![]() |
|
Home Base A starting point, and place for threads don't seem to belong anywhere else |
View Poll Results: Do you own a gun? | |||
Yes |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
27 | 42.86% |
No |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
36 | 57.14% |
Voters: 63. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#511 |
Goon Squad Leader
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Seattle
Posts: 27,063
|
I'll answer this one.
No.
__________________
Be Just and Fear Not. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#512 | ||
lobber of scimitars
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Phila Burbs
Posts: 20,774
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
![]() ![]() "Conspiracies are the norm, not the exception." --G. Edward Griffin The Creature from Jekyll Island High Priestess of the Church of the Whale Penis |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#513 | |
Makes some feel uncomfortable
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 10,346
|
I did. What's all this, then?
Quote:
__________________
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#514 |
Makes some feel uncomfortable
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 10,346
|
And what about the article (that I can't find) about the three-month-old who owns a gun?
__________________
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#515 |
I hear them call the tide
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Perpetual Chaos
Posts: 30,852
|
I'm thinking that the legalese makes a distinction between ownership and possesion?
__________________
The most difficult thing is the decision to act, the rest is merely tenacity Amelia Earhart |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#516 |
Constitutional Scholar
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Ocala, FL
Posts: 4,006
|
There is no contradiction to clear up. The only thing that needs to be cleared up is your cluttered and dishonest mind.
__________________
"I'm completely in favor of the separation of Church and State. My idea is that these two institutions screw us up enough on their own, so both of them together is certain death." - George Carlin |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#517 |
erika
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: "the high up north"
Posts: 6,127
|
No, Radar, I think she's right... It can't be an inherent human right you're born with but that kids don't have... thats a contradiction.
__________________
not really back, you didn't see me, i was never here shhhhhh |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#518 |
Constitutional Scholar
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Ocala, FL
Posts: 4,006
|
You have a right to life when you are born and with that comes the right to defend that life. Parent's are the guardians of their children until they reach the age of majority and as such, they hold all decision making powers, and decide whether or not it is appropriate for them to have guns or if the parent will exercise the right to defend their family.
So there is no contradiction. We have a right to own guns at birth, and until we have reached the age of majority, that right is either exercised or not by our parents. When we reach the age of majority we take responsibility for our own life and our parents are no longer our guardians.
__________________
"I'm completely in favor of the separation of Church and State. My idea is that these two institutions screw us up enough on their own, so both of them together is certain death." - George Carlin |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#519 |
erika
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: "the high up north"
Posts: 6,127
|
We have a right to own guns at birth that we don't have the right to exercise ourselves?
Still not making sense to me, dude.
__________________
not really back, you didn't see me, i was never here shhhhhh |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#520 |
Constitutional Scholar
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Ocala, FL
Posts: 4,006
|
From the moment of your birth until the moment you reach the age of majority (Which is recognized as 18 in America) you are not really a person under the law. You are merely the chattel of your parents. You don't have any decision making authority or powers over your life. Your parents hold these powers for you until you reach the age of majority.
Your parents do not have the right to physically endanger you, but they do have the right to decide which of your rights they will allow you to exercise until you are the age of majority and are responsible for your own life and can make those decisions for yourself. You have the right to own a gun at birth. Your parents decide whether or not you will be allowed to exercise that right. Let's use someone else as an example other than a child to clear up the point. If you are a prisoner, you are prevented from exercising certain rights like the right to go where you want, when you want. The warden of the prison will decide which of your rights you will be allowed to exercise while you're in the prison and which you will not. This doesn't mean you don't have the rights, just that you will not be allowed to exercise them. Once you get out of prison, you are able to choose for yourself when you will exercise your rights again.
__________________
"I'm completely in favor of the separation of Church and State. My idea is that these two institutions screw us up enough on their own, so both of them together is certain death." - George Carlin |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#521 |
erika
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: "the high up north"
Posts: 6,127
|
So we have basic rights inherent to being a person but only if the government says you're old enough?
__________________
not really back, you didn't see me, i was never here shhhhhh |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#522 | |
lobber of scimitars
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Phila Burbs
Posts: 20,774
|
Quote:
There is a difference between "owning" and "using under supervision."
__________________
![]() ![]() "Conspiracies are the norm, not the exception." --G. Edward Griffin The Creature from Jekyll Island High Priestess of the Church of the Whale Penis |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#523 |
trying hard to be a better person
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 16,493
|
I have a philosophical question which I've thought about often while reading arguments about how it's unconstitutional to have restrictions on gun ownership.
If that is true, then what about all the other laws that restrict people from doing what they want? Some road rules. Smoking laws. Curfews. monopoly laws for business. There are so many situations where this argument can apply. I don't see how it's valid.
__________________
Kind words are the music of the world. F. W. Faber |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#524 |
Person who doesn't update the user title
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 6,674
|
Ringer's Paradox: it states, with considerable justice, that A freedom restricted is a freedom preserved.
In practice, laws of that kind are codified with the aim of preventing problems arising from exercising a freedom with absolutely no limitation whatsoever. The freedom to swing a fist ends where the other fellow's nose begins, and so forth. That is what Ringer's statement amounts to.
__________________
Wanna stop school shootings? End Gun-Free Zones, of course. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#525 | |
Makes some feel uncomfortable
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 10,346
|
Quote:
__________________
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|