Kentucky wants the US to go to hell - Page 3

SamIam · 03-04-2010, 08:14 PM

Even if you think the government needs a plan to get its house in order, why on earth is Bunning making a stand on this issue? It's political poison--even the Republican base knows people who are out of work. It's terrible economic policy--suddenly cutting off the taps would have nasty knock-on effects on the economy. And while it's a lot of money, it's one of the few government programs that pretty much unequivocally improve the net welfare of the American people. If Bunning wants to hold up something, how about finding some useless.

I find Bunning a hypocrit of the first degree. Since he is not up for election, he can do almost anything he wants to. Show up naked for Senate sessions or wander around with a lantern looking for an honest Republican.

It he had done this and put his own re-election on the line, he would get a kind of grudging admiration for me. But when he was still a viable Senator instead of a lame duck, we never heard a whisper from him about fixing the deposit. And if Democrats are the party of tax and spend, Republicans have shown themselves to be the party of spend and spend.

TheMercenary · 03-05-2010, 06:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SamIam

...he can do almost anything he wants to. Show up naked for Senate sessions or wander around with a lantern looking for an honest Republican.

classicman · 03-05-2010, 08:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SamIam

Even if you think the government needs a plan to get its house in order, why on earth is Bunning making a stand on this issue?

Quote:

-suddenly cutting off the taps would have nasty knock-on effects on the economy.
-it's one of the few government programs that pretty much unequivocally improve the net welfare of the American people.

Quote:

how about finding some useless (issue).

As he said, and I agree, but only TO A POINT

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bunning

If the Senate cannot find $10 billion to pay for a measure we all support, we will never pay for anything.

Oh and he wouldn't have gotten all the attention this has.

Happy Monkey · 03-05-2010, 11:17 AM

They can find it, but not in a unanimous consent "extend what we've got until we can write something better" debate.

Of course, when they do try to do the real bill, rather than a temporary extension, I'm sure the Republicans will filibuster it.

03-05-2010, 11:17 AM	#34
Happy Monkey I think this line's mostly filler. Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: DC Posts: 13,575	They can find it, but not in a unanimous consent "extend what we've got until we can write something better" debate. Of course, when they do try to do the real bill, rather than a temporary extension, I'm sure the Republicans will filibuster it. __________________ _________________ \|...............\| We live in the nick of times. \| Len 17, Wid 3 \| \|_______________\| [pics]

03-04-2010, 08:14 PM	#31
SamIam Registered User Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Not here Posts: 2,655	Even if you think the government needs a plan to get its house in order, why on earth is Bunning making a stand on this issue? It's political poison--even the Republican base knows people who are out of work. It's terrible economic policy--suddenly cutting off the taps would have nasty knock-on effects on the economy. And while it's a lot of money, it's one of the few government programs that pretty much unequivocally improve the net welfare of the American people. If Bunning wants to hold up something, how about finding some useless. I find Bunning a hypocrit of the first degree. Since he is not up for election, he can do almost anything he wants to. Show up naked for Senate sessions or wander around with a lantern looking for an honest Republican. It he had done this and put his own re-election on the line, he would get a kind of grudging admiration for me. But when he was still a viable Senator instead of a lame duck, we never heard a whisper from him about fixing the deposit. And if Democrats are the party of tax and spend, Republicans have shown themselves to be the party of spend and spend.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)