The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-24-2007, 03:08 PM   #76
Kitsune
still eats dirt
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 3,031
Quote:
Originally Posted by piercehawkeye45 View Post
Why would Bush send a "surge" of troops when no one wants that?
What, you think applying more force isn't going to make this better or something?
Kitsune is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2007, 03:11 PM   #77
yesman065
Banned - Self Imposed
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,847
Everyone in the Mideast is counting on the soft Americans to fold up their tents and leave. Only problem is they are facing a President who will not fold - period. Just when it seems that everyone is saying quit - he steps it up. Then the insurgent violence goes up a notch too. All these Mid East wacko leaders suddenly start making statements to the world and on and on. . .
Hmm. Just an observation.

Last edited by yesman065; 01-24-2007 at 03:16 PM.
yesman065 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2007, 06:01 PM   #78
piercehawkeye45
Franklin Pierce
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,695
Thats bull, if he wanted to "step it up" he would have sent more than 20,000 troops. We are going from 130,000 troops to 150,000, not much of a difference. If he sent 100,000 I wouldn't be happy but I would at least see his point, but I don't get 20,000.
piercehawkeye45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2007, 06:05 PM   #79
yesman065
Banned - Self Imposed
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,847
Quote:
Originally Posted by piercehawkeye45 View Post
Thats bull, if he wanted to "step it up" he would have sent more than 20,000 troops. We are going from 130,000 troops to 150,000, not much of a difference. If he sent 100,000 I wouldn't be happy but I would at least see his point, but I don't get 20,000.
Well 20,000 is like a 15 % or so increase - not a negligible increase.
Other Possibilities:
1) certain number needed for a specific task ie: securing Baghdad
2) didn't think he could get anymore
3) doesn't have anymore to spare
4)???
yesman065 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2007, 06:14 PM   #80
piercehawkeye45
Franklin Pierce
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,695
Quote:
1) certain number needed for a specific task ie: securing Baghdad
And let the rest of the country rot. I keep my stance.

Quote:
2) didn't think he could get anymore
You know that isn't true. He could have gotten a lot more if he wanted.

Quote:
3) doesn't have anymore to spare
Same as before. The troops go in shifts, he has a lot more troops to spare.
piercehawkeye45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2007, 08:34 PM   #81
Urbane Guerrilla
Person who doesn't update the user title
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 6,674
Had a look at Iraqi Kurdistan lately, PH? Yeah, sure, big rot there. The place has been a success story since the Northern No-Fly Zone.
__________________
Wanna stop school shootings? End Gun-Free Zones, of course.
Urbane Guerrilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2007, 09:42 PM   #82
piercehawkeye45
Franklin Pierce
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,695
Baghdad isn't the only problem, it would be ignorant to think so.

Besides, why would we just put the minimum amount of troops to secure a city? If we overloaded the city with troops, the transition would be a lot easier. There is no good excuse to only send 20,000 troops. Go all out or go home.
piercehawkeye45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2007, 06:30 AM   #83
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
Quote:
Originally Posted by yesman065 View Post
I think they fear us plenty. Why else would they be saying all they do to appease us. If at some point they didn't, they certainly do now. They need us to remain employed, to have the power we entrust them with.
Are you talking about 500 or so elected people that are so entrenched in the political scum, you'd play hell trying to dispose of them? Or by government do you mean the millions that occupy those desks, or benchs, or trucks, or tanks, and you can't do a damn thing about?
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2007, 07:43 AM   #84
yesman065
Banned - Self Imposed
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,847
Quote:
Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce View Post
Are you talking about 500 or so elected people that are so entrenched in the political scum, you'd play hell trying to dispose of them? Or by government do you mean the millions that occupy those desks, or benchs, or trucks, or tanks, and you can't do a damn thing about?
I was referring to the elected officials
yesman065 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2007, 10:58 AM   #85
glatt
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 27,717
Since we're talking about Iraq in a thread about Iran, I thought I'd throw in this recent encouraging news about Afghanistan. Apparently Bush is beginning to realize that if you look like you are losing a war in a country, you better fix it before it's too late. He's focusing new attention on Afghanistan, which hasn't been doing very well lately.

I though I'd post it because it's rare for Bush do do something that makes sense.

From the Washington Post.

Quote:
Bush Plans New Focus On Afghan Recovery
Extra $7 Billion Would Go to Security, Roads

By Michael Abramowitz
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, January 25, 2007; A01

After the bloodiest year in Afghanistan since the U.S. invasion, the Bush administration is preparing a series of new military, economic and political initiatives aimed partly at preempting an expected offensive this spring by Taliban insurgents, according to senior U.S. officials.

Even as it trumpeted a change of course in Iraq this month, the White House has completed a review of U.S. policy in Afghanistan. It will ask Congress for $7 billion to $8 billion in new funds for security, reconstruction and other projects in Afghanistan as part of the upcoming budget package, officials said.

That would represent a sizable increase in the U.S. commitment to the strife-torn country; since the 2001 U.S.-led invasion that toppled the Taliban, the United States has provided a little more than $14 billion in assistance for Afghanistan, the State Department says...

...
glatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2007, 01:17 PM   #86
Torrere
a real smartass
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 1,121
Wow! That's pretty cool.
Torrere is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2007, 08:37 PM   #87
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
I hope it's not too late. The poppy crop has been harvested and sold, the Taliban(and their ilk) have collected their money and are arming to the teeth.
Do you think they will be dissuaded by new infrastructure? That's the first thing they'll blow up.

Funds for security? What's the plan, bribe the Taliban? Money doesn't make the place more secure, soldiers do. Whether it be military or Blackwater, there has to be boots on the ground to provide security and I haven't heard of the UN peacekeepers being reinforced.

What we should have been doing right along, is providing a way for the locals to make a living with something besides poppies. That would have prevented the Taliban from extorting the profits from the poppy crop to buy arms.

If you want to know the truth about Afghanistan, read a short article called The Perfect Evil by Michael Yon.
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3

I know, I know, 3 parts, grumble, grumble......trust me, it's not long.

Here's another piece on Afghanistan, There be Dragons.

And the Canadians, Hiatus Corpus.

Or this pdf War: Canadian Style from the Toronto Star.

And The Long Road Ahead.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.

Last edited by xoxoxoBruce; 01-27-2007 at 08:52 PM.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2007, 08:52 PM   #88
Kitsune
still eats dirt
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 3,031
Quote:
Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce View Post
What we should have been doing right along, is providing a way for the locals to make a living with something besides poppies.
No, we should be doing what many radio talking heads have been discussing lately: look deep inside the heart of this great nation and ask "What would Ronald Reagan have done in this situation?"

He would have had the answer.
Kitsune is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2007, 09:02 PM   #89
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
Ronnie Rayguns would have nuked them, I suspect.

How about doing business in a Virgin Market.

Dasht-E-Margo....Desert of Death.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2007, 03:53 PM   #90
Phil
Hoodoo Guru
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 304
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kitsune View Post
No, we should be doing what many radio talking heads have been discussing lately: look deep inside the heart of this great nation and ask "What would Ronald Reagan have done in this situation?"

He would have had the answer.

did you forget to take your meds?!
__________________
Atheist n A person to be pitied in that he is unable to believe things for which there is no evidence, and who has thus deprived himself of a convenient means of feeling superior to others.
Phil is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:49 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.