Things you should do. - Page 6

Saddam Hussein · 11-22-2003, 11:34 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sycamore
It seems like you're trying to make me out to be a bad guy, when 5000+ posts and at least a dozen people on here would argue otherwise.

I can honestly say.....he's not a bad guy. Not as nice as me, but not a bad guy.

elSicomoro · 11-22-2003, 11:36 PM

Ummm...I appreciate the endorsement Saddam, but I wasn't quite looking for yours.

lumberjim · 11-22-2003, 11:53 PM

you know what's effed up? I'd like to tear off a little piece of hayward for posting the way she did before she knew who she was correcting, but i'm still pretty sure that its just dave in drag.
....but then there's that last post from bruce.......

i did notice, however, that there is a noticeable parrallel in this thread to the .juju/dave argument , but without the name calling and bruised feelings.....the same argument but both sides are being civil.......and this looks like both sides can see the others point. Is this a lesson?

....but then there's that last post from bruce......

oh, and syc is not sick.......although i can see how you'd be confused

11-23-2003, 12:19 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by lumberjim
but i'm still pretty sure that its just dave in drag.

Then you need to re-evaluate. I don't make multiple accounts. Anything I have to say, I'll say it under my real name.

lumberjim · 11-23-2003, 12:25 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by dave

Then you need to re-evaluate. I don't make multiple accounts. Anything I have to say, I'll say it under my real name.

that's good to know

who is she, then?

xoxoxoBruce · 11-23-2003, 12:28 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by lumberjim
uh, did i miss something, bruce?

Hayward posted: ETA: for your reading pleasure http://cybercrimes.net/99MSCCC/MSCC...le3/3.01.3.html Article III about posting Aprils stats. Go back and read my post again.

lumberjim · 11-23-2003, 12:51 AM

link won't load...mind paraphrasing?

11-23-2003, 12:53 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by lumberjim
that's good to know

who is she, then?

Like I have any idea. I'm just enjoying watching the retards fight.

xoxoxoBruce · 11-23-2003, 01:05 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by lumberjim
link won't load...mind paraphrasing?

Can't. Go back to her post on page 4.

HaywardNelson · 11-23-2003, 08:49 AM

"cunt" and "retards"...(!)(?)
CLEARLY, I am the idiot here.
Wow, there's so much wrong with those words, I am breathless.

xoxoxoBruce · 11-23-2003, 09:03 AM

That's part of your problem. There is nothing wrong with those words or in fact any words.
The things that may be right, wrong or somewhere in between are motives, methods, and messages.

ThreadHijackMan · 11-23-2003, 09:16 AM

So...............whadya think..........eh, never mind. This looks strangely interesting.

HaywardNelson · 11-23-2003, 09:18 AM

"There is nothing wrong with those words or in fact any words."

Um...is that a fact or an opinion? Read: any and all of Sycamore dissection posts.

HaywardNelson · 11-23-2003, 10:59 AM

"Those who feel they (a) cannot contribute to a discussion (b) cannot further their expertise in said discussion and (c) are flat-out rude/mean resort to arguing semantics and/or name calling"
~HaywardNelson

Once an opinion but has now been hereby classified as fact.

xoxoxoBruce · 11-23-2003, 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by HaywardNelson
"There is nothing wrong with those words or in fact any words."

Um...is that a fact or an opinion? Read: any and all of Sycamore dissection posts.

It's a fact.

11-22-2003, 11:53 PM	#78
lumberjim I can hear my ears Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 25,571	you know what's effed up? I'd like to tear off a little piece of hayward for posting the way she did before she knew who she was correcting, but i'm still pretty sure that its just dave in drag. ....but then there's that last post from bruce....... i did notice, however, that there is a noticeable parrallel in this thread to the .juju/dave argument , but without the name calling and bruised feelings.....the same argument but both sides are being civil.......and this looks like both sides can see the others point. Is this a lesson? ....but then there's that last post from bruce...... oh, and syc is not sick.......although i can see how you'd be confused __________________ This body holding me reminds me of my own mortality Embrace this moment, remember We are eternal, all this pain is an illusion ~MJKeenan

11-23-2003, 12:51 AM	#82
lumberjim I can hear my ears Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 25,571	link won't load...mind paraphrasing? __________________ This body holding me reminds me of my own mortality Embrace this moment, remember We are eternal, all this pain is an illusion ~MJKeenan

11-23-2003, 09:03 AM	#86
xoxoxoBruce The future is unwritten Join Date: Oct 2002 Posts: 71,105	That's part of your problem. There is nothing wrong with those words or in fact any words. The things that may be right, wrong or somewhere in between are motives, methods, and messages. __________________ The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.

11-22-2003, 11:36 PM	#77
elSicomoro Person who doesn't update the user title Join Date: Jan 2001 Posts: 12,486	Ummm...I appreciate the endorsement Saddam, but I wasn't quite looking for yours.

11-23-2003, 08:49 AM	#85
HaywardNelson Belt Conveyor Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: You secret agents don't need me to tell you. Posts: 66	"cunt" and "retards"...(!)(?) CLEARLY, I am the idiot here. Wow, there's so much wrong with those words, I am breathless.

11-23-2003, 09:16 AM	#87
ThreadHijackMan Changing the flow Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 51	So...............whadya think..........eh, never mind. This looks strangely interesting.

11-23-2003, 09:18 AM	#88
HaywardNelson Belt Conveyor Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: You secret agents don't need me to tell you. Posts: 66	"There is nothing wrong with those words or in fact any words." Um...is that a fact or an opinion? Read: any and all of Sycamore dissection posts.

11-23-2003, 10:59 AM	#89
HaywardNelson Belt Conveyor Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: You secret agents don't need me to tell you. Posts: 66	"Those who feel they (a) cannot contribute to a discussion (b) cannot further their expertise in said discussion and (c) are flat-out rude/mean resort to arguing semantics and/or name calling" ~HaywardNelson Once an opinion but has now been hereby classified as fact.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)