The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-22-2014, 07:28 PM   #76
Undertoad
Radical Centrist
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cottage of Prussia
Posts: 31,423
Quote:
Originally Posted by Undertoad View Post
Well, if the cops are going to pull this shit during routine traffic stops, they're going to get reined in by the courts quick enough.
Wasington Post: Can the cops search your phone without a warrant? The Supreme Court intends to weigh in.
Undertoad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2014, 10:56 PM   #77
slang
St Petersburg, Florida
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,423
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Sarge View Post
TW - Did you know that you can own a 155mm howitzer legally in the US?
Could I carry a 155mm howitzer concealed in your state? Or is that open carry?

Must be nearly impossible to find a good comfortable rig for that.
slang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2014, 11:10 PM   #78
sexobon
I love it when a plan comes together.
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 9,793
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Sarge View Post
TW - Did you know that you can own a 155mm howitzer legally in the US? ...
With a concealed carry permit you should be able to haul it behind your deuce as long as you stay one masking terrain feature away.
sexobon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2014, 09:12 PM   #79
tw
Read? I only know how to write.
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
Quote:
Originally Posted by sexobon View Post
With a concealed carry permit you should be able to haul it behind your deuce ...
Is that a 155 mm in your pocket or are you just ...
tw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2014, 12:24 AM   #80
Elspode
When Do I Get Virtual Unreality?
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Raytown, Missouri
Posts: 12,719
Until I am allowed to carry a personal tactical nuclear weapon on my person without being hassled, the Second Amendment is a joke.
__________________
"To those of you who are wearing ties, I think my dad would appreciate it if you took them off." - Robert Moog
Elspode is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2014, 04:21 PM   #81
tw
Read? I only know how to write.
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elspode View Post
Until I am allowed to carry a personal tactical nuclear weapon on my person without being hassled, the Second Amendment is a joke.
So why is nobody laughing? Some people need that, 155 mm howizters and assault rifles for personal protection. No joke.
tw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2014, 04:47 PM   #82
Big Sarge
Werepandas - lurking in your shadows
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: In the Deep South
Posts: 3,408
You can possess mortars, cannons, etc with a Destructive Device License. Machineguns only require a Class 3 permit
__________________
Give a man a match, & he'll be warm for 20 seconds. But toss that man a white phosphorus grenade and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
Big Sarge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2014, 01:24 PM   #83
Undertoad
Radical Centrist
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cottage of Prussia
Posts: 31,423
Quote:
Originally Posted by Undertoad
Well, if the cops are going to pull this shit during routine traffic stops, they're going to get reined in by the courts quick enough.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/...0F01R320140625

Quote:
(Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday ruled that police officers usually need a warrant before they can search an arrested suspect's cellphone, a major decision in favor of privacy rights at a time of increasing concern over government encroachment in digital communications.

In an opinion written by Chief Justice John Roberts, the court said that the right of police to search an arrested suspect at the scene without a warrant does not extend in most circumstances to data held on a cellphone. There are some emergency situations in which a warrantless search would be permitted, the court noted.

The unanimous 9-0 ruling goes against law enforcement agencies, including the U.S. Department of Justice, which wanted more latitude to search without having to obtain a warrant.
9-0.
Undertoad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2014, 07:13 AM   #84
Undertoad
Radical Centrist
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cottage of Prussia
Posts: 31,423
Apple expands data encryption under iOS 8, making handover to cops moot

"On devices running iOS 8, your personal data such as photos, messages (including attachments), email, contacts, call history, iTunes content, notes, and reminders is placed under the protection of your passcode," the company wrote on its website Wednesday evening. "Unlike our competitors, Apple cannot bypass your passcode and therefore cannot access this data. So it's not technically feasible for us to respond to government warrants for the extraction of this data from devices in their possession running iOS 8."
Undertoad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2014, 07:52 AM   #85
glatt
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 27,717
Is that new iOS 8 encryption an effective defense against the so-called "ISMI catcher" surveillance that's been in the news lately now that a new phone has been released that detects such snooping?

The article linked above said that in only 2 days of driving around DC recently, the following locations appeared to have surveillance devices trying to trick cellphones into thinking they were connecting to their carrier when in fact they were connecting to a device that was collecting their data.
Name:  ISMI catcher.jpg
Views: 148
Size:  55.9 KB
glatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2014, 08:43 AM   #86
Undertoad
Radical Centrist
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cottage of Prussia
Posts: 31,423
It would not be a defense... after data leaves your phone, your phone's encryption won't matter.
Undertoad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2014, 09:10 AM   #87
glatt
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 27,717
That sucks.
I always assumed in a fatalistic sort of a way that nothing on my phone is safe, because, you know, the NSA. But part of me never wanted to fully believe it, and I just use my phone as if it is my phone and nobody else can read it.

But apparently, it's constantly being read. I work inside one of those red dots.

Fuckers.
glatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2014, 09:31 AM   #88
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
I can see recording the phones passing by with these IMSI 'check points' for lack of a better description. With the ISMIs hooked together, individual phones could be tracked, even in real time if they were watching a particular phone/person. But to listen to snatches of phone conversations hoping to catch something juicy seems a waste to me.

Well Senator, we've logged eleventy seven gigs of grocery lists, half that much of spousal excuses/apologies, and several gigs of heavy breathing.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2014, 09:39 AM   #89
glatt
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 27,717
I'm a little surprised my employer hasn't shut down all our phones. We have a lot of highly confidential client business information that's sent around by company emails and all that can be read by these things.

I imagine Wall Steet is loaded with these devices, but owned by private parties. It's like in the old days when people were using unscrambled wireless office phones when they were new and you could just listen in on conversations and get insider trading information.
glatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:19 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.