US Pledge of Allegiance Ruled Unconstitutional - Page 6

Undertoad · 07-05-2002, 08:09 AM

If you read even the links the guy has provided, you see that the story is far from as clear as he makes it sound. It's another case of crappy journalism that K5 promotes as fast as it can because it fits 60% of the users' philosophy.

I'm sick and tired of having to debug stories myself.

Nic Name · 07-05-2002, 08:47 AM

I didn't say that I don't read Kuro5shin. I was just commenting on the link. It didn't get throught my Kuro5hit filter.

elSicomoro · 07-05-2002, 12:18 PM

It was a joke on my part Nic. To be honest, the story really didn't hold my interest.

elSicomoro · 02-28-2003, 05:33 PM

I posted this in the current Ashcroft thread, but props must be given to the judges in this case for having some cojones.

Court Upholds Ruling

vsp · 02-28-2003, 07:05 PM

Not that it'll matter when it goes before Scalia & Co., of course, but I'll give the 9th Circuit full points as well.

elSicomoro · 02-28-2003, 07:45 PM

I don't know what to think of the Court anymore. Scalia voted for giving the guy in Texas a chance to argue over a racially-stacked jury. Thomas was the only one that voted against that. Strange...

View Poll Results: Take "under God" out of the pledge?
Yes	17	60.71%
No	9	32.14%
No opinion	2	7.14%
Voters: 28. You may not vote on this poll

07-05-2002, 08:09 AM	#76
Undertoad Radical Centrist Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Cottage of Prussia Posts: 31,423	If you read even the links the guy has provided, you see that the story is far from as clear as he makes it sound. It's another case of crappy journalism that K5 promotes as fast as it can because it fits 60% of the users' philosophy. I'm sick and tired of having to debug stories myself.

07-05-2002, 08:47 AM	#77
Nic Name retired Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Toronto, Canada Posts: 1,930	I didn't say that I don't read Kuro5shin. I was just commenting on the link. It didn't get throught my Kuro5hit filter.

07-05-2002, 12:18 PM	#78
elSicomoro Person who doesn't update the user title Join Date: Jan 2001 Posts: 12,486	It was a joke on my part Nic. To be honest, the story really didn't hold my interest.

02-28-2003, 05:33 PM	#79
elSicomoro Person who doesn't update the user title Join Date: Jan 2001 Posts: 12,486	I posted this in the current Ashcroft thread, but props must be given to the judges in this case for having some cojones. Court Upholds Ruling

02-28-2003, 07:05 PM	#80
vsp Syndrome of a Down Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: West Chester Posts: 1,367	Not that it'll matter when it goes before Scalia & Co., of course, but I'll give the 9th Circuit full points as well.

02-28-2003, 07:45 PM	#81
elSicomoro Person who doesn't update the user title Join Date: Jan 2001 Posts: 12,486	I don't know what to think of the Court anymore. Scalia voted for giving the guy in Texas a chance to argue over a racially-stacked jury. Thomas was the only one that voted against that. Strange...

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)