
Good friends, good books and a sleepy conscience: this is the ideal life. - Twain |
02-16-2005, 03:45 PM | #12 |
Radical Centrist
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cottage of Prussia
Posts: 31,423
|
It's not journalism, it's an opinion essay.
I know for certain that your media is gloomier than ours is... |
02-16-2005, 06:40 PM | #13 |
whig
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 5,075
|
If i had handed that in to my final year teacher she would have failed me.
This is true, our media attempts to be objective, rather than slavish.
__________________
Good friends, good books and a sleepy conscience: this is the ideal life. - Twain |
02-16-2005, 07:10 PM | #14 |
The future is unwritten
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
|
I hear the election was a success.
OK, so a bunch of people voted because they couldn't get their ration card renewed if they didn't. Most people didn't know who they were voting for, just numbers. And this is only a trial run for voting for something meaningful. I'm glad the election was a success.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump. |
02-16-2005, 08:16 PM | #15 |
Macavity
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: A Black Box
Posts: 157
|
The success of that election remains to be seen in, IMO. We now have the countries on either side of Iraq - Syria and Iran - uniting in common defiance of the US. If our "freedom" as commonly perceived by the Muslim world is so wonderful, why should these two nations be taking their current stance?
Democracy is about the right of the governed to choose their own government. We have taken our Western tradition and imposed it upon that of a different culture. We gave one reason for doing this, and then quickly backpedaled when we found that our original premise had been an erroneous one. The actions of the US have shown a lack of integrity that is deplorable. When the US first invaded and overthrew Saddam, the majority of Iraqi's were happy to see Saddam go. Unfortunately, the US filled the vacuum of power left by Saddam's demise with only another vacuum. Iraqi cities can expect to have as little as two hours of electricity a day. Iraqi women are afraid to leave their homes to go to hospitals to give birth. American soldiers kill parents in front of their children at checkpoints (a tragic accident) or force innocent civilians to jump into the Tigris River (a deliberate act of atrocity). As Americans, we can reflect upon our country's creation with pride, as an act carried out by our own American forefathers. By contrast, the Iraqi's must look at their own "democracy" (if it stands) as an action imposed upon them by an alien culture and a nation which came to them in war, as an enemy, not as an ally, in peace. Where is the "freedom" in all this?
__________________
Macavity, Macavity, there's no on like Macavity, He's broken every human law, he breaks the law of gravity. - T.S. Eliot, Old Possum's Book of Practical Cats |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|